xxhothannahxx. Newcastle. Let down at the last minute.

[Jack Flash]

I have posted this report to just add to the profile on this girl. You can make your own minds up about her having read the selection of positive, negative and this neutral review.

As I was in Newcastle for a conference I decided to arrange an early morning outcall meeting with a WG. I put a Reverse Booking on AW and Hannah was the second reply I got. She had 4 pos and 3 neg reviews on UKP but I decided to take a chance and messaged her 5 days before the proposed meet. I asked if she could definitely make the 8am meeting, if she OK with owo and cim and with my dress requests. She replied that she was fine with all of those and sent me her phone number as well.

As agreed I tried to put in a booking but she was not ‘available’ at the desired time. I asked her to change her availability but she said she was unable to do it (really?). She said again that she was OK to meet as arranged.

Two days before, I texted her requesting a reply. Nothing. The day before the meeting I messaged her on AW and asked her to reply to my text so I knew I had the right number. She replied on AW but still no text. At 18:15 (the day before the meet) I messaged her on AW ‘Please text me if we are still on for tomorrow’. No reply. At about 22:30 I logged on to AW to find a message sent by her at 21:52 saying ’Mother Nature has called….’ and ‘I hope you have enough time to find someone to substitute’.

Of course by then it was far too late to try and find someone to come out the following morning at 8am.

In about 200 punts over 13 years this has been the excuse about 5 or 6 times. Almost always with little or no notice. I thought about a negative for this but decided to back down to a neutral. In this business I find it difficult to believe that a WG does not know roughly when her period is due. If it is possible that it may occur at a time of a booking then the WG should let the punter know of that possibility and allow them to either cancel or take a chance.

[maxxblue]

I thought about a negative for this but decided to back down to a neutral. In this business I find it difficult to believe that a WG does not know roughly when her period is due. If it is possible that it may occur at a time of a booking then the WG should let the punter know of that possibility and allow them to either cancel or take a chance.

Why? 

Just wondering what your rationale is for giving neutral over negative, given your comments?

[Jack Flash]

Why? 

Just wondering what your rationale is for giving neutral over negative, given your comments?

Hmmm... good question. Her comms on AW were good and she did seem keen to meet. I suppose I got the impression that she is just a bit disorganised and I did like the sound of her from the positive reviews which were the most recent. The negative reviews all seemed to be when she was with Allure and further in the past. What it comes down to is would I give her a second chance and in this case I would. However to be on the safe side I would make it an early evening meeting to allow for an agency plan B.

[waynekerr600]

I've seen Hannah and had a really good experience.

I guess from the reviews that she's still a little inconsistent which is a shame.

I've been wanting to see her again but her incall seems to be quite limited now.

[Abs]

I might be wrong but I’ve always assumed that SPs are on hormonal contraceptives which, to the best of my knowledge, means that they either shouldn’t get periods or should be able to control when they start and stop (depending on exactly what they’re using).

I would assume this excuse is bollocks.

[daviemac]

I might be wrong but I’ve always assumed that SPs are on hormonal contraceptives which, to the best of my knowledge, means that they either shouldn’t get periods or should be able to control when they start and stop (depending on exactly what they’re using).

I would assume this excuse is bollocks.

What gives you that idea? What makes you think all prostitutes use the same form of contraception. If you know anything about women you would know periods can start early or late.

I'm not saying that the excuse in this case is correct but it is a possibility, if it had happened to me it would have been a negative. As ever though it's the OP's choice how he rates it.

That's not even mentioning the ones who just shove a sponge up and work through their periods.   

[Abs]

What gives you that idea? What makes you think all prostitutes use the same form of contraception. If you know anything about women you would know periods can start early or late.

I'm not saying that the excuse in this case is correct but it is a possibility, if it had happened to me it would have been a negative. As ever though it's the OP's choice how he rates it.

That's not even mentioning the ones who just shove a sponge up and work through their periods.   

Like I said, I might be wrong - and if you know of SPs who use tampons then I clearly am wrong. But I assumed that they all use hormonal contraceptives to minimise chances of getting pregnant. Condoms are not 100% effective and given the number of times an SP is presumably having guys pop into a condom inside her every day, the overall chances of getting pregnant must be relatively high compared to a non SP. And I know that hormonal methods aren’t perfect either but the combination with condoms massively lowers that risk.

