Ieva, Hatfield £80

[Herts_Outcaller]

Ieva - saw her in Hatfield , but she moves about and is now listed as Farnborough

External Link/Members Only

Comms – very good. Rang her up, asked for a booking, she was available. Then asked her to move it forward half an hour as I left work early, and she happily obliged. The parking instructions were also helpful. 10/10

Girl – Is in fact the girl in the picture, but those photos are definitely old and heavily edited. She is definitely good-looking, but whereas the girl in the photos is a 10, this girl is an 8/10

Other Services – Very nice girl, invited me to have a shower, but insisted this was only if I wanted one. Started off with some very nice kissing, followed by her sinking to her knees, kissing my torso on the way done, for some very nice, non-toothy OWO. She did insist on giving my knob a wipe down with the wet wipes first, understandable even though I’d showered that day. She was a bit of a clean freak and was wiping for a solid 60 seconds, which, if anything, she still managed to make enjoyable by kissing at the same time and almost turning it into a hand-job. 9/10

Sex - On with the sex, she’s great at cowgirl, and doggy. She’s not as good at missionary as she squeezes her legs together to stop you going to hard, which I found annoying as it made it more difficult to come. Has some nice tattoos on her back which is always great for doggy. She also did the annoying thing of repeatedly encouraging me to come early. This was almost enough to turn this into a neutral, and I think her current spread of reviews here (6 positive, 3 neutral, one negative), probably gives you a good idea that she is a mixture of good and bad. I did cum in the end, at which point she said she had cum as well (stop pretending lol) 6/10

Personality – nice girl, speaks good English, tries to make you welcome, had a good chat 7/10

Value for money - £80 for half hour is more than fair enough 9/10

Overall – 7/10 – the average of all the above numbers would be 8. But sex holds more weighting than Comms , and this means I may not go back. I’d still recommend her though.

[WAY-WARD]

I saw her about a month ago and was less than impressed,  she is very pretty though older than her pictures.
She didn't want to kiss, didn't like fingering...just wanted me to cm and go. She did give OWO and took my load in her mouth...I gave her no warning so she couldn't get out of the way so to speak.
I was basically done after 20 minutes into an hours booking...her knickers were back on and she was just short of playing with her phone.
At one point someone entered the flat "that's my husband" she said, I think she was joking but who knows.
As I left she suggested next time I could do 30mins....there won't be a next time I said to myself.

[MrXYZ987]

I saw her about a month ago and was less than impressed,  she is very pretty though older than her pictures.
She didn't want to kiss, didn't like fingering...just wanted me to cm and go. She did give OWO and took my load in her mouth...I gave her no warning so she couldn't get out of the way so to speak.
I was basically done after 20 minutes into an hours booking...her knickers were back on and she was just short of playing with her phone.
At one point someone entered the flat "that's my husband" she said, I think she was joking but who knows.
As I left she suggested next time I could do 30mins....there won't be a next time I said to myself.

Well you've basically done it, so why not put this up as your own review, start that reviews counter under your username?  I'm guessing it would be a negative

[Chorley]

Thanks for the review OP. 
Sounds more like a neutral or negative to me, but of course YMMV. 

[Oldy worldy]

Well you've basically done it, so why not put this up as your own review, start that reviews counter under your username?  I'm guessing it would be a negative

+1

[dynatron]

quite obviously airbrushed improved pics-i wouldant even bother considering a ladies profile with these pics but obviously each to their own