Author Topic: Mandy Foxxx - Leicester  (Read 15555 times)


105 review(s) for MandyFoxxx (91 positive, 10 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline RedKettle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,170
  • Likes: 77
  •  
  • Reviews: 102
Stunning? Strong statement. She's never been stunning. However, she offered a better service in the past.

It is his review - his opinion is the one that matters on this thread!

Offline Cheltclient

It is his review - his opinion is the one that matters on this thread!

To be fair, I think this notion is open to debate. I’ve seen some other reviews of different girls where someone suggests a girl is stunning and I can’t quite see it. All about opinion I guess :)

Offline Whore Master

It is his review - his opinion is the one that matters on this thread!

Put your toys back in your pram....  :lol: :lol: :lol:
Banned reason: Posting inappropriate links / threats.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Charlie Chalk

To be fair, I think this notion is open to debate. I’ve seen some other reviews of different girls where someone suggests a girl is stunning and I can’t quite see it. All about opinion I guess :)
At least in this case we can easily find out what Mandy looks like and make up our own minds! The problem is when there are no facial pics available and it becomes apparent (usually too late) that one man’s “stunning” is another man’s “munter”, as the “prettiest girls on AW” thread proves.

Having met Mandy a couple of times I think she’s very pretty indeed, although not IMHO “stunning” but it’s obviously down to individual preference.

Offline Cheltclient

At least in this case we can easily find out what Mandy looks like and make up our own minds! The problem is when there are no facial pics available and it becomes apparent (usually too late) that one man’s “stunning” is another man’s “munter”, as the “prettiest girls on AW” thread proves.

Having met Mandy a couple of times I think she’s very pretty indeed, although not IMHO “stunning” but it’s obviously down to individual preference.

Exactly that.

Offline Whore Master

At least in this case we can easily find out what Mandy looks like and make up our own minds! The problem is when there are no facial pics available and it becomes apparent (usually too late) that one man’s “stunning” is another man’s “munter”, as the “prettiest girls on AW” thread proves.

Having met Mandy a couple of times I think she’s very pretty indeed, although not IMHO “stunning” but it’s obviously down to individual preference.

Very much agree with this. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that.

Hopefully RK has gathered his toys together and can endorse CC's very sensible statement!
Banned reason: Posting inappropriate links / threats.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Londontiger

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 165
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 2
Size 14+ and charging 180ph. Not VFM.
Banned reason: Multiple Profiles - James, James021, Londontiger, wearegreat
Banned by: CoolTiger

Offline RedKettle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,170
  • Likes: 77
  •  
  • Reviews: 102
Very much agree with this. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that.

Hopefully RK has gathered his toys together and can endorse CC's very sensible statement!

It was a simple statement of fact, you are the only one getting heated. I do not agree she is stunning, and I have shagged her, but in a review it is his opinion that matters.

Offline Lincs.man1

Size 14+ and charging 180ph. Not VFM.

Unless you like 14+ women and are happy to pay £180.... :unknown: