External Link/Members OnlyI had been looking at this WG for some time and was crawling up the walls so decided to bite the bullet.
Her photos look fantastic, but lets face it, at early 50s, they were either shopped or many years younger. But still, if she wasn't too far off those, she was definitely worth a punt.
Coms: Very good. Lauren speaks eloquently (well, compared to others, anyway) and has a somewhat alluring voice on the phone. She asked me when and where, what sort of stuff I liked, and her response to my requests were welcoming. No probs there whatsoever. Made the booking and she double checked that I was coming and asked me to call an hour or so before the booking to confirm. I did and she was fine.
Accommodation: She is some way from Richmond, which was fine as it was no difference for me. I won't say where she said she was as she obviously puts Richmond in to hide her real area. But when she said where she was, and on giving me actual directions, it turns out she likes to say she is in more celubrious areas than she actually is. Although, it is a very gentrified area anyway.. so no worries. Her flat is in a nice, purpose built complex and it is reasonably discrete (in winter), though in summer, it would probably feel a little less so.
I parked and called her; she gave me directions to the flat, which is gnd floor. As I was approachng the doorway to the set of flats she lived in, the door opened and her head popped out... I sped up a bit and entered the hallway, the front door to her flat to the immediate left. On entering, the bedroom is the first on the left and it was a little unkempt and smelled of cigarette smoke - a bit of a turn off for me.. but otherwise no worse than many others I had been to,
The WG: Well, as I mentioned, with photos like that and an early 50's girl, one would be daft to think they weren't shopped or fakes. I think they are the latter. She is slim and her boobs are around the same dimensions.. but that's where the similarity ends. I expected her to be a bit flabbier - and she was - but not too much. But the proportions were completely off. There is no way her legs were ever that well proportioned and her torso was definitely more compressed. The face is the photos is way younger than it is in real life. I also doubt her claim to be early 50's, unless she means she was born in the early 50s.. Her face sort of gave it away, but her skin cellulite and muscle tone was of someone a bit older - I would say very late 50s or early 60s. Shame, as I don't mind older ladies, but I have to be in the right frame of mind (and they have to have a few more curves). At this stage, I should have walked, but as I said, I was walking up the walls. Also, she is quite short - I would say 5' to 5'1".
The punt: Well, it was pretty average. BJ was covered, which I don't mind, and it was OK - nothing great. We did sex in the usual positions; not bad - nothing to write home about. When we finished and I was cleaned up, we had a little chat and I thanked her and left.
Would I see her again? To be honest, for the notes, I thought the time was a waste of cash. But, on reflection, if there was nothing else available and I was climbing those walls again, I would think about it.
Why didn't I rate her as negative? Well, I was expecting misrepresentation - maybe not quite as much as it seemed... And she really did put in an effort - can't fault her for that. And she is a lovely lady - no question.. And since this caper is horses for courses, I didn't think it reallyh warranted a negative.
