MissElla Glasgow

[OGS20]

30 mins £100

Cosy but nice, clean well decorated flat in town. Using her personal flat temporarily I believe.

Comms - Excellent

Location - Easy, plenty free parking after 6pm

Girl - Very friendly, down to earth, good chat. As described in other reviews likes to get to know punter but didn't find her too probing. Maybe revealed a bit more about herself than I would recommend but nothing bad, nice girl. Size bigger than I expected which I was disappointed about but ended up enjoying my time regardless. Good looking girl, profile photo with the tits is misleading, tits aren't as nice as that. She's above average looking.

Meet - After quite a lengthy but enjoyable getting to know each other session, started with fk, not too deep but nice and responsive, whilst fingering and then ro. Was able to get quite a good response from her, got into a rhythm and she eventually came just as I was wondering if she was ever going to. She seemed delighted with my work and with a wild look in her eyes got into some more fk got her into doggy where she felt tight and finished in the bag.

Get the feeling that meeting quality would depend on chemistry, she said as much that, said she doesn't get turned on easily and can't just get straight down to the action.

Would recommend.

[Matrix]

Good to see that you've added to this review! 

Do you have a link?

I'll assume that it's this one.

External Link/Members Only

[daviemac]

Comms - Excellent

Who were you communicating with?? Without that basic information it can't be a review. 

[OGS20]

Good to see that you've added to this review! 

Do you have a link?

I'll assume that it's this one.

External Link/Members Only

That's the one, thanks for adding. Yeah accidentally pressed something on my keyboard and it posted so rushed it as I was worried there was a small window in which to edit.

[OGS20]

Who were you communicating with?? Without that basic information it can't be a review.

With Ella herself, by text only.

[Clattypats]

With Ella herself, by text only.

Really! https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=269994.msg2767629#msg2767629
 

[OGS20]

I knew you would pop up but I won't be addressing that topic. Fellow forum member please feel free to read into the quoted post and clattypats involvement in that thread what you will. I have heard he's quite well acquainted with the subject of that thread. But don't bring that into this thread, noone wants your drama.

[daviemac]

With Ella herself, by text only.

You can't be that stupid surely.    BTW I do not appreciate sarcasm, I have enough to do without looking after jokers like you. Just to remind you of the rules - 

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meet does not need to take place, money does not need change hands, the only criteria is that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc and massage establishments where providers do not have names
Reviews must contain either a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).

You have not done that so I'll move it to discussions where it belongs.

[OGS20]

You can't be that stupid surely.    BTW I do not appreciate sarcasm, I have enough to do without looking after jokers like you. Just to remind you of the rules - 

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meet does not need to take place, money does not need change hands, the only criteria is that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc and massage establishments where providers do not have names
Reviews must contain either a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).

You have not done that so I'll move it to discussions where it belongs.

I know tone can be lost in text I've genuinely misunderstood. Matrix kindly added the link and I was unable to modify my original post to include it. I have confirmed above that the girl linked is the girl with whom the meet took place and this is in fact a review. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

[daviemac]

I know tone can be lost in text I've genuinely misunderstood. Matrix kindly added the link and I was unable to modify my original post to include it. I have confirmed above that the girl linked is the girl with whom the meet took place and this is in fact a review. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

When I posted asking who it was you saw there was no link, that must've been posted while I was typing.  We'll put it down to a misunderstanding on both our parts.   

[Clattypats]

When I posted asking who it was you saw there was no link, that must've been posted while I was typing.  We'll put it down to a misunderstanding on both our parts.   

If no one can see previously maliscious posts on here, which I got told at the time, he won't post again, but just has... What is the point Davie... Enlighten me?... 

[daviemac]

If no one can see previously maliscious posts on here, which I got told at the time, he won't post again, but just has... What is the point Davie... Enlighten me?... 

It would seem that you have some sort of issue with him that no one else can see a reason for. OK so he said he wouldn't post again but then changed his mind, I'm not sure what you want me to do, there's more than me looking at this.   

[Clattypats]

It would seem that you have some sort of issue with him that no one else can see a reason for. OK so he said he wouldn't post again but then changed his mind, I'm not sure what you want me to do, there's more than me looking at this.   

No problem, You're right Davie, others can judge for themselves  I'll give him the credence he deserves... Zilch!... 

The link I posted above is pretty self explanatory to me,others may vary... To each their own... 

[daviemac]

No problem, You're right Davie, others can judge for themselves  I'll give him the credence he deserves... Zilch!... 

The link I posted above is pretty self explanatory to me,others may vary... To each their own... 

I meant other mods were looking at it, not just me.   

