Jessyca oliveira - Dundee

[Bignthick85]

External Link/Members Only

Looks=9/10
Body’s=8/10
Service- 6/10
Comms-10/10

I debated for a while with myself whither this was a positive or neutral. Pics are accurate and she looks great. Called her and arranged a time, address sent via text. Location is behind overgate so parking not an issue but you have to pay. Buzzed in 2ndfloor flat. She’s sharing with someone else as I heard them talking briefly but didn’t put me off  answered the door in a dressing gown this always annoys me, no need for it.

Into room money out the way. £70 30mins. Oral is covered which I don’t like but give her due she was good at it.5mins of that then she climbed on top. After 2 mins she wanted to switch, wasn’t a problem then doggy 2 mins she wanted to switch again. This was putting me off, I like to dictate. On to missionary and she just sort of lay there, reports on AW say she is really friendly and bubbly but I never seen that at all. Felt a bit cold. Just very shy I thought.  Anyways I finished and conversation was lacking I couldn’t wait to get out which is unlike me. So although i never felt my money was wasted as she does look great,  just put it as neutral as I wouldn’t return.

[Name Not Found]

answered the door in a dressing gown this always annoys me, no need for it.

I'm intrigued. What do you have against dressing-gowns?

I take it she's a Rom (not Brazilian)? Maybe pimped/trafficked as there's no way she wrote that profile herself?  OW listed but not available?

[Bignthick85]

Haha well the flat wasn’t cold so there was no need for a dressing gown. She still did the hide behind the door routine, I like it when they are ready for action behind the door. Dressing gown seems
Lazy which it was. Just my opinion  she said she was Brazilian, hard to tell really.

[Matrix]

Definitely Brazilian and definitely not an 8 or 9/10 for looks.

[Bignthick85]

Definitely Brazilian and definitely not an 8 or 9/10 for looks.

It’s my opinion. My review.

[Uncle Buck]

It’s my opinion. My review.

+1

100% correct. Your review. Your opinion. Your assessment. Seems that some people struggle to understand the subjectivity of posting reviews.

UB

[DickDiver]

+1

100% correct. Your review. Your opinion. Your assessment. Seems that some people struggle to understand the subjectivity of posting reviews.

UB

And the great thing is that we can use honest reviews to calibrate the reviewer. One man's 8 out of 10 is another man's honking bridge troll. That means we can follow the reviewers who have a similar outlook as we do and disregard the easily pleased

I am all for honestly subjective reviews.

[Matrix]

It’s my opinion. My review.

Yes, and I'm offering mine.

[Matrix]

+1

100% correct. Your review. Your opinion. Your assessment. Seems that some people struggle to understand the subjectivity of posting reviews.

UB

Coming from somebody who appeared to think that the furore over Taz altering a review rating was "schoolyard". 

Also, 33 out of a possible 40? Neutral?

Doesn't make any sense to me but it's his review.

I'll add that from the sound of it, she still gives the same lackluster service.

Good to see you're finally catching up with the site ethos.

[Happyjose]

Coming from somebody who appeared to think that the furore over Taz altering a review rating was "schoolyard". 

Good to see you're finally catching up with the site ethos.

Same guy who gave flippant and clearly misleading advice on a thread about punter security. Doesn't like to admit he's wrong though

You're obviously not one of the seasoned/respected/proper punters he bangs on about. Funny how he became the arbiter of that

not to mention the cutesie way he signs off his posts with his user nic initials, as if that adds some gravitas to his contributions...

[Bignthick85]

Yes, and I'm offering mine.

Yeah, you left that in your own review. No need to cause any bother you’re obviously fishing for a reaction out of people and it worked. Tit

[Matrix]

Same guy who gave flippant and clearly misleading advice on a thread about punter security. Doesn't like to admit he's wrong though

You're obviously not one of the seasoned/respected/proper punters he bangs on about. Funny how he became the arbiter of that

not to mention the cutesie way he signs off his posts with his user nic initials, as if that adds some gravitas to his contributions...

