Freya Le Roux Gateshead

[Shutty238]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

30 min incall Gateshead £70

Straightforward comms.  Standard address on booking, with number on arrival.  Nice touch to update on local road works & allowance for extra travel time.

Accommodation not much to say, standard discreet rental flat.  Slightly disconcerting that there was another girl working in the same flat though, numerous ring tones and voices heard during the 30 mins.  Didn't put me off hugely, but not my preference.

Freya is great looking in my opinion.  Just my type, slim, attractive, gym body and nice tan.  Sexily dressed without being ott and within the age range advertised.  Pictures are a good representation, especially those on UKE. 

Services I requested from the preference list delivered with enthusiasm.  French kissing, OWO, RO, rimming both ways, protected sex in a couple of position, finished on body.  Nice and friendly and cheeky smile.  Was eager to please and wasn't rushed to the condom as sometimes happens.

Precautions.  Put frankly; none.  This personally doesn't bother me.  Not to dwell on a covid discussion but my personal view is the only real mitigation is abstenance, anything else in a full service meet is window dressing.  I think the risk was low when we met, I'm young(ish), healthy, and felt the time was right to return with a full understanding of the risks involved.  Others will have their own risk appetite.

Would I return?  I'd love to, but no.  £70 was already pushing my limit, and I see she has now increased to £80 for my preferred time period (30 mins).  This is a shame as she ticks nearly all the boxes for me.  It's hard to see how she can justify the 33% mark up on the regional standard, she's a very good looking girl and clearly smart so I've no doubt she considers this viable, but sadly not from me.  Good luck to her though.

Thanks   

[Global_Punter]

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Mixedracegeordie]

Looks as if the AW link comes back with Stevie from durham Courtesans:

External Link/Members Only

So you could book through them for £70/30mins. Plus she’s 22yrs old if you book through them.....

Never do understand why sgency girls put prices up when they go independent given they keep 100% of monies v getting a cut from an agency (appreciate room costs may vary)

[datwabbit]

Thanks for the review and the heads up on agency being cheaper.

[Shutty238]

Looks as if the AW link comes back with Stevie from durham Courtesans:

External Link/Members Only

So you could book through them for £70/30mins. Plus she’s 22yrs old if you book through them.....

Never do understand why sgency girls put prices up when they go independent given they keep 100% of monies v getting a cut from an agency (appreciate room costs may vary)

Interestingly she's also taller, bigger boobs, & different colour eyes though agency.

As discussed elsewhere that DC website is a car crash so it's hard to tell, but 'Stevie' doesn't seem to appear on their current roster. 

[waynekerr600]

As discussed elsewhere that DC website is a car crash so it's hard to tell, but 'Stevie' doesn't seem to appear on their current roster. 

She did state she's off until 12 August so maybe that's the reason. Also if she's clicking higher rates than she would for agency then it could be money talking.

Thanks for the review OP.

Would you not go back solely because of price or was it the whole package that made you decide that. Her two previous reviews do seem to raise question marks about her.

[Shutty238]

She did state she's off until 12 August so maybe that's the reason. Also if she's clicking higher rates than she would for agency then it could be money talking.

Thanks for the review OP.

Would you not go back solely because of price or was it the whole package that made you decide that. Her two previous reviews do seem to raise question marks about her.

I'd definitely return based on services alone, so yes it's the price hike alone. £20 above my other agency regs is too steep for me, especially given it was evident her overheads are reduced by flat sharing.

[waynekerr600]

I'd definitely return based on services alone, so yes it's the price hike alone. £20 above my other agency regs is too steep for me, especially given it was evident her overheads are reduced by flat sharing.

Cheers

Fair comment. I feel very similar. I still won't go above £60/half.

[Tiger63]

She puts pics up on another forum that attracted my attention as she looks great.
However,her pricing and a couple of other issues means she is a no go for me.
Thanks for the review, very helpful

[johnr1]

Thanks for the review I had looked at her profile a few times as she is right up my street but at £70 / £80 its a no from me

[FLYING BLUE]

Thanks for the review I had looked at her profile a few times as she is right up my street but at £70 / £80 its a no from me

Same goes for me.
Interesting that you not only save cash through the agency but you also save 3 years......apparently 

[Knight Templar]

Thanks for the review , mainly been a rub & tug man lately , however I have had my eye on this girl , once I get the ok for the little blue pills I will be looking to re-start some  selective punts , I think she may be included

[toon972]

Her profile is a bit over the top.

[The Outsider]

Looks as if the AW link comes back with Stevie from durham Courtesans:

External Link/Members Only

So you could book through them for £70/30mins. Plus she’s 22yrs old if you book through them.....

Never do understand why sgency girls put prices up when they go independent given they keep 100% of monies v getting a cut from an agency (appreciate room costs may vary)

Interesting.  She's posted a lot of photos on UKE and I was wondering who she was, as she didn't seem like a new starter.  I've met Stevie and wasn't overly impressed.