Author Topic: Jelly - Diva - GFE Par Excellance  (Read 1671 times)

Offline distancetravel20

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 145
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 9
External Link/Members Only

Location - Earls Court

Accommodation - Not that upmarket but fit for purpose

Booking Process - Very efficient by Diva over SMS

Cost - £200/hr

Girl - Stunning blonde in mid 20s I would guess, very much like the piccies.  Sexy as hell and perfect body with natural C cups and nice arse.  Dressed to perfection in nice dress, heels and lingerie

Service - This is what I’m talking about.  Perfect GFE with none stop DFK, very nice personality, nice to talk to, eager to please.  Outstanding OWO.  No clock watching.

Fantastic session, best in ages.  Thanks to the previous reviewer for the recommendation !
« Last Edit: July 01, 2019, 11:19:09 am by distancetravel20 »
Banned reason: Refusing to accept the STI rules.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Her squeezing her jelly babies on the recorded clip is absolutely mouthwatering 😋😋😋😋👅👅👅👅👅
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac


Offline bonapati

A lot of these pictures are photoshopped and are over 5 years old.

Not sure if we are allowed to mention other websites but “wayback machine” reveals a lot - especially how long the photos have been published.

Offline Fully Sated

A lot of these pictures are photoshopped and are over 5 years old.

Not sure if we are allowed to mention other websites but “wayback machine” reveals a lot - especially how long the photos have been published.

Bonapati, Could you post the more accurate photos from that website, I cannot see why that could be a problem?

Offline Fully Sated

Bonapati, Could you post the more accurate photos from that website, I cannot see why that could be a problem?

Or rather not allowed.

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,761
  • Likes: 545
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
A lot of these pictures are photoshopped and are over 5 years old.

Not sure if we are allowed to mention other websites but “wayback machine” reveals a lot - especially how long the photos have been published.

Shouldn't be a problem: the ban is on linking to other punting review websites

Offline bonapati

Bonapati, Could you post the more accurate photos from that website, I cannot see why that could be a problem?

The pictures are same. What wayback machine reveals is how long ago they were published or have been on the site. Sometimes it’s hit and miss as websites are captured overtime. It’s research best done on a desk or laptop rather than phone (but you can still get good info). So bearing in mind you find out the photos have been on the site for 5 years and the SP has 30 reviews, then obviously she has changed names or switched agencies etc. SPs generally do one studio shoot and reuse the photos.

Offline Fully Sated

The pictures are same. What wayback machine reveals is how long ago they were published or have been on the site. Sometimes it’s hit and miss as websites are captured overtime. It’s research best done on a desk or laptop rather than phone (but you can still get good info). So bearing in mind you find out the photos have been on the site for 5 years and the SP has 30 reviews, then obviously she has changed names or switched agencies etc. SPs generally do one studio shoot and reuse the photos.

Thank you for that information Bonapati.

Offline distancetravel20

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 145
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 9
All I can say is that she doesn’t look much older than the pics in person.  Maybe a year or two if I’m harsh.  The pictures are a very good likeness, especially the top right one above.
Banned reason: Refusing to accept the STI rules.
Banned by: daviemac