Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Are escorts rich?  (Read 5551 times)

Offline Shearer1955

I suspect the number of prossies who have become wealthy are in a small minority  ... many will have had quite considerable amounts passing through their hands but for reasons already outlined the cash disappears as quickly as it is "earned"
Perhaps we should applaud those who have the common sense to invest their "profits" for the future and have a residual income for later life  :hi:

Offline lewisjones23

How do we get him removed - he's wasting my time, and I'm sure the time of many others?

what a crying mong you are

Offline dick78

I've been seeing a girl regularly for about three months now and we have become quite chatty in that time.   She charges £200 ph, dropping to around £150 ph on reverse bookings and for old clients.  She hadn't seen a client for over a week and was fending off the usual tight bastards who want the world for £100 all in, but getting no sensible calls.

Apparently, London is quiet in the summer and there is so much competition that her work has dropped off considerably, even since I first saw her.  Her rent is £600 per week and the rest of it adds up to around another £300 per week, for heat and light, supplies and so on.   It doesn't take long to work out that she needs to do 5 hours per week to break even, and even that wasn't happening.

Now, IMO, she is one of the classiest, most attractive and most adventurous girls around, certainly that I've ever met, and offers a wide variety of more out there services.  When she replied to my RB I thought all my ships had come in.  How this girl can have no work is totally beyond me, other than the punters don't want to pay.  So no, she cerainly isn't rich and she certainly is profligate.  I've seen her dealing with her financial affairs and she is very good indeed in fact but rich, no.

Offline sensualencounter

Maybe drop her hourly rate to £150 and she’ll get at least 6 hours work? Just a thought...

Offline freeze44

Maybe drop her hourly rate to £150 and she’ll get at least 6 hours work? Just a thought...

+1 and also prob giving the punter a sob story...a link be handy...

Offline NotMe

I don't know if there is a standard in terms of how well off escorts are.
I know one or two that started young and worked for agencies where they were seeing 10-20 men per day for 3-5 days per week and made loads for a few years before going independent. These girls have money in the bank and are can retire any time they like.
Then there are some girls that spend it as soon as they make it. They have kids or similar cash black holes and escorting is the easiest way to make enough money, without taking 3-5 years out to get a degree and the work experience required to earn a sufficient wage, to support them.
I would hope though that most girls are good enough with money to have savings considering just two 30-minute bookings (assuming £60 each) per day for 5 days per week works out to be over £30,000 per year.

Offline king tarzan


Yes. I am. He is continually and gratuitously abusive, both to punters and WGs who are trying to engage in discussion (just this thread shows examples of both). He has been the same way for years. Very tiresome.

Personally I find James entertaining and funny..👍👍👍

Obviously others have very different opposite opinions...
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline finn5555

How do we get him removed - he's wasting my time, and I'm sure the time of many others?

Jesus grow a pair pop him on ignore and stop whinging  :wacko:
« Last Edit: May 29, 2019, 06:58:16 pm by finn5555 »

Offline king tarzan

I don't know if there is a standard in terms of how well off escorts are.
I know one or two that started young and worked for agencies where they were seeing 10-20 men per day for 3-5 days per week and made loads for a few years before going independent. These girls have money in the bank and are can retire any time they like.
Then there are some girls that spend it as soon as they make it. They have kids or similar cash black holes and escorting is the easiest way to make enough money, without taking 3-5 years out to get a degree and the work experience required to earn a sufficient wage, to support them.
I would hope though that most girls are good enough with money to have savings considering just two 30-minute bookings (assuming £60 each) per day for 5 days per week works out to be over £30,000 per year.

You will never see a woman escort who has a fully paid up pad in London, a nice car, £100k in the bank ..
Because the above person has no need ever to escort..

All these figures being handed around its like the escorts are filthy rich and continue to suck dick for money...


An escort comes up trump's on the lotto with let's say £100k she's gone with the wind!!
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

SlamBoy

  • Guest
I spoke to a quite well-known WG recently who has been around for years. She told me that it was very very difficult to make money in London these days because:

(1) the rents to stay there per day are high.

