Cheapest regions to punt in the UK

[Brumbrum]

Hi, was having a chat with my friend earlier and he’s working in Cardiff atm, we were looking at some reviews of this website and to our amazement some of the wg’s We’re £50 cheaper then Birmingham with 40 odd good reviews for that level of attractive girl and services. It made me think what locations are generally cheaper? Anyone noticed anything like that before?

[Moby Dick]

Would be useful if you provide links of who you are comparing.
Girls prices vary depending on what punters are prepared to pay, but this also depends on the quality of the WG (although I am not saying that paying more guarantees better quality)

[Brumbrum]

For example someone like this would be £300 minimum for 2 hour outcal in brum, offer for £200 in wales - External Link/Members Only

[daviemac]

For example someone like this would be £300 minimum for 2 hour outcal in brum, offer for £200 in wales - External Link/Members Only

That's £90 / £140 incall.     Spoilt for choice in the North East at £60 / £110, very well reviewed as well.

[Brumbrum]

I need to move then lol

[Moby Dick]

For example someone like this would be £300 minimum for 2 hour outcal in brum, offer for £200 in wales - External Link/Members Only

That cos she’s from wales with her own set up. Very well reviewed in that part of the world (if I don’t say so myself). £200 is a great offer, but she will fit it around her schedule.
Why would she travel to Brum, away from family etc, at extra cost, with risk of no shows and charge the same?
If you wanna she her then go to Wales at your expense. 
Any other examples?

[daviemac]

I need to move then lol

There's 130 on AW within 15 miles of Newcastle centre plus there's 100's more working through agencies, all £110 ph or less. (Outcalls are £130)

[Fuzzyduck]

This info is a little dated but gives you a feel for things.
External Link/Members Only

[king tarzan]

Certainly not London..

Guaranteed seal of approval that !!

[threechilliman]

Certainly not London..

Guaranteed seal of approval that !!

It's not Manc either.

[Home Alone]

Depends which 'aisle of the market' you're shopping in, tcm.

As an old beggar, I sometimes see older SPs than you may usually do. I set the AW age parameters at 33 - 55, so goodness knows how old some of those claiming to be 55 actually are!

In a recent trawl for Greater Manchester, setting those variables threw up - insert your own joke here  - one SP with an hourly rate of £80 and several charging £100 ph.

[pussylover76]

Certainly not London..

Guaranteed seal of approval that !!

Or Ireland/N Ireland - £200 p/h becoming the norm...
A recent touring masseuse put her price up £50 p/h in order to normalise with the other providers!
 

[Bonker]

Newcastle.
Don't need to search for a WG.
Any girl out in a Friday,  yours for a mojito and a bag of chips.

[dron16]

There’s 2 sets of prices: London prices and non-London prices.

[daviemac]

Newcastle.
Don't need to search for a WG.
Any girl out in a Friday,  yours for a mojito and a bag of chips.

Just shows how prices have gone up here as well, used to be just a bag of chips at one time.      

[Steve2]

Spoilt for choice in the North East at £60 / £110, very well reviewed as well.

You need to visit London mate

£50/£90 is good for Harrow and well reviewed

[daviemac]

You need to visit London mate

£50/£90 is good for Harrow and well reviewed

I've seen the general prices in London, care to link some of the ones you mention. 

Edit

Don't bother I've had a look at your reviews and most are no longer active, there is this barebacker you've seen though -  External Link/Members Only

I'm talking about decent escorts in the NE not barebacking scanks.

[sunnyj]

Certainly not London..

Guaranteed seal of approval that !!

I would say it depends on what a Punter wants. There are WGs available in London at all price ranges.
I have spent from £30 a punt to max £300 and I am after basic vanilla service. Recently I met a WG who confirmed 4 pops and a massage in an hour for £70 and another one 3 pops and a massage in an hour for £80. 

[Steve2]

I've seen the general prices in London, care to link some of the ones you mention. 

