Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Swingers & Sinners - Sutton  (Read 5182 times)

Offline incognito121

I decided after a long spate of ill health to get back in the saddle, as it were, and back into the punting scene. My funds are somewhat more limited than they were before and I used to enjoy parties in Bow and Dagenham many years ago, so thought I would try this party. I had seen it advertised on twitter over the past month and see it was well reviewed on here so decided to go along to see what it was all about, especially as Melody Pleasure was advertised. Booking was easy and found the address no problem. I arrived around 12 hoping the party would be in full swing and planned on staying until the end on the hope it would empty out a but, giving me chance for more fun when it was quieter. I only ended up staying around an hour though.

The place was heaving when i arrived, was expecting it to be busy but must have been around 50 guys and certainly not the 25+ girls there they claim....i saw around half that amount of females there, if that. Even then not all of them were playing and the ones that were attractive had guys literally queuing about 5 deep to fuck them. My main problem was the quality of females there. I went wanting to especially see Melody Pleasure and Cheyenne Rose only to find out (after i had paid and had to ask later to find out) that neither of them was there! I quite fancied Alana Bliss from seeing her on twitter but would say them pictures of her are at least ten years old, she did seem nice enough tho and very friendly. She was the only one I ended up playing with. Wanted to play with Roxy Lace but after queuing for what seemed forever in a hot sweaty smelly room I gave up. Was also under the impression that Mackenzie Page would be playing throughout too but only joined in a bit from what i saw, and again was mobbed. also not sure if she saw drunk or intoxicated somehow but i got that impression.

After hanging around for a while i cut my loses and left. I understand for £75 you arent going to get any supermodels there but sure some quality control should be in place. Roxy and a couple of the foreign girls were average but the rest were not my cup of tea at all. There was few swingers there too but there were all old and big women. I also just felt it was a bit chaotic with no real organisation and that 60 plus people sharing one bathroom and toilet is just too much. It was evident by the smell in some rooms that not everyone had a chance to freshen up.

Overall a negative experience for me due to lack of number of women advertised being there, not being told of the change of line up, too many people for the facilities etc. Not how I remembered the party scene but as said not been able to attend one for years so perhaps im looking back with rose tinted glasses, or things have changed a lot. I did like the venue and see they hold a smaller party on the first thursday of every month so may try that in the foreseeable future.

I have attatched pictures of the working girls from the party for reference, apart from Alana as I could not find one representitive of how she looks now.





Hidden Image/Members Only






Offline Steve2

As a mate said last week "Swingers and mingers" . I am not surprised that you cut your losses and left OP

Offline pepsicolaboy

Thanks for your review OP.  Sorry you had a shit time.

Those women look a mess and the word 'paying' for anything shouldn't be associated with any one of them

Looks like the now defunct 'Paradise Spa' in Dagenham level of SP.

 :hi:

Offline Royd30

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.....But I really don’t see it here....DEFINITELY A MISS

Offline Steely Dan

Sorry you did not have a great time OP.

So do you know who the girl who just fucked in the lounge was?  I guessed Cheyenne, but it seems I was wrong.
The girl in the 4th picture with the glasses (Mackenzie Page) called herself Danni.  I don't think she was drunk or anything.  She was working the door until 1:00, then she was just having a laugh.

I believe the top 3 pictures were of swingers, not-paid for girls. But just my impression as a visitor.


Offline sparkus

From the FAQ the set-up for valuables doesn't exactly inspire confidence e.g. not sure I'd want to hand over my wallet and phone to a stranger and "hope for the best".

Offline TallnHung

Sorry you had a shit time.  Was tempted to try these but not now :(

Who is the massive tits blonde in the mask?  Anyone know?

Offline Steely Dan

Sorry you had a shit time.  Was tempted to try these but not now :(

Who is the massive tits blonde in the mask?  Anyone know?
The girl in the mask is a swinger called Jayne.  Nice girl. External Link/Members Only
From the FAQ the set-up for valuables doesn't exactly inspire confidence e.g. not sure I'd want to hand over my wallet and phone to a stranger and "hope for the best".
In terms of valuables, it is as good a system as most parties = same or better as LMP/TPC.  They have numbered pockets with a zip.  Your stuff goes in the pocket.  Every 5 folders and they lock in a cabinet.  You get a wrist strap with your number on it.  Many reasons to give this party a miss if not your thing, but valuables is not one of them.  Clearly you don't want to bring more than a phone or 2 and your wallet anyway....
« Last Edit: March 03, 2020, 07:38:55 pm by Steely Dan »

Offline incognito121

I believe the top 3 pictures were of swingers, not-paid for girls. But just my impression as a visitor.
[/quote]


The top three women were all advertised on there twitter as being at the party, along with Macenzie Page. If they are swingers than this is misleading I feel as advertising them in the way they do makes it out that they are working girls. Same with Maczenzie only hostessing for the majority of the party, she is advertised as a party girl, not the hostess.
They said there would be 25+ women and put 9 links on twitter, out of that 3 werent there (2 of them being the reasons I booked). Maczenzie mainly hostessing and drinking rather than playing. That leaves 5, so if 3 of them out of that are actually swingers that only leaves only 2 actual paid party girls? Yet they are letting over 40-50 single males??
I understood the ratios are high at this price point but if the swingers dont want to play with majority of single guys that leaves it at about 20 to 1.

Offline Steely Dan

That leaves 5, so if 3 of them out of that are actually swingers that only leaves only 2 actual paid party girls? Yet they are letting over 40-50 single males??
I understood the ratios are high at this price point but if the swingers dont want to play with majority of single guys that leaves it at about 20 to 1.