(2) there is so much competition.

(3) there are so many cheap Romanians etc. who offer a crap service but do so for very little and snap up most of the punters who are not particularly discerning and just want a cheap P&D.

(4) When a Sergei rents a cheap house in London and stuffs it full of 5 or 6 Romanian WGs who will go all in (plus esstrasss bby) for £100 ph, there is no way independent WGs who need to hire hotel rooms etc. can easily compete with that, so the economics most often don't make sense.

Hence, it is more difficult to become a 'rich' WG in London these days.
« Last Edit: May 29, 2019, 07:22:03 pm by SlamBoy »

Offline finn5555

You will never see a woman escort who has a fully paid up pad in London, a nice car, £100k in the bank ..
Because the above person has no need ever to escort..

All these figures being handed around its like the escorts are filthy rich and continue to suck dick for money...


An escort comes up trump's on the lotto with let's say £100k she's gone with the wind!!

That’s so true they don’t do because they love cock  :hi:

Offline xyfek

I spoke to a quite well-known WG recently who has been around for years. She told me that it was very very difficult to make money in London these days because:

(1) the rents to stay there per day are high.

(2) there is so much competition.

(3) there are so many cheap Romanians etc. who offer a crap service but do so for very little and snap up most of the punters who are not particularly discerning and just want a cheap P&D.

(4) When a Sergei rents a cheap house in London and stuffs it full of 5 or 6 Romanian WGs who will go all in (plus esstrasss bby) for £100 ph, there is no way independent WGs who need to hire hotel rooms etc. can easily compete with that, so the economics most often don't make sense.

Hence, it is more difficult to become a 'rich' WG in London these days.

Those are some very good points. The fact is that there just aren't that many punters willing to pay the premium rates we see in London, most will happily visit the Roms you speak of.

On the other hand, the top London girls seem to be fully booked well in advance, so maybe things aren't that linear. Clearly, there's money to be made, perhaps not enough to get rich quick, but certainly enough to make a good living.

The challenge must be to keep regulars happy and returning often, as there's so much candy in the sweet shop!

Offline threechilliman

I suspect the number of prossies who have become wealthy are in a small minority  ... many will have had quite considerable amounts passing through their hands but for reasons already outlined the cash disappears as quickly as it is "earned"
Perhaps we should applaud those who have the common sense to invest their "profits" for the future and have a residual income for later life  :hi:

The above is true of women generally in my experience. They can get through a pile of notes faster than a lottery-winning punter......

Offline PepeMAGA

I think it's self limiting.
If they work a conveyor belt service they'll initially be earning a lot per week, but then either burn out or drop in service.
If they're more sensible they'll last longer, but not be earning the same per week.

Offline Haruki


Yes. I am. He is continually and gratuitously abusive, both to punters and WGs who are trying to engage in discussion (just this thread shows examples of both). He has been the same way for years. Very tiresome.

I can't understand why he hasn't been banned. No reviews in 15k posts means he is a leach on the rest of us who play fair then he runs round the board like a Rottweiler chewing a wasp

Offline freeze44

I can't understand why he hasn't been banned. No reviews in 15k posts means he is a leach on the rest of us who play fair then he runs round the board like a Rottweiler chewing a wasp

So report if so upset?? This been covered loads of times before. Really just get over it...can't see the problem  :unknown:

Offline myothernameis

How do we get him removed - he's wasting my time, and I'm sure the time of many others?

Oh someone got out of bed on the wrong side, and asking to get James  removed, is only going to cause you more problems

Easiest thing you can do, is to go to your profile, and put James on the ignore list, and then you wont see any of his posts

Offline daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,565
  • Likes: 396
  • Reviews: 24
I can't understand why he hasn't been banned. No reviews in 15k posts means he is a leach on the rest of us who play fair then he runs round the board like a Rottweiler chewing a wasp

Nobody gets banned just because a few members don't like what they post, you have a few choices - don't read what he posts - put him on ignore so you don't see his posts - or read them and put up with it.

