Author Topic: Mandy Foxxx - Seriously underwhelming don't believe the hype  (Read 7623 times)


105 review(s) for MandyFoxxx (91 positive, 10 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by Davey Dykes]

Offline BlueRock

External Link/Members Only
Seen at the start of the year.

So Mandy is highly acclaimed by most on here so perhaps I caught her on a bad day or its just hype up to your opinion.

To briefly summarise for the price a poor punt on par with Romanians.

Comms: all pretty good

Mandy herself: is the girl in the pics. Looks wise it's a subjective matter, she's an attractive and curvy girl but personally the stunning status assigned by other reviewers is a bridge to far. Girl next door or at work you want to fuck is more apt. Her boobs are clearly fake despite her profile claiming otherwise on AW profile. Upside down t shape scar tissue is apparent from the nipple to the base of each breast. Why lie in this day and age where implants are relatively common.

Service: generally not great considering the price. Felt extremely rushed, no dfk a real deal breaker for myself. Oral technique was seriously poor. Very loose with no negative pressure applied. Ham acting was apparent during intercourse to no doubt speed things up.
Expected a far better service from all the reviews. Truly underwhelmed and undeserving of anymore of my time discussing the matter.

Offline Cryton123

I attended one of her parties about two years ago and wasn’t that impressed with her tbh.

She definitely has false boobs and she was bigger than I expected. And the other girl at the party was slimmer, prettier and obviously more popular with the guys and this didn’t go down well with Mandy (in my opinion). She started showing off and acting all weird as though she was either craving more attention or had taken something. Either way her behaviour was strange and made me think she wasn’t quite right in the head.

It put me off ever wanting a one to one with her.

Offline Belgarion

External Link/Members Only
Seen at the start of the year.

So Mandy is highly acclaimed by most on here so perhaps I caught her on a bad day or its just hype up to your opinion.

To briefly summarise for the price a poor punt on par with Romanians.

Comms: all pretty good

Mandy herself: is the girl in the pics. Looks wise it's a subjective matter, she's an attractive and curvy girl but personally the stunning status assigned by other reviewers is a bridge to far. Girl next door or at work you want to fuck is more apt. Her boobs are clearly fake despite her profile claiming otherwise on AW profile. Upside down t shape scar tissue is apparent from the nipple to the base of each breast. Why lie in this day and age where implants are relatively common.

Service: generally not great considering the price. Felt extremely rushed, no dfk a real deal breaker for myself. Oral technique was seriously poor. Very loose with no negative pressure applied. Ham acting was apparent during intercourse to no doubt speed things up.
Expected a far better service from all the reviews. Truly underwhelmed and undeserving of anymore of my time discussing the matter.

Thanks for the review. A lot of the time, the hype from some in Sherwood needs to be taken with a pinch of salt.

The fake breasts bit is hilarious as it is obvious from her photos.

TCM if memory serves had an underwhelming time with her too. That's why I'm wary of the reviews some punters write.

Offline Belgarion

I attended one of her parties about two years ago and wasn’t that impressed with her tbh.

She definitely has false boobs and she was bigger than I expected. And the other girl at the party was slimmer, prettier and obviously more popular with the guys and this didn’t go down well with Mandy (in my opinion). She started showing off and acting all weird as though she was either craving more attention or had taken something. Either way her behaviour was strange and made me think she wasn’t quite right in the head.

It put me off ever wanting a one to one with her.

She was accused on UKE by other escorts of outing them with a note which was pasted in a doorway or something.

She is also quite creative with her stories. Definitely one to avoid

Offline Cryton123

She was accused on UKE by other escorts of outing them with a note which was pasted in a doorway or something.

She is also quite creative with her stories. Definitely one to avoid

That wouldn’t surprise me to be honest. She definitely has narcissistic traits.

Offline Beerswillin99

C-C-C-Combo breaaakkeerr with the first negative  :lol: Shame you had a bad time, thanks for the review  :thumbsup:

Offline HailWood

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,962
  • Likes: 2
  •  
  • Reviews: 53
Sorry to hear you had an underwhelming experience OP. Where did the punt take place and how long/price please?

Offline threechilliman

Thanks for the review. A lot of the time, the hype from some in Sherwood needs to be taken with a pinch of salt.

The fake breasts bit is hilarious as it is obvious from her photos.

TCM if memory serves had an underwhelming time with her too. That's why I'm wary of the reviews some punters write.

Indeed I did.

Offline iq129

First negative after 78 positives. Posting a negative in such a situation requires guts. Well done! I feel sorry for the OP’s bad experience and I applaud him for what I believe is a very genuine report. This goes to show how highly rated and positively reviewed girls can also provide a poor service from time to time.

Offline Cryton123

First negative after 78 positives. Posting a negative in such a situation requires guts. Well done! I feel sorry for the OP’s bad experience and I applaud him for what I believe is a very genuine report. This goes to show how highly rated and positively reviewed girls can also provide a poor service from time to time.