Edit

Don't bother I've had a look at your reviews and most are no longer active, there is this barebacker you've seen though -  External Link/Members Only

I'm talking about decent escorts in the NE not barebacking scanks.

 Wind your neck in Davieboy. She certainly wasn't offering bareback on her profile when I saw her

[maxxblue]

I would say it depends on what a Punter wants. There are WGs available in London at all price ranges.
I have spent from £30 a punt to max £300 and I am after basic vanilla service. Recently I met a WG who confirmed 4 pops and a massage in an hour for £70 and another one 3 pops and a massage in an hour for £80. 

Do you have reviews/links for these?

[sunnyj]

Do you have reviews/links for these?

Both got mixed reviews and I would suggest you to read them and make your own decision. Also their massage is very basic and they are not qualified masseurs.   
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=258723.0
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=254956.0

Another well reviewed WG that I have seen and currently on holiday
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=22267
Another well reviewed WG at £90/h, I have not seen her but in my HL
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=3598

[daviemac]

Wind your neck in Davieboy. She certainly wasn't offering bareback on her profile when I saw her

Don't tell me to wind my neck in and don't call me Davieboy. My post was a statement of fact and in no way offensive.

Most of the escorts you've reviewed are no longer active and one that is clearly offers bareback and unprotected sex I only have your word you didn't bareback her. Plus how many of the 'no longer active' ones offered bareback as well.

You want to see barebacking scanks that's your choice, don't expect me to condone it.

I notice you post quite a bit on the SA thread, are you aware that members of that thread are expected to make useful contributions to the general forum as well? A thing you currently do not seem to be doing.

[smiths]

Don't tell me to wind my neck in and don't call me Davieboy. My post was a statement of fact and in no way offensive.

Most of the escorts you've reviewed are no longer active and one that is clearly offers bareback and unprotected sex I only have your word you didn't bareback her. Plus how many of the 'no longer active' ones offered bareback as well.

You want to see barebacking scanks that's your choice, don't expect me to condone it.

I notice you post quite a bit on the SA thread, are you aware that members of that thread are expected to make useful contributions to the general forum as well? A thing you currently do not seem to be doing.

Over the years Steve2 has punted and recommended many WGs to me and none offered BB on their profiles or to me when I punted with them, no idea what they may have offered later, that goes for any WG of course.

Also as you know some A/W profiles get switched to another WG, what a profile states after I have punted with a WG has nothing to do with me, and I have no responsibility as I see it what a WG later advertises she offers, or what the WG who now has the profile offers.

[daviemac]

Over the years Steve2 has punted and recommended many WGs to me and none offered BB on their profiles or to me when I punted with them, no idea what they may have offered later, that goes for any WG of course.

Also as you know some A/W profiles get switched to another WG, what a profile states after I have punted with a WG has nothing to do with me, and I have no responsibility as I see it what a WG later advertises she offers, or what the WG who now has the profile offers.

I don't really care how many he's recommended, he has seen and reviewed an escort who openly offers bareback and that is enough to get him blacklisted by any decent escort. Like I said i have no idea how many of the 'no longer active' escorts he's seen also offered bareback.

If he wants to get his point across telling me to 'wind my neck in' and calling me davieboy is the wrong way to go about it.

I pointed out on this thread that the NE is amongst the cheapest in the country, a well known fact. He mentioned cheaper in London, I asked him to link to some then told him not to bother as most of his reviews are no longer active and one is a barebacker. If anyone can see anything offensive or aggressive in saying that then please point it out. If it is not offensive or aggressive then there is no need for me to 'wind my neck in'.

[Steve2]

Don't tell me to wind my neck in and don't call me Davieboy. My post was a statement of fact and in no way offensive.

Most of the escorts you've reviewed are no longer active and one that is clearly offers bareback and unprotected sex I only have your word you didn't bareback her. Plus how many of the 'no longer active' ones offered bareback as well.