Offline jayne75

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 17
  • Likes: 0
She's a fat old woman in her 50's so I called Bullshit on her earnings claims  :hi:

Of course she's welcome to provide a copy of her tax return to back up her claims  :sarcastic:
I'm just turned 43 and a size 12
I'm fully booked every day so I dont care what you think really, your always vile towards me, not sure why but ok.

Offline Haruki

Nobody gets banned just because a few members don't like what they post, you have a few choices - don't read what he posts - put him on ignore so you don't see his posts - or read them and put up with it.

Well those options are fine and are the admins choice but if everyone took James approach to reviewing you would quickly find there was no UK Punting

Offline daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,565
  • Likes: 396
  • Reviews: 24
Well those options are fine and are the admins choice but if everyone took James approach to reviewing you would quickly find there was no UK Punting

James has been a member for 8 years and UKP is getting stronger by the day, all without him posting a review, so much so Admin has, for the first time in it's history, appointed mods to assist with the running of it.

You really have no idea how any fora works do you? On any one it's the minority that actually actively contribute. I agree reviews are the 'life blood' of this site, however there is nothing in the rules that stipulate posting reviews are a prerequisite of being a member. There are definitive banning reasons but not posting reviews is not one of them, nor will anyone be banned just because another member doesn't like what they post (as long as it is within the rules). The ignore function is there for all to use.

Have a look at the indexing stats for the past year, bearing in mind the list is not exhaustive as only AW reviews can be indexed so the likes of Vivastreet, members who have indexed less than 150 etc aren't included. I'll leave you to add them up.

Hidden Image/Members Only



Offline hawkzville

I spoke to a quite well-known WG recently who has been around for years. She told me that it was very very difficult to make money in London these days because:

(1) the rents to stay there per day are high.

(2) there is so much competition.

(3) there are so many cheap Romanians etc. who offer a crap service but do so for very little and snap up most of the punters who are not particularly discerning and just want a cheap P&D.

(4) When a Sergei rents a cheap house in London and stuffs it full of 5 or 6 Romanian WGs who will go all in (plus esstrasss bby) for £100 ph, there is no way independent WGs who need to hire hotel rooms etc. can easily compete with that, so the economics most often don't make sense.

Hence, it is more difficult to become a 'rich' WG in London these days.



I don't know whether anyone remembers "Suzanne"? She was a tall-ish blonde-haired Polish girl (about 23-24 at the time) who had a very basic flat just off North End Road (by West Ken station); it must be 5-6 years ago, but maybe even longer than that now (time flies!)...… anyhow, I was a regular of hers for a while, probably seeing her 10-12 times in total.

During that time I got to know her quite well (or as well as you can get to know a WG).

Her story was one of focus; which is why i'm posting it.

She didn't want to be a WG for any other reason than to generate a capital sum (I forget exactly how much but think it was circa £150,000), which would be sufficient to build the home of her dreams in her Polish hometown, fund the remainder of her degree (she was studying economics) ie to effectively set herself up for life.

By utilising her understanding of economics she struck her hourly rate at a level to attract punters, but meticulously controlling the numbers of working hours per day (largely by building up regulars) so as to avoid burn-out. She ran a very tight ship over her outgoings/overheads, again from memory I believe it took the first hours work per day to meet key overheads (rent, phone etc). I remember we used to joke when I stayed for a 2-hour session that I'd helped to fund a pile of bricks, or a window in her house....in short then she put in the research and executed a business plan that she stuck to.

The point is that she was true to her word; once she hit her target she was gone and so far as I know retired happily back to the real world.

The relevance to this post though is that we'd talk alot during our time together as my background is also in economics and I was intrigued by her focus/dedication to her business plan. We discussed "get rich WG's"; I (naively) pointed out that she could certainly charge more, see more punters, stay in the UK longer etc etc ie using her business brain and amazing body to become "rich". Her answer was that the business model would potentially become flawed by altering the variables, ie increase/decrease price may alter punter frequency which may in turn lead to change in service levels etc and the knock on effect that would have on reputaion, feeding back into the equation causing a downward spiral . Her view was that her working as a WG was a project and like all projects had a beginning, a process and an end; the end being when she had "enough".