I missed that part. 

I'd have thought somebody of his "gravitas" wouldn't need any extra. Has to be 30 stones at least. 

[Matrix]

Yeah, you left that in your own review. No need to cause any bother you’re obviously fishing for a reaction out of people and it worked. Tit

If you can't deal with others opinions, the internet may be troublesome for you.

Thanks for the review. 

[Bignthick85]

If you can't deal with others opinions, the internet may be troublesome for you.

Thanks for the review. 

You’re welcome. 

[Uncle Buck]

Doesn't make any sense to me but it's his review.

+1

So you’ve finally understood the point I’m making?

UB

[Uncle Buck]

not to mention the cutesie way he signs off his posts with his user nic initials, as if that adds some gravitas to his contributions...

Does that really bother you? “Adds some gravitas” - are you serious?

I’m disappointed with your rant HappyJose but it’s your post and therefore your opinion.

UB

[Matrix]

Does that really bother you? “Adds some gravitas” - are you serious?

I’m disappointed with your rant HappyJose but it’s your post and therefore your opinion.

UB

I'm rather disappointed that you edited out the important part of his post, UB.

Can you understand why?

UB40

[Uncle Buck]

I'm rather disappointed that you edited out the important part of his post, UB.

Can you understand why?

UB40

I do understand Matrix. Does it bother you that much that our views on this occasion differ? I’m sure we’ll get over it and move on. Hopefully very soon.

UB

[Matrix]

I do understand Matrix. Does it bother you that much that our views on this occasion differ? I’m sure we’ll get over it and move on. Hopefully very soon.

UB

Really, on what?

WD40

[Uncle Buck]

Really, on what?

WD40

You’re coming across as a bit of a walloper now Matrix. Let’s put whatever difference of opinion we have a move on.

There’s a good lad.

UB

[S.X. MacHine]

External Link/Members Only

Looks=9/10
Body’s=8/10
Service- 6/10
Comms-10/10

I debated for a while with myself whither this was a positive or neutral. Pics are accurate and she looks great. Called her and arranged a time, address sent via text. Location is behind overgate so parking not an issue but you have to pay. Buzzed in 2ndfloor flat. She’s sharing with someone else as I heard them talking briefly but didn’t put me off  answered the door in a dressing gown this always annoys me, no need for it.

Into room money out the way. £70 30mins. Oral is covered which I don’t like but give her due she was good at it.5mins of that then she climbed on top. After 2 mins she wanted to switch, wasn’t a problem then doggy 2 mins she wanted to switch again. This was putting me off, I like to dictate. On to missionary and she just sort of lay there, reports on AW say she is really friendly and bubbly but I never seen that at all. Felt a bit cold. Just very shy I thought.  Anyways I finished and conversation was lacking I couldn’t wait to get out which is unlike me. So although i never felt my money was wasted as she does look great,  just put it as neutral as I wouldn’t return.

An interesting and informative review, on the basis of which I would avoid her. Why? Like the poster, I like to control the action; this is important to me. I like them submissive.
Secondly, she advertises OWO, but won't perform it, which is basically dishonest. All things being equal, I can put up with OW, but I don't like being lied to.
So, however pretty Jessica may be, and I do think she looks very attractive, I'd agree with the 'neutral' awarded.

[Matrix]

You’re coming across as a bit of a walloper now Matrix. Let’s put whatever difference of opinion we have a move on.

There’s a good lad.

UB

It sounds to me like you're suggesting that we have something in common.

You're free to move on if you wish.

External Link/Members Only

Y2K18

[Uncle Buck]

It sounds to me like you're suggesting that we have something in common.

You're free to move on if you wish.

External Link/Members Only

Y2K18

I’m suggesting nothing of the sort.

UB

[Matrix]

I’m suggesting nothing of the sort.

UB

Let’s put whatever difference of opinion we have a move on.

 

ABN 1-0 HIBS