I didn't and none of the girls I visited offered it

You want to see barebacking scanks that's your choice, don't expect me to condone it.

I notice you post quite a bit on the SA thread, are you aware that members of that thread are expected to make useful contributions to the general forum as well? A thing you currently do not seem to be doing.

I think I contribute plenty Davieboy

[daviemac]

Not sure what you're trying to say here, can you try again but quote properly this time.   

[LLPunting]

Don't tell me to wind my neck in and don't call me Davieboy. My post was a statement of fact and in no way offensive.

Most of the escorts you've reviewed are no longer active and one that is clearly offers bareback and unprotected sex I only have your word you didn't bareback her. Plus how many of the 'no longer active' ones offered bareback as well.

You want to see barebacking scanks that's your choice, don't expect me to condone it.

I notice you post quite a bit on the SA thread, are you aware that members of that thread are expected to make useful contributions to the general forum as well? A thing you currently do not seem to be doing.

DM have you been at the same water as SB?

You're condemning a guy by inference NOT proof or even his own words.  Lack of (recent) reviews is not proof of lack of punting.  Seeing a girl who offers BB doesn't prove the punter is a BBer.  It may well blackball him from other SPs who are risk averse (and judgemental) but that's totally different to accusing him of being a BBer.

Steve2 has done his time here more than we have, he's not a known BBer re: SPs so perhaps you need to reconsider why you're giving him so much stick and explain to the rest of us your insight.

NW as well as N, NE, East and SE London are the common areas for WGs @ under 100 ph.  Most don't have any/much rep, let alone good, because they're so itinerant but some gems have been found.

[smiths]

DM have you been at the same water as SB?

You're condemning a guy by inference NOT proof or even his own words.  Lack of (recent) reviews is not proof of lack of punting.  Seeing a girl who offers BB doesn't prove the punter is a BBer.  It may well blackball him from other SPs who are risk averse (and judgemental) but that's totally different to accusing him of being a BBer.

Steve2 has done his time here more than we have, he's not a known BBer re: SPs so perhaps you need to reconsider why you're giving him so much stick and explain to the rest of us your insight.

NW as well as N, NE, East and SE London are the common areas for WGs @ under 100 ph.  Most don't have any/much rep, let alone good, because they're so itinerant but some gems have been found.

On the contribution point very few punters have shared more good info than Steve2 since UKP started and he was a very early joiner. I don't for a second believe Steve is a barebacker of WGs by purposely seeking them out as that's not been my own experience of him, who a punter gets linked with means fuck all without knowing the whole story. Which is what I laid out in a post above, once a punter punts with a WG what she then does is fuck all to do with the punter, plus its a well known fact many A/W profiles are swapped. So it may say barebacker now but didn't when the punter did his review.

And correct about WGs who come and then go sometimes quite quickly, for years Steve was among the first to post about punting with such WGs, he shared that info when he could of kept it to himself, he did loads of TOFTT punts over the years. Few punters in UKP history have made a contribution to UKP like he has in my opinion. Also add his abroad board contributions as well.

[daviemac]

DM have you been at the same water as SB?

You're condemning a guy by inference NOT proof or even his own words.  Lack of (recent) reviews is not proof of lack of punting.  Seeing a girl who offers BB doesn't prove the punter is a BBer.  It may well blackball him from other SPs who are risk averse (and judgemental) but that's totally different to accusing him of being a BBer.

Steve2 has done his time here more than we have, he's not a known BBer re: SPs so perhaps you need to reconsider why you're giving him so much stick and explain to the rest of us your insight.

NW as well as N, NE, East and SE London are the common areas for WGs @ under 100 ph.  Most don't have any/much rep, let alone good, because they're so itinerant but some gems have been found.

I am not the antagonist in this, let's just look at it.
 

I've seen the general prices in London, care to link some of the ones you mention.

A simple request to point some cheaper ones out.

