Author Topic: Zara Mckenzies Manchester  (Read 2740 times)

Offline IrishAndy

External Link/Members Only


£150 for one hour.
Usual incall apartment in Manchester.

Initial impression was good as Zara is a pretty lady with classic Pakistani looks. Very nice smile.
The service however was very poor. Despite saying she did “everything” she only did oral with, didnt like fingers anywhere near her pussy and didn’t want me to orgasm inside her (covered obviously).
I also felt rushed and was out of the door in half an hour.

One of those meetings where you leave feeling annoyed with yourself and generally crap.
I know this is a short review but it’s hard to write much more. A good meeting stays in the mind, a bad one is best forgotten! Next...


Offline chrishornx

bummer

you were a gent taking on for the team sorry it was such a disaster - off the 'to do list' she goes

Offline IrishAndy

I probably speak for a few people on here when I say - Come back Jasmine!  Best Asian girl I’ve seen and no issues with service there.

External Link/Members Only

Offline James

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 1,862
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
thanks for the review, she was on my list to see this week. i hate girls who pull out straight away, although its more risk for them because if they dont hold it properly theirs a risk of condom coming off, and juice in them.
Banned reason: Unhealthy obsession with SP malicious posts out of spite
Banned by: daviemac

Offline ProtocolDroid

Pity, as the combination of her height, age, dress and boob size had me tempted as well.

Ending a 60 minute booking after half an hour is really inexcusable :thumbsdown: If I were you, I would probably shoot a message to McKenzies to complain. I doubt they will offer any compensation or even an apology, but they should at least hear it when their girls short-change clients to this degree.

Offline delta69

Complain and Write a review on the website under her profile

Offline ProtocolDroid

Complain and Write a review on the website under her profile

I agree: good idea. Let's see if they publish it. (Some agencies do include negative reviews, some censor them; I have no clue what McKenzies' policy is.)

Offline James

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 1,862
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
Banned reason: Unhealthy obsession with SP malicious posts out of spite
Banned by: daviemac

Offline kingM

External Link/Members Only
One of those meetings where you leave feeling annoyed with yourself and generally crap.
I know this is a short review but it’s hard to write much more. A good meeting stays in the mind, a bad one is best forgotten! Next...

That's terrible especially for an agency girl. Hope you made the agency aware.
Mck's has been around for years and is one of the better agencies and are generally quite consistent.

Offline kingM

I agree: good idea. Let's see if they publish it. (Some agencies do include negative reviews, some censor them; I have no clue what McKenzies' policy is.)

They won't publish it, they don't have any negative reviews on their site. Which is the whole point of having a review system...
« Last Edit: December 11, 2019, 06:29:24 pm by kingM »

Offline Re

Happen to me as well, had a bad experience with a girl called Melissa a year ago, sent a bad review to McKenzie same day, it was not posted on their web site but the girl disappeared after few days, probably sacked.


Offline ProtocolDroid

They won't publish it, they don't have any negative reviews on their site. Which is the whole point of having a review system...

Happen to me as well, had a bad experience with a girl called Melissa a year ago, sent a bad review to McKenzie same day, it was not posted on their web site but the girl disappeared after few days, probably sacked.

Admiral in London is an example of an agency that does publish negative reviews, but I'm not sure whether there are ever any consequences for the girls' contracts. External Link/Members Only, for example, has racked up a number of negative reviews, such as External Link/Members Only, yet they still keep her on the books...

If McKenzies's policy is indeed to sack a girl after one or two really poor reviews then on balance I think that's not necessarily worse than not publishing them, as it arguably puts more pressure on the girls to provide a good service, especially since there are far fewer agencies in Manchester (although in London most girls are linked with several agencies, so that artificially inflates the sense of choice) and in a network such as UKP there's quite a strong collective memory of agency girls, so that a switch in agencies doesn't always mean a fresh start in terms of reputation.
« Last Edit: December 12, 2019, 09:21:43 am by ProtocolDroid »