Author Topic: mary.love69 Whitechapel  (Read 3124 times)


11 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5335478) (5 positive, 2 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by Dark_Gable]

Offline jesse4585

External Link/Members Only

Very enjoyable punt, but with a few negative qualities.

Booking
I was trying to book Gorgeous Alexya.  Phoned the number her AW page, no answer, but then a few seconds later I get a text with the full address - it's a block of flats in the East end, on a side st off commercial rd, about 7 mins walk from Whitechapel tube.  A couple more txts & I have a one hour booking.  I arrived on time & txted to say so, quick as a flash I get the flat number sent back to me.   A stunning blonde lets me in.

The girl
A stunning slim 5'7  Romanian with dyed blond hair & fake tits.  There's lots of good pics on her AW page, but in person I found her much better looking.   I'd not seen the page until after the booking,  was surprised she's 31, from most angles she could pass for 25.  Being hyper critical, her tit job isn't the best, she has small & unresponsive nipples. (Her tits are overly hard, possibly this is as the job was done very recently & hasn't healed yet.) She has several tattoos,  all quite small & tasteful. She has slightly olive skin, I'd guess she is about half Roma gypsy.  She's more of an exotic beauty rather than  classically beautiful, i.e. the type where YMMV comes into play more than normal, so you might not find her as stunning as I did.  Her English is good, and she's quite charming with a gentle manner, though I'd not think it would be easy to have a deep conversation with her.

The Session
It soon turns out the Alexya isn't available, she is off doing an out call.  Always knew I was taking a punt trying to book her, not the most reliable as her reviews show.  But Mary was so stunning, also friendly and charming, that I was happy to have her instead.  Handed over £120 for the hour.   As I came out of the shower, she was waiting for me on the bed looking inviting in just her underwear. Soon had her undressed, we chatted a bit, then I gave her a massage.

After 10 mins of that I had her off the bed and down on her knees.  She played with my dick & rubbed it between her tits, but seemed a little reluctant to give me OWO. She said she'd get a wet wipe, even though I'd just had a shower.  I then decided not to have OWO   (I've had a FWB thing going on recently, its probably came to a close, but maybe not so I thought why risk it.)

So I got her back in the bed & started some heavy petting to get her ready for sex. She got quite wet, though still put on plenty of lube when I asked for a condom.   Here's the last negative,  a few times I went to kiss her, I don't typically do that with a WG but she's so stunning.  She avoided FK each time.  I had the feeling I could have got her to kiss me if I'd been assertive, but I'm not the type to dominate a lass into doing something I sense she doesn't want.

The sex itself was great. Even with all the lube she was nice & tight.  She's quite submissive, happy to be directed through various positions, mostly doggy & prone bone variations.   In went into mish but with myself upright and her flat on her back. In this position she was gazing into my eyes in the most appealing way, her eyes have a beautiful depth & sparkle to them.  I was fucking her mostly quite hard for about 15 mins. She didn't do anything to try to hurry me. All the while she was moaning sweetly, but in a low key way, which felt natural.   I finished in doggy with a massive orgasm.

Afterwards she offered to give me a massage, it was easily professional quality.

There were a few pauses in the punt where I checked my own phone or had a drink. When this happened she was answering txts on two phones, which were very busy. I guess mostly for Alexya.

Mary's AW has only been up for a week, and from the way she acted,  it's possible she's quite new to this. No sign of her being hardened. She has a charming, fun yet gentle attitude. Despite the reluctance for OWO & kissing, & the fact I didn't get to see the girl I thought I'd booked,  I had a great time.

Offline Heph

A very well written and engaging review - thank you.

Qualifications:
You were bait-and-switched. Whilst your experience was enjoyable in parts, it doesn't apply to the advertised SP. B&S is overwhelmingly the bane of punters - false advertising, misleading - whatever you want to call it, it's unacceptable and needs to be actively (and I would argue... aggressively) discouraged. A positive rating is therefore not apt.

Pics: connected to the above - this report features images of the woman advertised, but not the one that you saw. Your text says that your hostess looked 25. The woman in the pics is mid-to-late 30's, and whilst not for certain, the chances are that her stand-in is of a similar age.

Services: similarly - it's all up for grabs because services differ between individuals. Your review describes what looks like a restricted menu and/or withheld services from those you expected and travelled to see.

On the day, you may have been looking for intimacy, affection and friendliness from another human, and not truly cared about who actually delivered them - and that's just fine. But the primary purpose and benefit of this site, as I understand it, is not to review whether you got those particular things (howsoever they might have been delivered) but rather, whether the advertised ingredients, dish and experience were delivered. In this instance, you can only faithfully affirm 1 out of those 3. When I look at a review of sexbot1138 - I want or need to see a review which pertains to her - or which emphatically warns me that there's a good chance that I'm not going to receive what the advertisement is selling.

I can't recall whether there's a particular or mandatory protocol for dealing with B&S reviews, and you don't need to pay heed to me; however, general custom seems to be that we call it out - as a negative... then, if there's anything else we might wish to add about the experience, to qualify it.


« Last Edit: August 07, 2019, 01:45:23 am by Heph »

Offline jesse4585

Thanks for the comment Heph, much appreciated.

Just to clarify, the link I provided - External Link/Members Only - is definitely the woman I saw (Mary).

On the age thing, I don't disagree if you say she looks mid to late 30s from the pics.   But in real life I'm if anything above average at guessing ages, and there is no way Mary looked that old when you meet her in the flesh.  As said she looks much better than the pics, at least she did to me.