I completely saw her point; her service was quite exceptional for those that enjoy GFE as she made you feel totally "wanted" from minute one to minute sixty (or in my case increasingly minute one twenty), she very cleverly spaced out her appointments aware that a lot of punters would want to extend time, so able to do so (if she wanted to) without fear of double booking etc.

So, did being an escort make her rich? Certainly not in £ terms, probably yes in Zloty terms - but more importantly she was rich in personality, common sense, business acumen and ultimately achieving her goals in life, which in my book beats a stack of money hands down.

I genuinely hope that for her escorting is but a distant memory, that she is enjoying her dream life in Poland.

In business (for me) I have met way too many people who don't know the meaning of the word "enough"; chasing the capitalist dream is for most destined to end in tears - knowing when to step off the rollercoaster and enjoy life is the key to happiness, not a mountain of cash.




Offline BigD77

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 15
  • Likes: 0
This occurred to me during my poorer days when I didn't have enough money to satisfy my punting cravings. When an SP would waste time during my session I would think I'm paying like £2 per minute here. Like when they ask if you want a shower. A 4-minute shower will cost me £8. I remember when an agency girl wanted me to cum after around 35 mins so she could go elsewhere to make more money quicker. I was thinking I paid for an hour... losing like 1/3 of what I paid. Excuse me for that little rant

The cheapest rate I've seen is £60 per hour and that's £1 per minute. Nearly all charge more than that. People I know get £8-16 per hour worked. Even doctors don't make £60 per hour. I usually see 100+ per hour for a good looking girl. So far escorting seems like a lucrative career choice while you're still young if you can maintain enough clients.

When I have a fantasy to tick off the bucket list, I've even been charged 100+ per 30 mins, although I don't spend that much regularly for so short.

Jeez some guys don't think things through.

More likely scenario:

You email/text a girl at noon asking for a visit at 3pm, (because you expect girls to be available at times to suit you, rather than her saying, oh actually I can only squeeze you in 2-3pm) and she replies immediately, so the is not working that hour either.

You book an hour from 3.30pm, so you are covering say both the 3-4 slot and the 4-5 slot. 

You arrive 20 minutes late, perhaps after spending half an hour texting her asking for items off the "menu" or other benal requests, and since she does not have a waiting room and receptionist, she cannot have you around when the next booking turns up, so she cannot take another booking until at least 5 or 6pm, but is not available to answer the phone to accept it until you leave at 4.50pm

So she has to cover from noon to 5pm just to see you for an hour, that's if you turn up.

She also has rent etc to pay as mentioned in other posts, and, if she is working from home, would need to keep the place decent to avoid negative reviews on places like this. She may also need to maintain a website etc.

If she is working from a hotel, those costs would be extra too...

So no, noone with an IQ of more than 80 would think that she is actually earning £120 an hour, every hour of the "working day"

Offline freeze44

Jeez some guys don't think things through.

More likely scenario:

You email/text a girl at noon asking for a visit at 3pm, (because you expect girls to be available at times to suit you, rather than her saying, oh actually I can only squeeze you in 2-3pm) and she replies immediately, so the is not working that hour either.

You book an hour from 3.30pm, so you are covering say both the 3-4 slot and the 4-5 slot. 

You arrive 20 minutes late, perhaps after spending half an hour texting her asking for items off the "menu" or other benal requests, and since she does not have a waiting room and receptionist, she cannot have you around when the next booking turns up, so she cannot take another booking until at least 5 or 6pm, but is not available to answer the phone to accept it until you leave at 4.50pm

So she has to cover from noon to 5pm just to see you for an hour, that's if you turn up.