Posting a negative shouldn’t take guts though, regardless of how many positives a girl has. If guys are scared to be the first to post a negative for a popular girl, other members could be missing out on up to date, honest info  :hi:

Offline Belgarion

Posting a negative shouldn’t take guts though, regardless of how many positives a girl has. If guys are scared to be the first to post a negative for a popular girl, other members could be missing out on up to date, honest info  :hi:

The problem is the fluffies and white knights
 

Offline jayjuk

Doesn't she also have a caesarian scar? I saw her a while back, and thought she had a pretty face, but her body was definitely under whelming, so never returned.

Offline threechilliman


Offline Belgarion


Offline BlueRock

Cryton and TCM are right. We should post as we find. Other punters can judge as they see fit. I doubt one negative will sway anyone, could be down to multiple reasons who knows. If members are scared to leave a bad review the fluffies and WKs have taken charge of this forum. As for C section scars yes but not an issue personally.

Offline PepeMAGA

Indeed. I suspect some are keeping her updated
I'm surprised there hasn't been any rebuttal yet.

Offline Zeusthedoc

I'm surprised there hasn't been any rebuttal yet.

ordinarily i'd disagree given that the time frame.
however, 78 positives - this will get back to her soon!

maybe she's playing it sensible hoping that 78 positives outweigh 1 negative.

that said - i'm in two minds about her. have been ever since she came back from only seeing 'regulars'.

Offline azrael

Thanks for the review b.r, kudos to you for posting this negative. Expect some backlash from either her or her white knights that will definately come charging in at some point considering she's an east mids darling. Quick question was this on her recent tour to brum? She's been know to have a revolving door policy when she travels, some times even double books clients. Best of luck in your next punt :drinks:

Offline PepeMAGA

ordinarily i'd disagree given that the time frame.
however, 78 positives - this will get back to her soon!

maybe she's playing it sensible hoping that 78 positives outweigh 1 negative.

that said - i'm in two minds about her. have been ever since she came back from only seeing 'regulars'.

there have been many plastic swords drawn in her defence in the past I think. as its posted in the west midlands might not have been picked up yet.

Offline Grenadier36

Sounds like you had a shit time OP, hope your next one is much better  :thumbsup:

Offline HailWood

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,962
  • Likes: 2
  •  
  • Reviews: 53
there have been many plastic swords drawn in her defence in the past I think. as its posted in the west midlands might not have been picked up yet.
It will have been picked up. There was a thread started before this review was posted in EM section and that thread subsequently references this.

What I hope is maybe, just maybe, the knightly tendencies in Sherwood have been measured, weighed and found wanting.

I appreciate this may sadden some.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,535
  • Likes: 191
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Shame about the shit punt.

FYI an inverted T from the nipple is usually the sign of breast REDUCTION surgery (or possibly other medical treatment).  The selling point of cosmetic surgery is the lask of scarring involved!

Offline BobAJobMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 47
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Shame about the shit punt.

FYI an inverted T from the nipple is usually the sign of breast REDUCTION surgery (or possibly other medical treatment).  The selling point of cosmetic surgery is the lask of scarring involved!

Yep, I think shes admitted to having a breast reduction/uplift and a tummy tuck.
Banned reason: Claiming this site condones paedophilia, it doesn't
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Belgarion

Yep, I think shes admitted to having a breast reduction/uplift and a tummy tuck.

Hello Mandy's Knight

Offline BobAJobMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 47
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Hello Mandy's Knight

Haha - no just saying shes had a reduction not implants.
Banned reason: Claiming this site condones paedophilia, it doesn't
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Belgarion

Haha - no just saying shes had a reduction not implants.

Of course  :rolleyes:

Offline Punterperson1971

Yep, I think shes admitted to having a breast reduction/uplift and a tummy tuck.
And have you seen her,if so why don’t you review her as well you’ve only been a member since 8th August  and the way your coming across at the minute people will give you a hard time.

Offline winkywanky

Yep, I think shes admitted to having a breast reduction/uplift and a tummy tuck.

Of course  :rolleyes:


I've never seen this girl and I never shall (and I have no vested interest), but for the record Bob's actually right, the breast scars she has are of a reduction, NOT an enlargement.

I've previously fallen foul of this myself, and been put right on it  :hi:.

Offline Belgarion


I've never seen this girl and I never shall (and I have no vested interest), but for the record Bob's actually right, the breast scars she has are of a reduction, NOT an enlargement.

I've previously fallen foul of this myself, and been put right on it  :hi:.

Not particularly concerned about the reduction/enhancement but the timing of his comments

Offline winkywanky

Not particularly concerned about the reduction/enhancement but the timing of his comments


I would say never let a healthy level of scepticism get in the way of knowing the facts.