[Courtney]

I will be abandoning this account for obvious reasons, I hope this will be my last post.

....obviously not.

[Clattypats]

I meant other mods were looking at it, not just me.   

Only asked you because you had posted on the thread Davie  That wasn't my point.. My point being, admitting to posting bullshit, and here's the important part  ... No matter what WG, it is maliscious... And I don't appreciate his previous shite either... Parents should not be brought into posts... An old tazman tactic, and it's pathetic... I don't think I am the only poster to notice it either https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=163706.msg1760055#msg1760055

[Boinky]

After that outburst and calamity regarding Sophia (a nutjob on her own by all accounts) I take any review or info OGS20 gives out with a huge stink of shite.

It's not trustworthy and neither is he. He had a grievance and an agenda and used this forum to further both. That's not what this place is for. If you can't trust the information given by members then the forum loses all integrity and value.

I also suspect he's a previously banned member.

[Clattypats]

After that outburst and calamity regarding Sophia (a nutjob on her own by all accounts) I take any review or info OGS20 gives out with a huge stink of shite.

It's not trustworthy and neither is he. He had a grievance and an agenda and used this forum to further both. That's not what this place is for. If you can't trust the information given by members then the forum loses all integrity and value.
 
I also suspect he's a previously banned member.

Well said Boinky, and Thankyou    It doesn't matter the WG in question,  he could do that to anyone... You summed the rest up perfectly so I have nothing to add... 

[OGS20]

After that outburst and calamity regarding Sophia (a nutjob on her own by all accounts) I take any review or info OGS20 gives out with a huge stink of shite.

It's not trustworthy and neither is he. He had a grievance and an agenda and used this forum to further both. That's not what this place is for. If you can't trust the information given by members then the forum loses all integrity and value.

I also suspect he's a previously banned member.

No grievance or agenda, the reason I retracted my comments should be plain to see in the thread you've alluded to. But unfortunately discussing that matter at any length is bound to stir up drama due to the people involved, service provider and VERY fluffy punters included, it's what they live for.

[Clattypats]

No grievance or agenda, the reason I retracted my comments should be plain to see in the thread you've alluded to. But unfortunately discussing that matter at any length is bound to stir up drama due to the people involved, service provider and VERY fluffy punters included, it's what they live for.

nah, we ain't all daft.... Why retract your maliscious comment.?...

. Anyone that knows your history on here and the crossover when 2 sites were linked would know you're a shit stirrer... Then you disappear for cert periods ... You are a rat!... All your posts from start to finish on here, name changes etc prove it....Back up your statement "with the people involved"... Would love to hear it?

[Clattypats]

No grievance or agenda, the reason I retracted my comments should be plain to see inthe thread you've alluded to.

How so... If you were truthful to start with any man with a pair of balls would stand by his convictions...  Strange you didn't... Guilty conscience?...  Yeah, definitely... 

[Dukey]

Well said Boinky, and Thankyou    It doesn't matter the WG in question,  he could do that to anyone... You summed the rest up perfectly so I have nothing to add... 

Couldn't help yourself??

[Clattypats]

Couldn't help yourself??

In context to Boinky's post I couldn't have put it any better, or added to his post... I do have a right of reply to the maliscious troll though, unless you think differently?... 

[Dukey]

In context to Boinky's post I couldn't have put it any better, or added to his post... I do have a right of reply to the maliscious troll though, unless you think differently?... 

Dug wi a bone springs tae mind.

[seeker]

Back on topic .
When you say she was bigger than you expected 
What size would you say she is?
Can't really tell from her profile pic  , could we a whale

[OGS20]

I'm not sure about sizes but she seemed bigger than a 10, maybe a 12? Not for you if you prefer anything approaching toned as she had quite big thighs and bum but no shape to them. Not as big as a 14 and nowhere near a whale. For your context, I do prefer them slim, size 10 max and prefer size 8s and 6s. Maybe it's just covid weight

[Jeffman]

How tall would you say she is?

[seeker]

I'm not sure about sizes but she seemed bigger than a 10, maybe a 12? Not for you if you prefer anything approaching toned as she had quite big thighs and bum but no shape to them. Not as big as a 14 and nowhere near a whale. For your context, I do prefer them slim, size 10 max and prefer size 8s and 6s. Maybe it's just covid weight

I too prefer my choices to be 6,8 or max size 10 ,toned.
They get repeat business ,if service is good .
Although I have had a few toned size 12s  over 5'7"
Tall and enjoyed the encounter .
I'll not put her on my HL.

[Jeffman]

Who have you seen that's size 6? The smallest I've seen so far is 8.

[JJ72]

Petite Kate was a 6 for sure when she was about.