It was busy for sure and your rating and the reason for it is understandable.  No disagreement.  But neutrally, some of your maths is wrong. There were at least 4 (maybe 5 or 6) other paid escorts there - they just didn't have twitter links.  The three in the big BR, the black girl across the hall, and whoever was in the lounge - maybe one more too. So 8 or 9 once mckensie/danni joined in.  Plus a fair few swingers.  But I agree with you it is not good if 2 'stars' don't turn up.

It is more of a Swinger party than other London sex parties for sure. The Swingers did play - just they were older/bigger not to everyones taste clearly. Your review really helps others understand what this party is like.  Your neg and my pos do describe the same party - we just had a different experience.  Also, I was in the mood for what this party is like that day. Some days, I might like it less. If guys want a low ratio sex party with hotter girls, they should skip this and stay with TPC.
« Last Edit: March 04, 2020, 11:46:53 am by Steely Dan »

Offline smiths

What this outfit should do as ALL sex parties should do in my view is inform punters attending beforehand on the day when they are aware if a WG or WGs aren't going to turn up. I always ring the pimp and check the line-up on the day and if one or more WGs aren't their I know the pimp is a lying low life.

In my book to not disclose this info before the party is pure deceit, and unless a WG or WGs simply no show completely and don't bother telling the pimp in which case the pimp should have a cut-off time for contact on the day so they can get another or other WGs in to cover, its a right rip-off. :thumbsdown:  :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: Its how the pimp at GP parties now long gone used to operate, he would confirm the line-up on the phone though an hour before the party only for me to find 1 or more WGs he confirmed as definitely their weren't. :rolleyes:

For the money this outfit sounds ok overall, I would expect the ratio of punters to WGs to be high, that's a reason TPC charge what they do, they limit it to a max 2.1 ratio.

Offline Belgarion

Commiserations and thanks for sharing your experience

Offline fudi_maar

I wish there was a way for me to un-see the photos of the 'ladies' at the start of this thread; it's put me right off my lunch.



Offline incognito121

It was like the ugly bug ball........on viagra

Offline Kingy28

I wish there was a way for me to un-see the photos of the 'ladies' at the start of this thread; it's put me right off my lunch.
:D :lol: :cool:

Offline davidgood

Hi Incognito,

Its a shame you did not enjoy this party, but given the concerns you had about the line-up around 9.30 I was very surprised to see that you actually went along. As there were particular girls you wanted to see I was very surprised that you did not check that they were there before you paid.

I was dispapointed to hear that Melody and Cheyenne were not there but knew that there would be plenty others to play with, including some I had not met  before.

For the info of all, I believe the no shows only came to light on the morning of the party and there was not a lot the organiser could do to replace them given these parties start at 11am. However he was telling customers about the no shows as they arrived, but maybe by 12/12.30 he was getting fed up with having to repeat himself.

Regards,

davidgood


Offline Steely Dan

« Last Edit: March 08, 2020, 07:38:06 pm by Steely Dan »

Offline titanph

Thanks dan. Bit much at 180 I reckon

Offline incognito121

Hi Incognito,

Its a shame you did not enjoy this party, but given the concerns you had about the line-up around 9.30 I was very surprised to see that you actually went along. As there were particular girls you wanted to see I was very surprised that you did not check that they were there before you paid.

I was dispapointed to hear that Melody and Cheyenne were not there but knew that there would be plenty others to play with, including some I had not met  before.

For the info of all, I believe the no shows only came to light on the morning of the party and there was not a lot the organiser could do to replace them given these parties start at 11am. However he was telling customers about the no shows as they arrived, but maybe by 12/12.30 he was getting fed up with having to repeat himself.

Regards,

davidgood

I decided to go along as thought what have I got to lose??.....£75 it turned out! No, perhaps i was overly miffed as the two sps I particularly wanted to see were not there, but i do appreciate shit happens and theres a lot of sickness about this time of year. However, they were advertising for girls on twitter to work last minute, so must have known they didnt have enough girls to cater for the amount of guys booked. There was plenty of girls just hosting and a guy on the door, so wouldnt have hurt mackenzie to have actually worked the whole party as she knew they were understaffed, rather than just keep letting the guys pile in. The queues for the half decent girls was just too much for me. If they had some sort of standard of the women there overall then the likes of Roxy wouldnt get quite so mobbed

Offline Belgarion

I decided to go along as thought what have I got to lose??.....£75 it turned out! No, perhaps i was overly miffed as the two sps I particularly wanted to see were not there, but i do appreciate shit happens and theres a lot of sickness about this time of year. However, they were advertising for girls on twitter to work last minute, so must have known they didnt have enough girls to cater for the amount of guys booked. There was plenty of girls just hosting and a guy on the door, so wouldnt have hurt mackenzie to have actually worked the whole party as she knew they were understaffed, rather than just keep letting the guys pile in. The queues for the half decent girls was just too much for me. If they had some sort of standard of the women there overall then the likes of Roxy wouldnt get quite so mobbed

They wanted to take in as much money as possible. That's why

Offline smiths

They wanted to take in as much money as possible. That's why

Indeed, its not complicated, the reason its costs what it does is because the ratio of punters can be so high. If you go you take your chances it will be lower on the day due to no shows, if its not it can be a sausage fest. However, for £75 for this long a party even if you only get a few punts in it might suit the punter value wise.

Also IF this outfit makes good money that may attract more attractive WGs to it, that's why years ago LMP was so good, it attracted a lot of good looking WGs to it in my experiences, who also offered a good service in the main. The lookers wont stay if the money is piss poor each time, some of the ugly ones may stay though.


Offline uncle jessie

Think they have a party tomorrow , 60 + blokes  crammed in trying to get the chance to shag a couple of girls . That should help the spread of coronavirus  :scare: .