Infact it was LLPunting who first mentioned the reduction thing (then picked up by BobAJob). And it was in direct response to the OP's assertion that she'd had enlargement surgery, so perfectly reasonable in my book.

Just because a WG doesn't provide a good service and deservedly gets a Negative, doesn't mean she shouldn't get correct and reasoned posts about it.

Offline Belgarion


I would say never let a healthy level of scepticism get in the way of knowing the facts.

Infact it was LLPunting who first mentioned the reduction thing (then picked up by BobAJob). And it was in direct response to the OP's assertion that she'd had enlargement surgery, so perfectly reasonable in my book.

Just because a WG doesn't provide a good service and deservedly gets a Negative, doesn't mean she shouldn't get correct and reasoned posts about it.

You are missing the point. I'm not fussed about the content of his comments, it is the timing of them.

Whether she's had a reduction or enhancement is neither here nor there.


Offline winkywanky

You are missing the point. I'm not fussed about the content of his comments, it is the timing of them.

Whether she's had a reduction or enhancement is neither here nor there.


I would disagree.

When a girl gives a bad service she is rightfully castigated for it and given a Negative review. But that's no justification for throwing the kitchen sink at her with stuff that's clearly wrong. Keep it real.

LLPunting said:

Shame about the shit punt.

FYI an inverted T from the nipple is usually the sign of breast REDUCTION surgery (or possibly other medical treatment).  The selling point of cosmetic surgery is the lask of scarring involved!

Quite rightfully he commiserates with the OP's bad experience, and he doesn't question that in any way, he merely points out a small factual discrepancy - which you also jumped on by the way, when you said: The fake breasts bit is hilarious as it is obvious from her photos .

When you 'question the timing of his comments', would you also question his 6500 posts and 118 reviews over nearly three years? And he hasn't even seen the girl, so why should he be perceived as Whiteknighting her?

Offline Happyjose


I would disagree.

When a girl gives a bad service she is rightfully castigated for it and given a Negative review. But that's no justification for throwing the kitchen sink at her with stuff that's clearly wrong. Keep it real.

LLPunting said:

Quite rightfully he commiserates with the OP's bad experience, and he doesn't question that in any way, he merely points out a small factual discrepancy - which you also jumped on by the way, when you said: The fake breasts bit is hilarious as it is obvious from her photos .

When you 'question the timing of his comments', would you also question his 6500 posts and 118 reviews over nearly three years? And he hasn't even seen the girl, so why should he be perceived as Whiteknighting her?

I have no desire to go around the walls with you again, but you have got the wrong end of the stick here

Belgarion is referring to reply 22. The knight comment was clearly directed at that poster

He has passed no comment on LLPunting or his posts

A 1st post in defence of a WG is always going to be met with scepticism on here, and as a long term member you will be well aware of the reasons for this

By the way, if you feel compelled to respond, let's keep it civilised

Offline BobAJobMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 47
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Don't argue on my behalf - have no desire to see Mandy. I mentioned her work specifically as I dont like fakes and scars. Just wanted to back up LLPunting! Implant scars are under the boobs or in the armpits.
Banned reason: Claiming this site condones paedophilia, it doesn't
Banned by: daviemac

Offline winkywanky

I have no desire to go around the walls with you again, but you have got the wrong end of the stick here


Simple then, fucking don't  :hi:.

Offline Belgarion

Don't argue on my behalf - have no desire to see Mandy. I mentioned her work specifically as I dont like fakes and scars. Just wanted to back up LLPunting! Implant scars are under the boobs or in the armpits.

No one questioned LLs comments as he's a regular contributor to the site.

Your contribution is what I questioned

Offline Belgarion


I would disagree.

When a girl gives a bad service she is rightfully castigated for it and given a Negative review. But that's no justification for throwing the kitchen sink at her with stuff that's clearly wrong. Keep it real.

LLPunting said:

Quite rightfully he commiserates with the OP's bad experience, and he doesn't question that in any way, he merely points out a small factual discrepancy - which you also jumped on by the way, when you said: The fake breasts bit is hilarious as it is obvious from her photos .

When you 'question the timing of his comments', would you also question his 6500 posts and 118 reviews over nearly three years? And he hasn't even seen the girl, so why should he be perceived as Whiteknighting her?

You've got the wrong end of the stick again. My comments are not directed to LL.

 :hi:

Mallow841

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Yep, I think shes admitted to having a breast reduction/uplift and a tummy tuck.

She has.
It used to be on her profile I don’t know if it still is, and I haven’t looked.

But the T scar is certainly used for breast reduction and uplift, not enhancement.

She used to appeal to me & I had her on my hotlist at one point, but no longer. I get a “tacky” “chavvy” vibe from some of her photos which is a put off for me.
« Last Edit: August 26, 2019, 12:28:35 am by Mallow841 »