On the bait & switch thing,  I'll happily do a negative review for the woman I tried to book  (Gorgeous Alexya)  if you think I should?   (I only hesitated as Alexya already seems to have 6 neg reviews v 3 positives, and my punting intuition is that the positive reviews by Rekbang, Muff licker &  Lorachoop are well deserved. Even one of the negative reviews says Alexya is also stunning.)

I stand by the +ve review for Mary. I hear what you're saying about the negatives.  But if a punters not put off by the reluctance to kiss & give OWO, along with the overly hard fake tit job - then I think they might get a great session with Mary.  She has an unusually sweet manner, & is rather stunning, especially for £120 / hour. 

Offline Fully Sated

Thank you for you review. I have been interested in seeing Alexya too, I think that you should post a negative for the Alexya's bait and switch in my opinion (and include Mary's AW link in the review) It will be a good warning for any potential punters, at least they will know who they may end up seeing.


On the bait & switch thing,  I'll happily do a negative review for the woman I tried to book  (Gorgeous Alexya)  if you think I should?   (I only hesitated as Alexya already seems to have 6 neg reviews v 3 positives, and my punting intuition is that the positive reviews by Rekbang, Muff licker &  Lorachoop are well deserved. Even one of the negative reviews says Alexya is also stunning.)


Offline Heph

Thanks for the comment Heph, much appreciated.

Just to clarify, the link I provided - External Link/Members Only - is definitely the woman I saw (Mary).

On the age thing, I don't disagree if you say she looks mid to late 30s from the pics.   But in real life I'm if anything above average at guessing ages, and there is no way Mary looked that old when you meet her in the flesh.  As said she looks much better than the pics, at least she did to me.

On the bait & switch thing,  I'll happily do a negative review for the woman I tried to book  (Gorgeous Alexya)  if you think I should?   (I only hesitated as Alexya already seems to have 6 neg reviews v 3 positives, and my punting intuition is that the positive reviews by Rekbang, Muff licker &  Lorachoop are well deserved. Even one of the negative reviews says Alexya is also stunning.)

I stand by the +ve review for Mary. I hear what you're saying about the negatives.  But if a punters not put off by the reluctance to kiss & give OWO, along with the overly hard fake tit job - then I think they might get a great session with Mary.  She has an unusually sweet manner, & is rather stunning, especially for £120 / hour.

No - actually, it looks like I owe you an apology. The late hour, a surfeit of wine and some impaired judgment being some contributors, though I can't ignore my own latent stupidity.

For some reason, apparently mistaken, I'd understood that you had reviewed the one you saw under the aegis of the other - and posted the bait's photos. Silly me. I'm sorry, and I thank you for your reasoned and polite response.

best, Heph

« Last Edit: August 07, 2019, 03:12:15 pm by Heph »

Offline Honestpunter

Good review, planning to see her, couple of questions,
- Does she have a good ass?
- Did she mention anything about extras?
Thanks

Offline jesse4585

Cheers Honestpunter,

Yes a good shapely ass, though definitely not a bubble bub.

Extra's were not mentioned.  She would have given me OWO with no extra charge, but as per my review there was some reluctance, and as I was already in two minds about the service, I decided not to have it.    Hope it's a good punt for you!

Offline jesse4585

Just to add,  she has several ass pics on her AW profile, and these are very accurate.   It was just her face that I found even better looking when seeing her for real.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline tantraman

Thanks for the TOFFT, OP :hi:

... There's lots of good pics on her AW page, but in person I found her much better looking ...

This is good enough for me :wacko: ...

Hidden Image/Members Only

HL'd :thumbsup:

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Thanks for the TOFFT, OP :hi:

This is good enough for me :wacko: ...

Hidden Image/Members Only

HL'd :thumbsup:

What a figure to lick lemon shower gel off whilst in the shower 👅👅😋😋
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline jesse4585

You're welcome Tantraman. :drinks:


What a figure to lick lemon shower gel off whilst in the shower
Glad you like KT.  PS, I hope the lack of kissing in my session doesn't put you off.  If you read Lorachoop's review he was more assertive and got some excellent OWO and a free King Tarazan style kiss test.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
You're welcome Tantraman. :drinks:

Glad you like KT.  PS, I hope the lack of kissing in my session doesn't put you off.  If you read Lorachoop's review he was more assertive and got some excellent OWO and a free King Tarazan style kiss test.

I've been used to a few horror shows... :scare: :scare:
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Ilfordboy88

She looks amazing...
I think I'm convinced... gonna see her tomorrow and write a review

Offline NightKid

What a figure to lick lemon shower gel off whilst in the shower 👅👅😋😋

Why the hell would you want to lick lemon flavoured chemicals that's likely to make you gag? Your levels of weird continue to astound monkey man ...  :lol:

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Why the hell would you want to lick lemon flavoured chemicals that's likely to make you gag? Your levels of weird continue to astound monkey man ...  :lol:

When they are showering with water dripping off :hi:
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Ilfordboy88

This girl is amazing....
120 for an hour was well spent..

Not sure y the other guy said she was reluctant to gove owo ... he owo was amazing and she even licked my balls..

Jus came out now... I'm in heaven

Review will follow soon

Offline jesse4585

I said she "seemed a little reluctant"  to give me OWO as she seemed a little reluctant.  Lorachoop also got outstandingly good OWO from her, perhaps it's just me, I'm probably not as young & or fit as you two are.  Anyway even I'll admit she's stunning,  a lot better looking than her pics. Also charming with it and overall she gave me excellent service.

Glad you had a great time with her Ilfordboy88, look forward to your review.  :drinks:

Offline Ilfordboy88

It was the good reviews here that got me to see her..
She looks better than the pics... absolute stunner and very willing to please..