Don't bother I've had a look at your reviews and most are no longer active, there is this barebacker you've seen though -  External Link/Members Only

Pointing out as his reviews are quite old there's no point in linking them and the fact there is one who offers bareback.

I'm talking about decent escorts in the NE not barebacking scanks.

Speaks for it's self, I wouldn't include barebackers in any list of reasonably priced escorts.

I asked in a previous post if my reply was in any way offensive or aggressive, in my opinion it wasn't.

Steve2 could've quite easily replied and pointed out that the escort in question wasn't offering bareback when he say her without the 'wind your neck in davieboy' remark and it would've been left at that.

I have no idea if he seeks barebackers or not I can only comment on the fact he has a barebacker in his reviews.

[LLPunting]

I am not the antagonist in this, let's just look at it.
 A simple request to point some cheaper ones out.Pointing out as his reviews are quite old there's no point in linking them and the fact there is one who offers bareback.Speaks for it's self, I wouldn't include barebackers in any list of reasonably priced escorts.

I asked in a previous post if my reply was in any way offensive or aggressive, in my opinion it wasn't.

Steve2 could've quite easily replied and pointed out that the escort in question wasn't offering bareback when he say her without the 'wind your neck in davieboy' remark and it would've been left at that.

I have no idea if he seeks barebackers or not I can only comment on the fact he has a barebacker in his reviews.

Fair do's if you meant no harm and now none is taken.   

Perhaps it would've been better to neutralise your use of the term by acknowledging that you weren't implying any predeliction on his behalf.  You know that chucking in the BB hand grenade gets everyone's backs up (apart from unashamed BBers).  Using it in a phrase that appears dismissive didn't help.

[daviemac]

Fair do's if you meant no harm and now none is taken.   

Perhaps it would've been better to neutralise your use of the term by acknowledging that you weren't implying any predeliction on his behalf.  You know that chucking in the BB hand grenade gets everyone's backs up (apart from unashamed BBers).  Using it in a phrase that appears dismissive didn't help.

These attempts to put all this back on me is getting boring. Read the thread again from the start. I responded to the OP and quoted him directly when he had quoted prices. I quoted the OP when pointing out, to the OP, what the prices are in the NE, I made no claim that there was nowhere else cheaper.

For reasons best known to himself steve2, instead of just replying on the thread in general, quoted me. I didn't start the thread, nor did I address Steve2 in it and I have no interest in what prices are in other areas. However, as there had already been a post stating London wasn't the cheapest I was a bit curious, though I changed my mind when I saw how old his reviews were.

My posting style has never changed, I say it as it is, if people don't like it they are free to ignore it. Steve2 was the one who made the provocative post, not me, I stated fact. His reviews are old and he has one there openly advertising bareback. Don't blame me for that.

I have no interest in what steve2 does or doesn't do, my only response on this thread had been directed solely to the OP, steve2 chose to direct his replies to me and subsequently make feeble attempts to provoke me.

[Jonestown]

Recently I met a WG who confirmed 4 pops and a massage in an hour for £70 and another one 3 pops and a massage in an hour for £80. 

I would say at 3 and 4 pops in an hour they are on pretty safe ground as far as most blokes are concerned. I'd struggle to make two, three and four pops an hour is the territory of eager teenage puppies, unless of course you can take a mate along to share.

[sunnyj]

I would say at 3 and 4 pops in an hour they are on pretty safe ground as far as most blokes are concerned. I'd struggle to make two, three and four pops an hour is the territory of eager teenage puppies, unless of course you can take a mate along to share.

Each to their own. 
I am after very basic covered vanilla service and OWO/CIM/Facials/GFE/PSE are not a must for me. I can easily manage 2 pops in 30 mins and 3 in an hour booking. So more pops is more vfm for me. 

[Listerlad2011]

Kent area is a hit and miss with prices and often have to travel a greater distance for a cheaper punt