Author Topic: Li Massage - AVOID WASTE OF MONEY - Coventry  (Read 5729 times)

Offline Beamer


Offline NigelF

Seems a fair and helpful review to me  :unknown:

SlamBoy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Seems a fair and helpful review to me  :unknown:

Thank you Nigel F. I thought so too. And that from a very well respected member of UKP.  :thumbsup:

Offline houseboot

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,869
  • Likes: 36
  •  
  • Reviews: 48
Seems a fair and helpful review to me  :unknown:

The OP asked for objectivity which i gave him in Reply 36.

Unfortunately he didn't acknowledge that and continued with his rant at others.

Whatever credibility he had with his OP he has lost with his boorish behaviour since.

Online mr.bluesky

It's probably the first time he's ventured north of Watford the poor man's confused

Offline Sigma

Errrr . . . let me give it some thought Brainiac . . . ah that's right - it has been in the North whenever you are standing South of it  :dash: :dash: :dash:

Hidden Image/Members Only

Just let it go, all your going to do is get yourself banned at this rate.

SlamBoy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Just let it go, all your going to do is get yourself banned at this rate.

Yes - I notice you had 'reported' one of my posts in a failed attempt to get me banned. Luckily, Admin is a fair judge and has seen those type of tactics a million times.

Instead of engaging with the substantive elements of my objective and reasoned review - all you and your fluffy mates have done is try to pile on in defence of your beloved SP and attack me in an ad hominem way. It's absurd.

If you don't like objective non-fanboy reviews, that's fine - there is an alternative website for people who just want gushing fluffidom.


Offline Beamer

Reply 12 like reply 36 was a rational response but you couldn't leave it.
Your subsequent ranting and your description of West Midlands punters showed your real character.
It is your unrealistic and pathetic attempts to belittle other members that is, I feel, unnecessary.
I for one, am happy that you are not a regular contributor to West Midlands threads.
« Last Edit: March 28, 2019, 06:17:45 pm by Beamer »

Online mr.bluesky

Errrr . . . let me give it some thought Brainiac . . . ah that's right - it has been in the North whenever you are standing South of it  :dash: :dash:

Still doesn't make it in the north. A clue- it's called the midlands because it's in the middle of the country. I suggest when you get back to london you invest in some geography lessons :dash:

SlamBoy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Reply 12 like reply 36 was a rational response but you couldn't leave it.
Your subsequent ranting and your description of West Midlands punters showed your real character.
It is your unrealistic and pathetic attempts to belittle other members that is, I feel, unnecessary.
I for one, am happy that you are not a regular contributor to West Midlands threads.

You have not been able to justifiably criticise a SINGLE element of my objective and factual review. Not one.

It is a completely objective review, and Nigel F. (who is also objective) said the same thing. However, local fans (including you) of this SP have jumped on this thread and instead of engaging with the substantive elements of my review, have just piled on with Ad hominem attacks.

Not satisfied with just criticising me personally for writing the review (instead of the review) you then all piled on to 'report' me to Admin. You - reported me for being a 'troll' - which I clearly am not. It is pathetic.

Luckily, Admin has seen this sort of thing a million times and knows that these completely unjustifiable pile-ons occur from time to time. I'm happy to leave it in his hands as he knows I am not and have never have been a troll. - He will, however, see the reality of what has happened here - fluffy fanboys jumping on a negative review of an SP they wanted to protect. This board is for the protection of punters, not the protection of SPs - you need to remember that and look in the mirror.

« Last Edit: March 28, 2019, 06:37:35 pm by SlamBoy »

Offline Beamer

I have never seen the SP in question. Therefore cannot be a so called fan boy.
Did you bother to read or understand reply 12 and 36?
« Last Edit: March 28, 2019, 06:45:10 pm by Beamer »

Online scouting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,236
  • Likes: 280
  •  
  • Reviews: 182
I see. The lovey dovey donut tactic is the following:

An OP posts an objective review. It's negative. It is also factual. How to respond? Just a ridiculous ad hominem attack (look up what that means - you probably don't know latin in the North). How pathetic.

When I counter your assertions that "everyone knows there is no touching" with verifiable previous posts from the board that I relied on saying that touching was on offer, how do you respond? Just ignore it.

No wonder the West Midlands punting scene is so rubbish - you hobnailed-boot-pie-eating-navvies are satisfied with the worst of services and are grateful for it! So that's what you perpetuate! And you even defend it! Ridiculous!

Back to London for me.

Good, fuck off tosser

Offline Sigma

Also have never seen the service provider. You were reported for being a belligerent twat.

Offline shed

Li will be rubbing her hands with all this publicity and coverage. There will probably be a queue outside her shop to countenance the negative (justifiable or not) review

Offline BP

donughts

Point of order on your spelling

Just a ridiculous ad hominem attack (look up what that means - you probably don't know latin in the North).

Geography ain't your strong point either, eh?

I read through this and thought yeah....fluffies do seem to be defending her a bit
but then you have to try and have keyboard fisticuffs and lost it

Still...if I'm ever there (in the middle part of the country - you know....the Midlands) I'll be giving her a miss so thanks for that