She also has rent etc to pay as mentioned in other posts, and, if she is working from home, would need to keep the place decent to avoid negative reviews on places like this. She may also need to maintain a website etc.

If she is working from a hotel, those costs would be extra too...

So no, noone with an IQ of more than 80 would think that she is actually earning £120 an hour, every hour of the "working day"

And no one with an IQ like yours would write such bolloxs.  :dash:

yobbra

  • Guest


I don't know whether anyone remembers "Suzanne"? She was a tall-ish blonde-haired Polish girl (about 23-24 at the time) who had a very basic flat just off North End Road (by West Ken station); it must be 5-6 years ago, but maybe even longer than that now (time flies!)...… anyhow, I was a regular of hers for a while, probably seeing her 10-12 times in total.

During that time I got to know her quite well (or as well as you can get to know a WG).

Her story was one of focus; which is why i'm posting it.

She didn't want to be a WG for any other reason than to generate a capital sum (I forget exactly how much but think it was circa £150,000), which would be sufficient to build the home of her dreams in her Polish hometown, fund the remainder of her degree (she was studying economics) ie to effectively set herself up for life.

By utilising her understanding of economics she struck her hourly rate at a level to attract punters, but meticulously controlling the numbers of working hours per day (largely by building up regulars) so as to avoid burn-out. She ran a very tight ship over her outgoings/overheads, again from memory I believe it took the first hours work per day to meet key overheads (rent, phone etc). I remember we used to joke when I stayed for a 2-hour session that I'd helped to fund a pile of bricks, or a window in her house....in short then she put in the research and executed a business plan that she stuck to.

The point is that she was true to her word; once she hit her target she was gone and so far as I know retired happily back to the real world.

The relevance to this post though is that we'd talk alot during our time together as my background is also in economics and I was intrigued by her focus/dedication to her business plan. We discussed "get rich WG's"; I (naively) pointed out that she could certainly charge more, see more punters, stay in the UK longer etc etc ie using her business brain and amazing body to become "rich". Her answer was that the business model would potentially become flawed by altering the variables, ie increase/decrease price may alter punter frequency which may in turn lead to change in service levels etc and the knock on effect that would have on reputaion, feeding back into the equation causing a downward spiral . Her view was that her working as a WG was a project and like all projects had a beginning, a process and an end; the end being when she had "enough".

I completely saw her point; her service was quite exceptional for those that enjoy GFE as she made you feel totally "wanted" from minute one to minute sixty (or in my case increasingly minute one twenty), she very cleverly spaced out her appointments aware that a lot of punters would want to extend time, so able to do so (if she wanted to) without fear of double booking etc.

So, did being an escort make her rich? Certainly not in £ terms, probably yes in Zloty terms - but more importantly she was rich in personality, common sense, business acumen and ultimately achieving her goals in life, which in my book beats a stack of money hands down.

I genuinely hope that for her escorting is but a distant memory, that she is enjoying her dream life in Poland.

In business (for me) I have met way too many people who don't know the meaning of the word "enough"; chasing the capitalist dream is for most destined to end in tears - knowing when to step off the rollercoaster and enjoy life is the key to happiness, not a mountain of cash.

Sounds just like the very naturally busty pretty blonde pole i remember from that era called Suzanne. She had her own website 'suzannelondonescort' or something like that?  She wasn't tall at all though like you said.  Very petite about 5'2'' the one i remember seeing several times.  Everything else ticks the box for her though.  She was stunning, very focused and the service was amazing.  Think she was £250 for 2 hours incall if it was the same girl.

James999

  • Guest
quickly find there was no UK Punting

What you fail to understand is if it wasn't for the members in the early days creating and promoting the site, and weeding out fakes and trolls then there would be no site to post reviews on, the site was created by Nik (Who doesn't post reviews) and taken over by Nik (who doesn't post reviews) the situation has been discussed at length and if you bother to search you will read Admins response to the posting of reviews and you will then see how stupid your comments are.

Remember the site was originally a forum in response to Pro$$ienet treatment of posters, reviews came later.

