Author Topic: Jenny/Alice@Gorgeous real photos (NOT)-Earlsfield The sub WG was shit aswell  (Read 2374 times)


1 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5635098) (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Likes: 99
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
These are the corresponding links to the profile named Jenny.

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Ok so I saw that this profile was outed before as B&S on a thread sometime ago although I cannot remember which one, but I did not realise the profile was attributed to the ANA/Ibizafue group until I checked after the session I had with the WG that I saw, trying to find her profile. So I had no Idea that the woman I saw was a bait and switch as I did not check beforehand to see who was meant to be available online  :dash:. Sloppy on my part still, should have stayed on point like a ninja as I normally would.

Comms and Location:Called up, usual place near the station.

Price paid and services: £60 for 30 mins. OW and positions.

Looks: Obviously the woman does not look one bit like the pictures as it was a B&S but I did not know till I checked after. The woman I saw was a light skinned dominican woman who was in her 30s. The body was good, bubble butt in the B range, nice C cup tits and the face was slightly above average. However, her skin clarity was very bad. Blotchy skin and the texture was not smooth. Did not manage to analyse this until after I had already paid....again, another sloppy move on my part. I really should not have gone and just had a wank instead :lol:.

Session: So the substitute WG, who went by the name Jenny was relatively friendly, did not speak much english. She started off wanking me off with oil which I was suspicious of as one of those tricks WGs use to prep you up to cum quickly so I was slightly aprehensive on what she was doing. She then went into OW which was perfunctory, no use of hands though which was good but not for a long time. Started off with CG where her riding technique was pretty bad before she tired out and wanted to switch, did have a jolly good squeeze of her tits though as they were really nice. Hit in missionary for a bit where she started to annoy me with the "cum for me baby come on..." act  :dash:. I did get good pentration and body contact but that was overshadowed by her whole cum for me act. I then finished in doggy standing with her at the edge of the bed where her arch was weak and she could not throw the cheeks back either  :mad:

I cleaned myself up and left with the job done of bussing a nut, but not satisfied with the experience. It was a very forgettable fuck to be honest. What I then did after I left...was that I started to think. I was like hang on a minute...she was from the dominican republic; I then started reviewing every dominican republic WG I've fucked in the past years in my head and noticed a trend of majority of them being shit fucks or tried to rush me or pull cum quicker antics. I then came to the conclusion I need to be very wary of chicks from the DR and that I will never go to the DR for solely mongering in the future either. Funnily enough I've read on a well known international forum members slating DR chicks to be one of the worst WGs worldwide for service but it never really clicked in my head.  I've never really had so many dodgy sessions with brazilian or colombian WGs as I had with WGs from the DR. Has anyone else had this experience of crappy DR WGs? The ratio of shit DR WGs compared to other WGs is too much. I've had some good WGs from the DR but a couple more bad ones. Just a random thought.

Please find the picture attached which are not of the WG but adding for record keeping. To be honest I was surprised that the ANA/Ibizafue group is now B&S'ing profiles confidently, they used to be reliable for actually having the chicks present. I should have walked instead of trying to give the WG a chance lol. Meh...



Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: September 18, 2020, 06:39:34 pm by Payyourwaymate »

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
Thanks for the review @payyourwaymate.

Interesting analysis re DR SPs will have to give that some thought.
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline last_days_of_logan

These are the corresponding links to the profile named Jenny.

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Ok so I saw that this profile was outed before as B&S on a thread sometime ago although I cannot remember which one, but I did not realise the profile was attributed to the ANA/Ibizafue group until I checked after the session I had with the WG that I saw, trying to find her profile. So I had no Idea that the woman I saw was a bait and switch as I did not check beforehand to see who was meant to be available online  :dash:. Sloppy on my part still, should have stayed on point like a ninja as I normally would.

Comms and Location:Called up, usual place near the station.

Price paid and services: £60 for 30 mins. OW and positions.

Looks: Obviously the woman does not look one bit like the pictures as it was a B&S but I did not know till I checked after. The woman I saw was a light skinned dominican woman who was in her 30s. The body was good, bubble butt in the B range, nice C cup tits and the face was slightly above average. However, her skin clarity was very bad. Blotchy skin and the texture was not smooth. Did not manage to analyse this until after I had already paid....again, another sloppy move on my part. I really should not have gone and just had a wank instead :lol:.

