Author Topic: Blake123471 Guildford  (Read 1544 times)


3 review(s) for Blake123471 (2 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline ck74

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

First things first: Blake has a great body, very tall and I am sure can be wicked- but the punt was somewhat marred by our mutual inability to get the old boy working- so it ended up in my first awkward ending. I am not sure how long Blake has been around (her profile suggests a year) but I got the feeling she was a little surprised too- and that just compounded the old boy's fright :) One good thing- I think I am veering towards younger girls who kiss!

Blake usually works in Bournemouth- so the Guildford visit was a chance and one that coincided nicely with a quiet time at work. I've been looking for someone I can walk to so this would be perfect (as is the location if anyone knows any girls regularly at the station!)

Comms: responsive early on to get booking done- when it came to confirming when I was 5 away, it went quiet so I was lingering outside for 10 minutes. Apparently she didn't check her phone, and when we went inside she wasn't sure if I was 30 mins or (my usual) 45 mins.

Cost: £130 for 45 mins: as it turns out this was overpriced for what was on offer- had I performed or not-  by way of explanation, and as I have posted before - for some reason I always worry an hour will be too long (awkward convos or I'm not much of a second timer!), and 30 minutes too short (I do like a massage first to settle down)

Location: block of new build flats at the end of Guildford station main car park. Long Stay is charged by the day so you should look to park in town and walk. The room was good enough- shared with another girl (who came into the room by accident after I got changed to leave but I wasn't that fussed at that point). Shower available- although hadn't been washed down/plug pulled from someone's bath earlier as still shallow pool left.

Girl: Blake is early 40's, tanned, tall and a touch of Essex (or South Coast) about her. I imagine (not in a bad way) she has a trampy mouth :) she certainly looks after herself- and fair play- bit big (tall) and heavy for me- so I realised I like perhaps daintier girls. She has a great pair of tits- no idea if false as they didn't come out of her lacy teddy bodysuit which was a shame.

The meet: Blake isn't hugely passionate- does feel a bit functional. There as no kissing- I got shown the cheek early on. She went straight to OWO (very good, not spectacular, but good effort and eyes lifted up) and then 69. She tasted great so that was a bonus (fortunately for later :)) We then moved to doggy. Again- because she is big (as in boned, certainly not fat) it was a challenge to go deep as I wanted and I've had more supple girls. It was fine, and she looks good- but we turned to mish and the lack of engagement left the old boy weakening. So we spent the next 10 minutes mixing between RO (her sitting on me) with me wanking, her wanking me, me wanking me in her mouth and so on. To be fair she rode my tongue well, but the rest was a bit of last minute hope rather than anything else. I just didn't fancy her.

Laughed, called it a day, shower and off not before I heard another punter coming in to see the other girl and I snuck out. I think girls who tour are clearly busy (which is fine) but that makes me feel part of a revolving door more so - again, it was useful to know what I don't like as much as what I do.

Summary: good body- going through the motions- bit toppy on price.

I wouldn't visit again.

Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
Girl: Blake is early 40's, tanned, tall and a touch of Essex (or South Coast) about her. I imagine (not in a bad way) she has a trampy mouth :) she certainly looks after herself- and fair play- bit big (tall) and heavy for me- so I realised I like perhaps daintier girls. She has a great pair of tits- no idea if false as they didn't come out of her lacy teddy bodysuit which was a shame.

The meet: Blake isn't hugely passionate- does feel a bit functional. There as no kissing- I got shown the cheek early on. She went straight to OWO (very good, not spectacular, but good effort and eyes lifted up) and then 69. She tasted great so that was a bonus (fortunately for later :)) We then moved to doggy. Again- because she is big (as in boned, certainly not fat)

I wouldn't visit again.

Cheers for the review ck, I have to admit looking at her ridiculously over-photoshopped & altered pictures that you could presume that what you saw in them would not resemble what you met. She's obviously a big unit.

The picture I've posted from her profile shows signs of everything from the neck down being altered with photo-manipulation in some way. Her arms, chest, clevage, midrift, waist, thighs & legs. In this picture she's changing alot of things !!  :sarcastic:

I think your review is honest & fair - I agree touring WG's, particularly Air BnB & hotel bookers try to cram in as many punters as might be interested on the day.

As I have been reminded before, punting is not for the squeamish.

Thanks again for taking the time to write this up   :hi:





Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline sailor3

Thanks for the review CK. If you are looking for someone smaller at the same location, then see my review on Cara.

Offline Lammy

Was this at Pandora's Little Secret?

Offline ck74

Was this at Pandora's Little Secret?

Nope- direct with the SP from AW search although I see she is on Pandora’s website. I haven’t tried that agency- any good?

Offline Lammy

Nope- direct with the SP from AW search although I see she is on Pandora’s website. I haven’t tried that agency- any good?

Alright I see. And no I haven't tried it either, was wondering as her pricing was different to Pandora's pricing's that's all. But I have seen her a few times when she was at MK but I guess she has full indie now?