What's this woman's escort name/link?

[worthapunter]

She was listed in Newcastle or Gateshead. Anyone seen her? Just my type. About 35 I'd guess. Took these pics from her insta.

[daviemac]

She was listed in Newcastle or Gateshead. Anyone seen her? Just my type. About 35 I'd guess. Took these pics from her insta.

Well don't post them on here. Read the rules and take particular note of #22. 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=252680.0

[worthapunter]

pic

[daviemac]

pic

What don't you understand about don't post them on here.

[roboeggman]

What don't you understand about don't post them on here.

To be fair to him he only posted that 12s after you did, probably never saw your comment.

[daviemac]

To be fair to him he only posted that 12s after you did, probably never saw your comment.

There were pictures in his first post that I removed before I approved it, hence the 'last edit'. The time on his post is the time he wrote it, the time it appeared was the time of my edit. He posted the pics again and again I removed them, then he posted them again and I deleted his post.

How long do you suggest I should let that continue.   

[roboeggman]

I don't suggest you put up with that sort of thing at all, but I would have thought he'd be on pre-mod anyway.

It just looked funny; as if you were immediately done with his shit.

[daviemac]

I don't suggest you put up with that sort of thing at all, but I would have thought he'd be on pre-mod anyway.

It just looked funny; as if you were immediately done with his shit.

 I've already explained more that is required, if you don't understand it report it and see what Head1 thinks. But I would suggest you read my explanation again before you do.

Just curious, how many times after he's been told not to post pics and he still does do you think action should be taken. Just so I don't get it wrong again.   

[roboeggman]

I think there's a misunderstanding.

I'm more surprised that there's any leniency on that at all tbh, as without the pictures that can't be posted the thread is pointless.

I know other forums have the capability of making it that a member needs so many posts before they can post images or links beyond a whitelist of websites. That might be something useful to Head1.

[daviemac]

I think there's a misunderstanding.

I'm more surprised that there's any leniency on that at all tbh, as without the pictures that can't be posted the thread is pointless.

I know other forums have the capability of making it that a member needs so many posts before they can post images or links beyond a whitelist of websites. That might be something useful to Head1.

As he was new I was giving him a chance so allowed his post but without the pics, but posted straight away that it wasn't allowed and told him to read the rules. That would give him the opportunity to rephrase his question and maybe get an answer.

 He took no notice and  was putting pics up as fast as I could remove them. You may think that he didn't see my post but I know what the date stamp was on the deleted one.

[Mansell]

Thanks for the explanation. Another idiot gone, correct decision Daviemac. 

[CELICA GT]

Thanks for the explanation. Another idiot gone, correct decision Daviemac. 

Agree, he was just a Pratt!

[Tiger63]

TBH I dont think there was any explanation needed from DM.
He must never sleep