Session: So the substitute WG, who went by the name Jenny was relatively friendly, did not speak much english. She started off wanking me off with oil which I was suspicious of as one of those tricks WGs use to prep you up to cum quickly so I was slightly aprehensive on what she was doing. She then went into OW which was perfunctory, no use of hands though which was good but not for a long time. Started off with CG where her riding technique was pretty bad before she tired out and wanted to switch, did have a jolly good squeeze of her tits though as they were really nice. Hit in missionary for a bit where she started to annoy me with the "cum for me baby come on..." act  :dash:. I did get good pentration and body contact but that was overshadowed by her whole cum for me act. I then finished in doggy standing with her at the edge of the bed where her arch was weak and she could not throw the cheeks back either  :mad:

I cleaned myself up and left with the job done of bussing a nut, but not satisfied with the experience. It was a very forgettable fuck to be honest. What I then did after I left...was that I started to think. I was like hang on a minute...she was from the dominican republic; I then started reviewing every dominican republic WG I've fucked in the past years in my head and noticed a trend of majority of them being shit fucks or tried to rush me or pull cum quicker antics. I then came to the conclusion I need to be very wary of chicks from the DR and that I will never go to the DR for solely mongering in the future either. Funnily enough I've read on a well known international forum members slating DR chicks to be one of the worst WGs worldwide for service but it never really clicked in my head.  I've never really had so many dodgy sessions with brazilian or colombian WGs as I had with WGs from the DR. Has anyone else had this experience of crappy DR WGs? The ratio of shit DR WGs compared to other WGs is too much. I've had some good WGs from the DR but a couple more bad ones. Just a random thought.

Please find the picture attached which are not of the WG but adding for record keeping. To be honest I was surprised that the ANA/Ibizafue group is now B&S'ing profiles confidently, they used to be reliable for actually having the chicks present. I should have walked instead of trying to give the WG a chance lol. Meh...



Hidden Image/Members Only

Unlucky man...stealth was right.

Massive B&S for this one

Offline y101y

Good review, thanks.

I’ve been with a few DR providers and find them hit or miss. It helps that I’ve been there and travelled quite a bit around the country (no resorts) so I have something to engage with them on, but they can definitely be stand offish.


Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Likes: 99
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
This was the chick I saw. She finally uploaded her pictures, although they are old pictures. The pictures are out of date, they were her in her prime. When I saw her she look mid 30s I reckon, I should have walked lol. Ah yes, the body was the same though.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: November 27, 2020, 07:38:30 pm by Payyourwaymate »

Offline y101y

This was the chick I saw. She finally uploaded her pictures, although they are old pictures. The pictures are out of date, they were her in her prime. When I saw her she look mid 30s I reckon, I should have walked lol. Ah yes, the body was the same though.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Relatively new iPhone so the pics can’t be that old.

Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Likes: 99
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
Relatively new iPhone so the pics can’t be that old.

She does not look like her pictures new phone or not. She has done wizardry with her make up or a photo editing app because she looks older in real life. If you want to go and see her by all means feel free lol.

Offline g284

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 349
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 7
If thats iphone 11 pro then the photos are max just over a year old. Well, you did say the pictures are out of date. Looking at the 2nd photo theres poor photo edit going on around her hand and on the phone itself
Banned reason: Demanding threads be deleted by PM despite warnings.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Likes: 99
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
If thats iphone 11 pro then the photos are max just over a year old. Well, you did say the pictures are out of date. Looking at the 2nd photo theres poor photo edit going on around her hand and on the phone itself

Fair enough, wrong choice of words on my part. What I should have said is that the pictures are not reflective as in real life she looks older than the pictures make out.

Offline last_days_of_logan

Fair enough, wrong choice of words on my part. What I should have said is that the pictures are not reflective as in real life she looks older than the pictures make out.

no need to apologise

we get your point and its appreciated/ respected. I didnt think you would get doubted so i myself didnt chime in but i saw her in a line up of 2 and didnt select her. she looked weathered and worn and old-ish, but that wasnt the reason i didnt pick her...her vibe came across business like and non interested...

...picked the other lady and had an immense time..ended up paying for 1 hour

Offline y101y

She does not look like her pictures new phone or not. She has done wizardry with her make up or a photo editing app because she looks older in real life. If you want to go and see her by all means feel free lol.
Never said I would go see her. No need to get defensive. Just pointing out the phone is new-ish so your assumption that she looks different than her pics is down to something other than her posting very old pics - editing, angles, lighting, etc.

Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Likes: 99
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
Never said I would go see her. No need to get defensive. Just pointing out the phone is new-ish so your assumption that she looks different than her pics is down to something other than her posting very old pics - editing, angles, lighting, etc.

Yh I understand, I put my hands up; my misunderstanding.

Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Likes: 99
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
no need to apologise

we get your point and its appreciated/ respected. I didnt think you would get doubted so i myself didnt chime in but i saw her in a line up of 2 and didnt select her. she looked weathered and worn and old-ish, but that wasnt the reason i didnt pick her...her vibe came across business like and non interested...

...picked the other lady and had an immense time..ended up paying for 1 hour

Thanks.