Author Topic: Georgie masquerade girls  (Read 3632 times)

Offline jay-north east

No reviews on here but just wondering if anyone has seen her and not posted a review yet? Thinking of booking but always wary unless some positives on here.

Offline johnny34

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,036
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 41
« Last Edit: November 21, 2018, 08:23:59 pm by johnny34 »

Offline tynetunnel

Considerably less expensive through the agency... what’s that about?  :unknown:

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,956
  • Likes: 772
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Considerably less expensive through the agency... what’s that about?  :unknown:

Another one who only wants camming via AW so sets prices to deter escort enquiries. Loads do it.   :hi:

If it was just £10 or £20 more she'd be one of the greedy twats who aren't happy to keep the saved commission.

Offline jay-north east

Thanks for the aw link. I didn’t realise she was on there. She looks great but I’m not sure. Not sure why but I’m getting the impression of someone who is hot but I bet the service isn’t as good as her looks.

Offline ProfessorYaffle

Thanks for the aw link. I didn’t realise she was on there. She looks great but I’m not sure. Not sure why but I’m getting the impression of someone who is hot but I bet the service isn’t as good as her looks.

I'll take a chance on her, she looks gorgeous. I actually had a booking arranged with her last week but she cancelled her shift and I saw Niomi instead. I would have seen her this Saturday but I've already got a booking arranged with someone else.

Offline simone_raven


Offline johnny34

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,036
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 41

Offline jay-north east

I'll take a chance on her, she looks gorgeous. I actually had a booking arranged with her last week but she cancelled her shift and I saw Niomi instead. I would have seen her this Saturday but I've already got a booking arranged with someone else.
I might have to take one for the team this Saturday then if I can.


Offline jay-north east

Also at Premium now aswell:
External Link/Members Only
Apparently with premium from 5pm at a SR1 postcode but masquerade say she was working until “late” in Darlington!

Offline Slaine

Apparently with premium from 5pm at a SR1 postcode but masquerade say she was working until “late” in Darlington!

Might use Lewis Hamilton as her driver  :cool:

Offline bobby79

No reviews on here but just wondering if anyone has seen her and not posted a review yet? Thinking of booking but always wary unless some positives on here.

Guys booked her today so shall let you know on experience.

Offline ProfessorYaffle

Guys booked her today so shall let you know on experience.

Fantastic, don't keep us in suspense for too long!

Offline waynekerr600


Offline Poolieman

On this upcoming Wednesday she seems to be working for Premium from 12pm to 12am in Sunderland and from 4pm to late in Stockton for Masquerade  :rolleyes:

Well she was earlier. Now not working for Premium that day.
« Last Edit: November 24, 2018, 08:45:28 pm by Poolieman »

Offline Mixedracegeordie

Link: External Link/Members Only

Think this is her AW profile aswell:  External Link/Members Only

If that AW profile is her and you search the number on here it bribgs up a clearer face pic but more worryingly she's previously provided BB on AW....

Offline OscarC

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,420
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 40
If that AW profile is her and you search the number on here it bribgs up a clearer face pic but more worryingly she's previously provided BB on AW....

How do you know that she has?

Offline johnny34

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,036
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 41
How do you know that she has?

If you type in her Aw number into the search bar it does infact bring up another thread which has a face pic & bb listed.

Offline OscarC

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,420
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 40
If you type in her Aw number into the search bar it does infact bring up another thread which has a face pic & bb listed.

Cheers, should have thought about doing that, brain not working early on a Sunday!

One for the NEVER LIST.   :vomit:


Offline waynekerr600

If you type in her Aw number into the search bar it does infact bring up another thread which has a face pic & bb listed.

Good spot.

Bugger. Was looking good up to that point.

Offline Jibbi

It appears that BB issue is when the profile was based in London and for a cam profile rather than escort profile.

Read the comments on that thread and you'll see.

The number of cam profiles that advertise bareback is quite common so don't think it's fair to tar this escort with suggestions she offered it as an escort.

Offline waynekerr600

It appears that BB issue is when the profile was based in London and for a cam profile rather than escort profile.

Read the comments on that thread and you'll see.

The number of cam profiles that advertise bareback is quite common so don't think it's fair to tar this escort with suggestions she offered it as an escort.

It's the doubt that causes the problem. Would she offer it behind closed doors? I assume she must have had a clear STI test since but there's still that doubt that she may have done it with the last punter.

The overlapping availabilities was looking a bit iffy too suggesting to me that this could be one to let you down.

Offline Sar-Major

It's the doubt that causes the problem. Would she offer it behind closed doors? I assume she must have had a clear STI test since but there's still that doubt that she may have done it with the last punter.

The overlapping availabilities was looking a bit iffy too suggesting to me that this could be one to let you down.

There's always the chance she doesn't give a fuck what she passes on to others if it tests are positive...............  :scare: :scare: :scare:

 :hi: :hi:
Banned reason: Fantasy reviews. Using UKP name to push boundaries and attempt bareback & stalker
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Jibbi

It's the doubt that causes the problem. Would she offer it behind closed doors? I assume she must have had a clear STI test since but there's still that doubt that she may have done it with the last punter.

The overlapping availabilities was looking a bit iffy too suggesting to me that this could be one to let you down.

Having doubt is fair enough, guess you can say the same for most escorts. For this one in particular, it's different to saying she offered it previously when there's nothing to go by really. It was a cam profile going by them comments.

Offline simone_raven


Offline Kev3773

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,063
  • Likes: 29
  •  
  • Reviews: 90

Offline FLYING BLUE


What review  :unknown:

The one that was promised earlier in the thread by 'Bobby' :hi:

Offline Sar-Major


What review  :unknown:

See reply No. 12, and the feker logged in yesterday. :dash: :dash: :dash:

 :hi: :hi:
Banned reason: Fantasy reviews. Using UKP name to push boundaries and attempt bareback & stalker
Banned by: daviemac

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,956
  • Likes: 772
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
See reply No. 12, and the feker logged in yesterday. :dash: :dash: :dash:

 :hi: :hi:

I'd forgotten about him as well, must be an age thing.   :(

Offline simone_raven

Just checked out her verification photo. Not even that nice

Offline Sar-Major

I'd forgotten about him as well, must be an age thing.   :(

Well your getting NO younger "Sonny Jim" that's for fekin sure.  :rolleyes:    :D :D :D

 :hi: :hi:
Banned reason: Fantasy reviews. Using UKP name to push boundaries and attempt bareback & stalker
Banned by: daviemac

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,956
  • Likes: 772
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Well your getting NO younger "Sonny Jim" that's for fekin sure.  :rolleyes:    :D :D :D

 :hi: :hi:

How right you are.   :D

Offline bushman

It appears that BB issue is when the profile was based in London and for a cam profile rather than escort profile.

Read the comments on that thread and you'll see.

The number of cam profiles that advertise bareback is quite common so don't think it's fair to tar this escort with suggestions she offered it as an escort.
I disagree with you. The thread that I see list the services she included on her profile when she started out. It doesn't say "cam" only. :thumbsdown:

Offline OscarC

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,420
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 40
I disagree with you. The thread that I see list the services she included on her profile when she started out. It doesn't say "cam" only. :thumbsdown:

Agree, I can’t see any mention of cam only on the verification thread, only the list of services she provided, therefore she is one to avoid in my book.

Offline Kev3773

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,063
  • Likes: 29
  •  
  • Reviews: 90
Have to agree with Jibbi on this one. On Magneticos post on the London verification thread where he shows Jo jos verification picture and listed services, others commented that she was cam only  :unknown:
« Last Edit: November 26, 2018, 08:27:57 pm by alfie2013 »

Offline The Outsider

That whole profile looks to me like it was written by somebody else.  It's in one of those odd AW groups that I don't really see the point of.     Could it be they ticked all the boxes to show up in more searches for cam work then didn't change them when she decided to escort?

Edit... In other words, Jibbi and Alfie may have a point. 
« Last Edit: November 26, 2018, 09:46:30 pm by The Outsider »

Offline bobby79

The one that was promised earlier in the thread by 'Bobby' :hi:

Review is up now...sorry for delay..