Stop telling Admin how to run his site, create your own site make up your own stupid rules and see how quick it fails.

Offline hawkzville

Sounds just like the very naturally busty pretty blonde pole i remember from that era called Suzanne. She had her own website 'suzannelondonescort' or something like that?  She wasn't tall at all though like you said.  Very petite about 5'2'' the one i remember seeing several times.  Everything else ticks the box for her though.  She was stunning, very focused and the service was amazing.  Think she was £250 for 2 hours incall if it was the same girl.


Thanks Yobbra; probably not the same girl (who may actually have been Suzanna not Suzanne on reflection - can't be sure - too many since!), anyhow my brain is for numbers rather than names, so I'm pretty certain she was 5 ft 7, £110 for an hour or £200 for two..... seems that the one you refer to shared a similar set of standards, which sadly seems missing nowadays.

yobbra

  • Guest

Thanks Yobbra; probably not the same girl (who may actually have been Suzanna not Suzanne on reflection - can't be sure - too many since!), anyhow my brain is for numbers rather than names, so I'm pretty certain she was 5 ft 7, £110 for an hour or £200 for two..... seems that the one you refer to shared a similar set of standards, which sadly seems missing nowadays.

Yes definitely different.  If my one was £110 for an hour would have been there every day i was in London.  If anyone know of the suzannelondonescort one i am talking about still works could you post a new link as her original twitter and website don't exist anymore so i assume she has retired. 
« Last Edit: May 30, 2019, 01:11:58 pm by yobbra »

SlamBoy

  • Guest
Jeez some guys don't think things through.

More likely scenario:

You email/text a girl at noon asking for a visit at 3pm, (because you expect girls to be available at times to suit you, rather than her saying, oh actually I can only squeeze you in 2-3pm) and she replies immediately, so the is not working that hour either.

You book an hour from 3.30pm, so you are covering say both the 3-4 slot and the 4-5 slot. 

You arrive 20 minutes late, perhaps after spending half an hour texting her asking for items off the "menu" or other benal requests, and since she does not have a waiting room and receptionist, she cannot have you around when the next booking turns up, so she cannot take another booking until at least 5 or 6pm, but is not available to answer the phone to accept it until you leave at 4.50pm

So she has to cover from noon to 5pm just to see you for an hour, that's if you turn up.

She also has rent etc to pay as mentioned in other posts, and, if she is working from home, would need to keep the place decent to avoid negative reviews on places like this. She may also need to maintain a website etc.

If she is working from a hotel, those costs would be extra too...

So no, noone with an IQ of more than 80 would think that she is actually earning £120 an hour, every hour of the "working day"

Wow. You sound like you really hate your clients.  :dash:

SlamBoy

  • Guest
Her answer was that the business model would potentially become flawed by altering the variables, ie increase/decrease price may alter punter frequency . . .

Ah! The price elasticity of demand!

You're welcome  :hi:

Offline hawkzville

Ah! The price elasticity of demand!

You're welcome  :hi:

That's the one indeed; though I didn't want to use the term just in case it was confused with the "tension on the knicker elasticity caused by groping punters" which is of course completely different.

SlamBoy

  • Guest
That's the one indeed; though I didn't want to use the term just in case it was confused with the "tension on the knicker elasticity caused by groping punters" which is of course completely different.

Indeed. Which such groping always leads to increasing diminishing marginal utility.

. . . I'll get my coat.

Offline hawkzville

Indeed. Which such groping always leads to increasing diminishing marginal utility.

. . . I'll get my coat.


Now you are just showing off.....!

Offline Private Parts

The same one as you, you really do back up the stereotype of dumb as fuck  :sarcastic:
Oh the irony.
 You hate anyone’s success. If an SP has made a go of it then good luck to them.
 :hi:

Offline no2punter

Depends on the one. Many of them squander the money on parties, designer clothing and drugs, but there definitely are some that have been saving up.

