Author Topic: Hollyjane23 - AW - Cramlington  (Read 3300 times)


18 review(s) for Hollyjane23  (10 positive, 5 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

mtrob99

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

£90 for 45 minute incall, location is a small second floor flat in cramlington with plenty of parking and was fairly quiet but it was daytime.
Easily arranged through AW got mobile number sent through with postcode texted when I arrived and was given door number.  Holly answered door in underwear covered with a small see through nightie, she has a fantastic figure i'd say was a size 8 and facially is ok too with light makeup.  Nice down to earth lass and quite chatty asked what I wanted offered a drink and then we proceeded. 

After paperwork was sorted we moved to the bedroom at this point Holly seemed very nervous as she had apparently a bad experience with a punter recently, started with light pecks no dfk of anykind i knew this anyway as its not on likes list, OWO followed which was good then RO to which she gushed all over the bed she had put a towel under but it didn't work! Cowgirl, doggie and missionary followed I was then intending to CIM but her pussy is very tight I simply could not/did not want to pull it out so came in the bag.  Overall a descent fuck with plenty off pushing back and enthusiasm in all positions tried.  Hollys pussy is totally bald and was very clean and fresh and very tight she got wet real guick from oral with one finger inserted and when she came she lifted her hips off the bed and gushed sweetness all over - that made the meet for me!

One word of caution however is that when I first entered I was told another punter was waiting outside I think she doublebooked thinking one of us wouldnt turn up droppung the £60 for my £90, Not sure if its her regular ploy or simply a late arrival.  Why i'm thinking this is Holly's first words upon opening the door was 'are you my 45 minutes' just something to be aware of when booking

Overall I personally would book again

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,335
  • Likes: 804
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Thanks for the review.
Not too keen on other punters hanging around though, sounds like she runs a conveyor belt system and that doesn't give time for her to shower properly.

Offline MME

There was another punter waiting outside after I left when I was there. Totally forgot to mention in my previous review.

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,335
  • Likes: 804
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
There was another punter waiting outside after I left when I was there. Totally forgot to mention in my previous review.

Definitely one for the blacklist.    :thumbsdown:

Offline Sar-Major

There was another punter waiting outside after I left when I was there. Totally forgot to mention in my previous review.

Definitely not good having a "Queue" outside your working premises. Defo one to "AVOID"  :scare:

 :hi: :hi:
Banned reason: Fantasy reviews. Using UKP name to push boundaries and attempt bareback & stalker
Banned by: daviemac

Offline cloud-nine

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 31
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
She has to be joking, it sounds like she might be taking double bookings in case one of them doesn't turn up.  :thumbsdown:

She also works as Megan of Allure so they might be taking bookings for her at the same time that she is arranging clients independently as Hollyjane23 via Adult Work.

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
Banned reason: Offering to make Fake Reviews
Banned by: 90125

AllAges

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I saw her very recently as Megan. I have not had time to post a review but I will chip in here to disagree with the OP. For me, facially, she is one of the ugliest and deformed looking WGs I have seen.

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,335
  • Likes: 804
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
I saw her very recently as Megan. I have not had time to post a review but I will chip in here to disagree with the OP. For me, facially, she is one of the ugliest and deformed looking WGs I have seen.

What are you talking about, how can you disagree with what the OP find attractive.    :wacko:   Try posting your own review instead of criticising other people's.

AllAges

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
What are you talking about, how can you disagree with what the OP find attractive.    :wacko:   Try posting your own review instead of criticising other people's.

Simples. The OP find her facial attractiveness ok, I don’t. Two valid opinions from two different punters.

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,335
  • Likes: 804
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Simples. The OP find her facial attractiveness ok, I don’t. Two valid opinions from two different punters.

Perhaps it would've been clearer if you'd said it was his opinion you were disagreeing with, not him.  Simples.

Offline Shearer1955

I saw her very recently as Megan. I have not had time to post a review but I will chip in here to disagree with the OP. For me, facially, she is one of the ugliest and deformed looking WGs I have seen.

Offering comments like this come across as vindictive and personal against the lass herself which offer no value whatsoever
I could say you come across as a bit of a cocksucker but of course its only an opinion  :unknown:

AllAges

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Perhaps it would've been clearer if you'd said it was his opinion you were disagreeing with, not him.  Simples.

A pretty obvious inference to make so I didn’t think I needed to spell it out. I will remember to be more clear next time. I have submitted my review now - apologies for not doing so sooner.

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,335
  • Likes: 804
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
A pretty obvious inference to make so I didn’t think I needed to spell it out. I will remember to be more clear next time. I have submitted my review now - apologies for not doing so sooner.

Just my opinion but I don't think there was any need to mention the OP, "I've seen her and thought she was ugly" would suffice.

Offline dubhcarr

thanks for the review OP one just gone straight into the bin.....hate these back to back operations...I always question hygiene if there is little time between punters    :vomit: