Author Topic: Sweet Anal Bammy, Thai - Edgeware Rd - unenergetic but damn that bod  (Read 3035 times)


15 review(s) for Sweet Anal PATTIE (12 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Sinz]

Offline samtor

I went to see Bammy on the strength of DH's review - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=242592.msg2481519#msg2481519.  I adore petite Thai girls.  And frankly Bammy is one of the best looks wise I have come across in a while.  I prefer a more sensual GFE than PSE so his warnings about being "vanilla" didn't bother me that much.  I did like his reports of great DFK.

She was quite quiet and reserved when I arrived.  I greeted her with a bit of warm pleasantries asking about her day and she smiled a bit and started to warm.  Off with the clothes and she immediately started the sensual kissing me on my chest and working her way down to my crotch.  It was truly slow and sensual.  She was a bit surprised and confused when I turned the tables and got her to lie on her back (her English is weak) where I could savour those fleshy mountains on her chest, her pencil eraser nipples and then work my way down to her perfectly smooth lady bits.  She immediately settled into enjoying my RO and it took a little while, but she was clearly enjoying herself (gently nudging my head to different positions, pulling her clit to a better position), gentle sighs.  Eventually, she worked herself up with a bit of writhing, clenched her thighs around my ears, and pushed me away while her hips jerked gently and she let out a little gasp.  Delightful.

External Link/Members Only

We then moved onto sex in all the positions.  She has a nice big mirror which made it easier to enjoy all her ravishing beauty.  I finished on her chest and we collapsed for an extended cuddle where she kept caressing me.  Absolutely wonderful sesh.

Comms - Spot on.  Quick response.  Clear directions.

Price - £100 for 30 min

I hadn't noticed that Dragon had also posted a Negative review of Bammy.  Actually, both Dragon's and DH's reviews are quite accurate.  A gorgeous girl with a vanilla/passive service.  It depends on how you weigh up these things.  For me, her body was near perfection.  So smooth, taught, trim.  She wasn't swinging from the chandeliers, but she smiled at me, was warm, attentive.  That's enough for me.

A few problems.  Both her AW profile and DH noted "DFK", but as much as I tried she was not doing much of that (light kissing).  Her profile also advertises "Anal", but when I was doing doggie, I asked her if she would like some anal and said firmly "No" that she doesn't like it at all.  Her profile does over egg her service and offering, but the pictures are 100% her.

As for the haters who chimed in to the previous reviews, Dragon's review was very legitimate and accurate, and she is nothing like a "boy".


Offline bukowski

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 516
  • Likes: 2
  •  
  • Reviews: 5
I went to see Bammy on the strength of DH's review - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=242592.msg2481519#msg2481519.  I adore petite Thai girls.  And frankly Bammy is one of the best looks wise I have come across in a while.  I prefer a more sensual GFE than PSE so his warnings about being "vanilla" didn't bother me that much.  I did like his reports of great DFK.

She was quite quiet and reserved when I arrived.  I greeted her with a bit of warm pleasantries asking about her day and she smiled a bit and started to warm.  Off with the clothes and she immediately started the sensual kissing me on my chest and working her way down to my crotch.  It was truly slow and sensual.  She was a bit surprised and confused when I turned the tables and got her to lie on her back (her English is weak) where I could savour those fleshy mountains on her chest, her pencil eraser nipples and then work my way down to her perfectly smooth lady bits.  She immediately settled into enjoying my RO and it took a little while, but she was clearly enjoying herself (gently nudging my head to different positions, pulling her clit to a better position), gentle sighs.  Eventually, she worked herself up with a bit of writhing, clenched her thighs around my ears, and pushed me away while her hips jerked gently and she let out a little gasp.  Delightful.

External Link/Members Only

We then moved onto sex in all the positions.  She has a nice big mirror which made it easier to enjoy all her ravishing beauty.  I finished on her chest and we collapsed for an extended cuddle where she kept caressing me.  Absolutely wonderful sesh.

Comms - Spot on.  Quick response.  Clear directions.

Price - £100 for 30 min

I hadn't noticed that Dragon had also posted a Negative review of Bammy.  Actually, both Dragon's and DH's reviews are quite accurate.  A gorgeous girl with a vanilla/passive service.  It depends on how you weigh up these things.  For me, her body was near perfection.  So smooth, taught, trim.  She wasn't swinging from the chandeliers, but she smiled at me, was warm, attentive.  That's enough for me.

A few problems.  Both her AW profile and DH noted "DFK", but as much as I tried she was not doing much of that (light kissing).  Her profile also advertises "Anal", but when I was doing doggie, I asked her if she would like some anal and said firmly "No" that she doesn't like it at all.  Her profile does over egg her service and offering, but the pictures are 100% her.

As for the haters who chimed in to the previous reviews, Dragon's review was very legitimate and accurate, and she is nothing like a "boy".

`Haters`?

come now
i made a simple observation on the look of her legs

there's nothing for you to leap into defense of surely?
i think you seem overly sensitive on this matter

though you have prompted me to read the previous reviews and found this gem among them


`She mentioned a condom at this point but I enjoy R/O and asked her to lay back. She just about understood but asked me to be "gentle, very gentle". I tried to collaborate but she kept pulling further up the bed so I couldn't get to her clit. Could've been genuine or ... does she have no clit ?!?  :scare: The thought entered my mind with this one but I found her quite feminine overall so...  :unknown:`


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=155437.0


at the very least it would seem some skepticism is warranted no?

after all
it's not as if it's unheard of is it?

sp's who were previously boys, presenting themselves as always having been girls





Banned reason: No reviews in 5 years, refuses to explain when asked, fair enough
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline samtor

`Haters`?

come now
i made a simple observation on the look of her legs

there's nothing for you to leap into defense of surely?
i think you seem overly sensitive on this matter


Calm down.  Yes, the term was a bit strong and meant more tongue-in-cheek than seriously condemning.  There is a lot of "whatever you want to call it" of folks accusing WGs of being a TG (instead of saying she looks a bit masculine) and of accusing posters as being shills/pimps/white knights so being a bit enthusiastic.
« Last Edit: March 22, 2019, 01:42:53 pm by samtor »

Offline Muzmuz

`Haters`?

come now
i made a simple observation on the look of her legs

there's nothing for you to leap into defense of surely?
i think you seem overly sensitive on this matter

though you have prompted me to read the previous reviews and found this gem among them


`She mentioned a condom at this point but I enjoy R/O and asked her to lay back. She just about understood but asked me to be "gentle, very gentle". I tried to collaborate but she kept pulling further up the bed so I couldn't get to her clit. Could've been genuine or ... does she have no clit ?!?  :scare: The thought entered my mind with this one but I found her quite feminine overall so...  :unknown:`


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=155437.0


at the very least it would seem some skepticism is warranted no?

after all
it's not as if it's unheard of is it?

sp's who were previously boys, presenting themselves as always having been girls

You’re barking up the wrong tree with this one.

The previous review you’ve quoted refers to a different person. Her name was Crystal and at the time there was some genuine suspicion she was a post op.

I think the reason you’ve made a mistake is because the profile has been recycled by the CAPS LOCK PIMP.

Bammy, the latest featured lady of this profile is definitely a woman

Offline samtor

You’re barking up the wrong tree with this one.

The previous review you’ve quoted refers to a different person. Her name was Crystal and at the time there was some genuine suspicion she was a post op.

I think the reason you’ve made a mistake is because the profile has been recycled by the CAPS LOCK PIMP.

Bammy, the latest featured lady of this profile is definitely a woman

Ah, that could be.  Didn't notice because when I went to the link it pointed to Bammy and because the description sounded like her.  Thanks for clearing up.

Offline bukowski

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 516
  • Likes: 2
  •  
  • Reviews: 5
interesting

so who's who?

they all have the same pics (today)
Banned reason: No reviews in 5 years, refuses to explain when asked, fair enough
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline bukowski

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 516
  • Likes: 2
  •  
  • Reviews: 5
ah i think i get it now

the Crystal profiles had different pics before?
Banned reason: No reviews in 5 years, refuses to explain when asked, fair enough
Banned by: Iloveoral