Offline bushman

I do think WG can earn a decent amount overtime. Will they become rich? Nae. Well off? Nae.
It's not part of prossie logic. Some, especially the younger SP, along with the current selfie lifestyle spent money on absolute shit. Ugly Mugs should do them a favour and start financial/hospitality training courses for the young WG.That would do them all good.

Offline kuck

Annual earnings don't seem to be much according to External Link/Members Only

< £30k

Offline tazz

No. i see 1 to 2 clients a day due to day job and the fact i dont want to burn out, so say 10 x £130 a week is £1300 times that by say 48 weeks and you get £62,400

my rent is 16000 a year alone , add bills council tax, phone bills internet etc and i easily say bye bye to £20k

so now we are at £42000 a year. take of tax (and yes before you start with the escorts dont pay tax shit)

and im on a normal wage.,....



The  blessing for me is ive been doing this 7 years, im not stupid, brought a house i rent out, have a day job with a good pension and havent had to fuck hundreds of cocks a day for it, just enough to be "well off"!

I plan to buy another house this year so im pretty much set for life money wise and then MAYBE retire lol

But i enjoy it and havent got jaded!

But you only do this part time, escorts who see 20-40 guys a week can easily be make £150K a year

Offline finn5555

But you only do this part time, escorts who see 20-40 guys a week can easily be make £150K a year

Take what ER says with a very large pinch of salt she is a pathological lier which has been proven on many occasions  :hi:

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
Take what ER says with a very large pinch of salt she is a pathological lier which has been proven on many occasions  :hi:
take what finn  says with a very large pinch of salt  hes is a online hater of me as proven many occasions.... :rolleyes:
Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

Offline finn5555

take what finn  says with a very large pinch of salt  hes is a online hater of me as proven many occasions.... :rolleyes:

I don’t hate you Rebecca just I can always see through your bullshit  :music:

Offline hermanmunster

I think I may be talking about different types of girls to those generally referred to on this thread.  I know very well one particular lady from Russia (a client of mine rather than the other way round).  She has earned £5,200 in the last 7 days week (from bookings that have been reviewed), she talks openly to me on a very regular basis and often refers to bookings that she must go and prepare for, and I know these bookings earn her at least £2,000.  Total so far £7,200.   Additionally she has mentioned several times this week that she is busy as she has several bookings, which over the last 7 days must total anywhere between £2-4,000.  So her income for the last week must be anywhere between £9,200 and £11,200.  Say £9,200, she works for 3 different agencies who all take 30% commission which would total £2,760.  So her minimum income for the last 7 days is £6,440.  If she works say 35 weeks per year (in practice will work more), this would be a minimum net income of £225,400 - pretty decent salary by anyone's standards - realistically it could easily be £300-350,000.

Offline BarryProudfoot

I think I may be talking about different types of girls to those generally referred to on this thread.  I know very well one particular lady from Russia (a client of mine rather than the other way round).  She has earned £5,200 in the last 7 days week (from bookings that have been reviewed), she talks openly to me on a very regular basis and often refers to bookings that she must go and prepare for, and I know these bookings earn her at least £2,000.  Total so far £7,200.   Additionally she has mentioned several times this week that she is busy as she has several bookings, which over the last 7 days must total anywhere between £2-4,000.  So her income for the last week must be anywhere between £9,200 and £11,200.  Say £9,200, she works for 3 different agencies who all take 30% commission which would total £2,760.  So her minimum income for the last 7 days is £6,440.  If she works say 35 weeks per year (in practice will work more), this would be a minimum net income of £225,400 - pretty decent salary by anyone's standards - realistically it could easily be £300-350,000.

It's allot of money to put in a suitcase back to Russia :hi:

Offline king tarzan

It's allot of money to put in a suitcase back to Russia :hi:

I have been told over the years by quite a few escorts if there loved one's ever discovered the source of there money there would be disowning, house burning, suicides, divorces...
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline BarryProudfoot

I have been told over the years by quite a few escorts if there loved one's ever discovered the source of there money there would be disowning, house burning, suicides, divorces...