Of course, if nature is allowed to take its course, periods can come early or late. But like I said, I had presumed that nature wasn’t being allowed to take its course.

[daviemac]

Like I said, I might be wrong - and if you know of SPs who use tampons then I clearly am wrong. But I assumed that they all use hormonal contraceptives to minimise chances of getting pregnant. Condoms are not 100% effective and given the number of times an SP is presumably having guys pop into a condom inside her every day, the overall chances of getting pregnant must be relatively high compared to a non SP. And I know that hormonal methods aren’t perfect either but the combination with condoms massively lowers that risk.

Of course, if nature is allowed to take its course, periods can come early or late. But like I said, I had presumed that nature wasn’t being allowed to take its course.

The only way the 'pill' stops a woman's period is if she continues to take it during the week she's supposed to stop. They take it for 3 weeks then have a week without during which time they are supposed to have their period. Never 'set in stone' when that happens or for how long though. Some packets only have 21 pills in, others have an extra 7 'sugar' pills so it keeps them in the habit of taking them over the 28 day period.

I never said I know SP's who use tampons, I said there's some who shove a sponge up and continue to work during their periods.  Google is your friend if you don't know what that is.

[Abs]

The only way the 'pill' stops a woman's period is if she continues to take it during the week she's supposed to stop. They take it for 3 weeks then have a week without during which time they are supposed to have their period. Never 'set in stone' when that happens or for how long though. Some packets only have 21 pills in, others have an extra 7 'sugar' pills so it keeps them in the habit of taking them over the 28 day period.

I never said I know SP's who use tampons, I said there's some who shove a sponge up and continue to work during their periods.  Google is your friend if you don't know what that is.

You are describing the combined pill which is taken 3 weeks on and 1 week off. And I agree it’s not set in stone when exactly the lady will come on but you can certainly plan around it, there’s not going to be any surprises.

But you also have the progesterone only pill which you take continuously without break as well as the mirena coil, implants and injections which all stop periods altogether.

I’m not going to google sponges, I’m worried I won’t be able to unsee what I might see. It was an assumption that they are the same as tampons so fair play, I’m wrong again on that one. But surely they work along the same principles as tampons as in they soak up blood. And I wasn’t aware that SPs use things like this and carry on working. So even if you don’t personally know any who do, if you are aware that it does happen then my initial assumption that they all use hormones was wrong.

[daviemac]

You are describing the combined pill which is taken 3 weeks on and 1 week off. And I agree it’s not set in stone when exactly the lady will come on but you can certainly plan around it, there’s not going to be any surprises.

But you also have the progesterone only pill which you take continuously without break as well as the mirena coil, implants and injections which all stop periods altogether.

I’m not going to google sponges, I’m worried I won’t be able to unsee what I might see. It was an assumption that they are the same as tampons so fair play, I’m wrong again on that one. But surely they work along the same principles as tampons as in they soak up blood. And I wasn’t aware that SPs use things like this and carry on working. So even if you don’t personally know any who do, if you are aware that it does happen then my initial assumption that they all use hormones was wrong.

It's a bit pointless getting into a debate about the different types of contraception available. I just think it's a little naive to assume all prostitutes use the same form of contraception and never have periods.

You would find it very difficult to have any sort of sexual activity if a girl has a tampon in, you may not even know she has a sponge in so whilst they do a similar job the have very different uses.  You only have to read SAAFE to know they give each other advice on how to continue working during their periods.

This game isn't for the faint hearted and it pays to know, as far as possible, the ins and outs of it all.

[Abs]

It's a bit pointless getting into a debate about the different types of contraception available. I just think it's a little naive to assume all prostitutes use the same form of contraception and never have periods.

I agree, it is a bit pointless arguing about this isn’t it. And it probably was naive on my part but hormonal methods are the only thing that make sense to me to minimise risk of pregnancy. But I suppose the risk is still fairly low and different people will prioritise things differently.

[Jack Flash]

I agree, it is a bit pointless arguing about this isn’t it. And it probably was naive on my part but hormonal methods are the only thing that make sense to me to minimise risk of pregnancy. But I suppose the risk is still fairly low and different people will prioritise things differently.

If you are interested, thanks to daviemac, I have just had my eyes opened and been educated by reading this SAAFE forum thread on 'Working during your period'.

External Link/Members Only