External Link/Members Only or
External Link/Members Only My 2 cents on this one:
You get a cute, inexperienced, restrictive, girlfriend experience. People will have different views on whether that's a good thing or a bad thing.
Comms were good by whatsapp.
Getting into apartment was a bit confusing. The door way is right between two restaurants with tables outside so you are pretty conspicuous and I felt marginally at risk of bumping into someone and being unable to explain why I was entering/exiting said door way.
The girl. Cute as a button. Profile says 30 but must be younger. She whipped of her dress and lay enticingly on the bed. Taut firm skin, pert breasts with long (but not unpleasantly long) nipples, pretty face, decent teeth and smiley.
She was very responsive to touch and seemed to be enjoying herself. I'm not a big one for RO on WGs but the pussy was well shaved and looked good.
While she seemed to enjoy the rubbing of her clit, she consistently resisted fingering. She was also not a kisser but it still feel vaguely GF like as there was good eye contact throughout.
OW was poor. I stopped her after less than a minute and went for CG.
Sex was ok but had to take the lead on manoeuvring her into positions. I found lack of kissing during sex detracted from the experience.
I was doing 45 mins for £100 as I was tight for time. Failed to assess the time correctly and came on the half hour mark. No time for round 2 but there was good cuddling.
She went and got her phone and lay there in bed next to me openly texting arrangements with other punters and saying how busy her job was. Some may find this unprofessional and off putting. In the moment, I found it strangely charming. Like a GF complaining about her life.
Verdict: neutral for me (though I may well return).
The price point is low for such a slim, attractive girl but the service was a bit too restrictive for me to get what I want from a Punt.
Topic: Nana - Islington (Read 1562 times)