Author Topic: XyoungthangX - Glasgow Incall Quickie  (Read 2479 times)


5 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5930933) (2 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by agentsmith]

Offline mikemole

External Link/Members Only

Comms: Arranged by text; polite and consistent en route to meet.

Fee: £50 for 15 mins.

Date/Location: Early December 2020/AirBNB flat near Mitchell Library; functional and fairly discreet.

Looks: Facially pretty, very tall and size 12.  Her height possibly makes her look slimmer.  Contrary to one review, she does not have 'big, firm tits'.  Clearly visible from her accurate profile pics that they are smallish and a little saggy.  SP was wearing a large baggy jumper, no knickers.

The Meet: Communal buzzer entry and the SP met me at the door - very friendly and welcomed me with a light kiss.  Shown into the room and began to undress, before approaching the fully naked SP.  Light FK commenced before standing OWO - decent technique but could be better, although no complaints to face-fucking or tea-bagging.  I sat back on the bed and the OWO improved a great deal, she was very enthusiastic.  Heart rate rising, I leaned down for a feel of her moist pussy but to my disappointment my fingers picked up that unpleasant smell we are all too familiar with.  Shag now off the menu for me, I let the BJ continue and she upped the pace.  Asked where I could cum and the response was "wherever you like", so I stood on the bed and gave her a huge facial.

Overall: Did exactly what it said on the tin and I usually have low expectations for a quickie or B&G meet.  The SP provided a very good service and she appears game for a lot of action.  She was very pleasant, but new to the game and by her own admission, packing in a lot of bookings so punters take note.  Would have been a +ve if not for the fanny odour - no excuse in my book.

MM

Online oddson1970

pity about the stinky clinker, she defo looks the part in her pics.Are they accurate?

Offline mikemole

pity about the stinky clinker, she defo looks the part in her pics.Are they accurate?

Yeah very accurate, facially too.  She was really sound and up for all sorts - I wanted a bash at her arse  :(

Might have just been an off day...but it took the shine off a decent quickie.
« Last Edit: January 11, 2021, 01:06:16 am by mikemole »

Offline scotland19something


Contrary to one review, she does not have 'big, firm tits'.  Clearly visible from her accurate profile pics that they are smallish and a little saggy. 

When I met her they were indeed big and firm :crazy: stuff changes during lockdown weight gain/loss bugger knows   :unknown:


nae excuse about a smelly fanny even for a 15 minute booking, that sorta stuff puts me aff other SPs rebooking, as an FYI she was nice smelling down there for me.... probably wasn't expecting a fuck down there for a quickie but it's good hygiene and not off putting.
« Last Edit: January 11, 2021, 03:45:41 pm by scotland19something »
Banned reason: Abuse of a mod and abusive replies to members.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline mikemole

When I met her they were indeed big and firm :crazy: stuff changes during lockdown weight gain/loss bugger knows   :unknown:


nae excuse about a smelly fanny even for a 15 minute booking, that sorta stuff puts me aff other SPs rebooking, as an FYI she was nice smelling down there for me.... probably wasn't expecting a fuck down there for a quickie but it's good hygiene and not off putting.

Apologies mate, that could well be the case.  She just really reminded me of an ex work colleague and her body was almost identical!  Very willing SP, so yes it was disappointing about the whiffy box.