What do they think when there love one arrives home with say 250k in the suitcase? Or suddenly buys a new house, drives around in a new car etc?

Mac Miller

  • Guest
This occurred to me during my poorer days when I didn't have enough money to satisfy my punting cravings. When an SP would waste time during my session I would think I'm paying like £2 per minute here. Like when they ask if you want a shower. A 4-minute shower will cost me £8. I remember when an agency girl wanted me to cum after around 35 mins so she could go elsewhere to make more money quicker. I was thinking I paid for an hour... losing like 1/3 of what I paid. Excuse me for that little rant

The cheapest rate I've seen is £60 per hour and that's £1 per minute. Nearly all charge more than that. People I know get £8-16 per hour worked. Even doctors don't make £60 per hour. I usually see 100+ per hour for a good looking girl. So far escorting seems like a lucrative career choice while you're still young if you can maintain enough clients.

When I have a fantasy to tick off the bucket list, I've even been charged 100+ per 30 mins, although I don't spend that much regularly for so short.

For  some ladies I enjoy giving my cash to  it's all about exchange rates I believe. They work like the proverbial trojan whilst here in 🇬🇧 but  back home in Thailand /China they are "millionaires" with possibly a rather nice property portfolio, and earning respect from their families.  Let's be honest would you lower yourself to wanking off a customer to pay your mother's medical bills. I'd euthenise mater  :angelgirl:
 

Offline king tarzan

What do they think when there love one arrives home with say 250k in the suitcase? Or suddenly buys a new house, drives around in a new car etc?

Cruise ships, jobs with big tips.... That's what I've been told..
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline cat1144

males will always pay for it.
even facking monkeys will  :lol:

External Link/Members Only


fitbrit

  • Guest
This occurred to me during my poorer days when I didn't have enough money to satisfy my punting cravings. When an SP would waste time during my session I would think I'm paying like £2 per minute here. Like when they ask if you want a shower. A 4-minute shower will cost me £8. I remember when an agency girl wanted me to cum after around 35 mins so she could go elsewhere to make more money quicker. I was thinking I paid for an hour... losing like 1/3 of what I paid. Excuse me for that little rant

The cheapest rate I've seen is £60 per hour and that's £1 per minute. Nearly all charge more than that. People I know get £8-16 per hour worked. Even doctors don't make £60 per hour. I usually see 100+ per hour for a good looking girl. So far escorting seems like a lucrative career choice while you're still young if you can maintain enough clients.

When I have a fantasy to tick off the bucket list, I've even been charged 100+ per 30 mins, although I don't spend that much regularly for so short.

Simple maths: say on average girl works 6 days a week: 3 clients per day, 1 hour each: average 120/h = 3 x 120 x 6 = £2,160 per week ( £9,360 per month / £112,320 a year, tax free ). Even if 10% - 20% up or down depending on how hard working is she, the range is £90k to £135k per year. Of course, this is gross of expenses which depends on each girl..

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: June 09, 2019, 01:16:13 pm by fitbrit »

Offline Tom.Punter

I spoke to a quite well-known WG recently who has been around for years. She told me that it was very very difficult to make money in London these days because:

(1) the rents to stay there per day are high.

(2) there is so much competition.

(3) there are so many cheap Romanians etc. who offer a crap service but do so for very little and snap up most of the punters who are not particularly discerning and just want a cheap P&D.

(4) When a Sergei rents a cheap house in London and stuffs it full of 5 or 6 Romanian WGs who will go all in (plus esstrasss bby) for £100 ph, there is no way independent WGs who need to hire hotel rooms etc. can easily compete with that, so the economics most often don't make sense.

Hence, it is more difficult to become a 'rich' WG in London these days.

Made me laugh  :sarcastic: .... Now UK SPs moan EE/foreigners take their job... They must have voted for Brexit

It's like when black cabs moan Uber drivers take their job. It's offer and demand. Adapt the offer, stop moaning.
« Last Edit: June 09, 2019, 05:25:32 pm by Tom.Punter »