Polish girl- Camila__Hottie - Bethnal Green

[MajorPayne]

Website: External Link/Members Only
Telephone: 07407 048941

First Visit: 12/02/2016 16:00
The call was an Incall

Duration: 1 hour
Fees: £ 80

Recommended: Yes
Would Return: Yes
Description:
Pretty blonde, firm breasts and completely shaved
Comments:
£80 for an hour is good value these days and Camila offers just about everything a gentlemen may desire. Have to stress that Camila's price was all inclusive - there were no extras for anything Camila provided.

The appointment was immediately after work so I had a shower before we started. Did the normal things - kissing, OWO, 69, toys, and then some anal which is a novelty for me. And ended the session with CIM.

With a few minutes to spare Camila tried on a few uniforms for me before I had another shower and left.

I had a really enjoyable time with Camila and would recommend her.

Since first meeting Camila last year I have seen her about six times in total.  Her pictures on AW are accurate but I feel some years old and Camila is plumper now.

I've always had anal with her but it's never lasted more than a few minutes. Don't recall her doing much fk and she does clock watch.  Good value though £80ph no extras.

Her place is a short walk from Bethnal Green railway station, but a reasonable walk from the tube.

[Sinz]

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only

[Sinz]

Her pictures on AW are accurate but I feel some years old and Camila is plumper now.

How is it accurate if you reckon she is some years older and plumper ? 

IMO the pic are heavily photoshopped, agree it's her but probably 15 years ago and definitely does not look anything like the pic, definitely not those tits in the pic.

Lust is blind my friend ..

[averagepunter123]

Have to disagree with you there a bit mate.

I went to see her a few months back and she was nothing like her aw pics. I wouldn't call them accurate as she was far more generously proportioned than her pics suggest, not to mention much older as well to the point where I thought it was a B&S so I just made my excuses and walked!

Maybe her services are good, but her looks when I went to see her were definitely misleading to say the least.

[PLeisure]

I went to see her a few months back and she was nothing like her aw pics. I wouldn't call them accurate as she was far more generously proportioned than her pics suggest, not to mention much older as well to the point where I thought it was a B&S so I just made my excuses and walked!

Maybe her services are good, but her looks when I went to see her were definitely misleading to say the least.

Really would be appreciated if you review when things like this occur. Apart from anything else, it potentially saves another hapless punter from being fleeced 

[holland]

It's a shame that the verification picture of this prossie has been deleted from ukpunting. From memory she doesn't look anything like the pics of her profile.
Here's the link to her old reviews:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=6119

[hugeload]

I popped along last month and took many services for £80.
The pics are how she used to look plus bad photo shopping.  She's has set her price perfectly. I'd return but the hot list has 20+ on it. So she would be a great plan B.

[MajorPayne]

How is it accurate if you reckon she is some years older and plumper ? 

IMO the pic are heavily photoshopped, agree it's her but probably 15 years ago and definitely does not look anything like the pic, definitely not those tits in the pic.

Lust is blind my friend ..

Pictures accurate in that they do depict her and not someone else.  Yes I agree they are professionally done, photo shopped and old.  Though I would say that her photos being 15 years old is an exaggeration.

In her photographs she is maybe a size 8, now probably closer to 10-12.   Given that she has a good length of services and not said no to anything I have asked and is £80ph I consider her to be good value of money.

[PilotMan]

I punted her last year and almost walked. She is a good ten+ years on those pics, I reckon she's a size 12. And I bet she didn't look that good ten years ago, they are photo-shopped enhanced.

Other than that I have nothing negative to say, she provided all her services with enthusiasm, was very chatty and friendly, offered me a shower before and after. Just not facially or physically my type.

[cunningman]

I punted her last year and almost walked. She is a good ten+ years on those pics, I reckon she's a size 12. And I bet she didn't look that good ten years ago, they are photo-shopped enhanced.

Other than that I have nothing negative to say, she provided all her services with enthusiasm, was very chatty and friendly, offered me a shower before and after. Just not facially or physically my type.

Looks like my review is not indexed.  No matter - I agree that the pics are misleading but that's done to death now and should surprise no-one who does research.

[MajorPayne]

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Location: About a 3 minute walk from Stepney Green station.  Clean apartment, didn't hear anyone else.

Communications: Good. Was able to book her over text, quick responses. Initially booked in the morning but circumstances changed and an evening punt was quickly agreed.

Services: OWO, CIM, Anal, Anal play and footjob.  £80 for an hour and anal is £20 extra.

Meet:   Having read her reviews it would appear Camila is like Marmite i.e. those that like her and those that don't- YMMV.  I booked to see her for 60mins, sent her a text on arriving at Stepney Green and she let me in immediately I buzzed the intercom.  Couple of minutes later we sorted out the paper works I undressed and then headed for a shower.  Back to the room and Camila had dressed as I requested; ponytail, choker, quarter cup bra exposing her nipples, lace/see thru panties and 10 denier black holdups.  I have seen Camila a few times over the years and she has a good idea what I enjoy so it was quickly down to OWO and then 69; I really enjoy giving oral.  Camila has a completely shaved pussy which smelt and tasted fresh, in my opinion one of the nicest looking.  Changed positions with me standing at the foot of the bed and Camila in doggy position and more OWO where I face fucked her.  This felt really good but didn't want to cum just yet so changed to me sitting on the bed with Camila opposite and wanking me with her stocking feet.  A good position for to enjoy her bald pussy.  Then she lubed up and on with a condom for me to penetrate her ass, where she felt nice and tight as I squeezed in and out.  Time was getting on and I had to leave soon so we cleaned up and back to me face fucking her (OWO) until I exploded into her mouth with the best orgasm of the year.  Quick shower, dressed and out in 50 minutes as I had another appointment I had to go to.

Return: She does everything I ask so yes definitely plan on meeting her again.  If I was to change anything it would be nice if she swallowed.

 

[Sinz]

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

[Notpastit]

Jury still out on this one - conflicting reports re her resemblance to pics/service levels etc!

Tempted as Polish blonde offering £100 ph incl A in Central London seems a bit of a bargain if she's anything like pics?

Appears from reviews she's not though.

You've seen her quite a bit and recently from your reviews - is she nearer 27 agewise as AW or 40+ as some seem to state?

Looks 30-35 in pic in white lingerie but is she older than this would you say?

[MajorPayne]

Jury still out on this one - conflicting reports re her resemblance to pics/service levels etc!

Tempted as Polish blonde offering £100 ph incl A in Central London seems a bit of a bargain if she's anything like pics?

Appears from reviews she's not though.

You've seen her quite a bit and recently from your reviews - is she nearer 27 agewise as AW or 40+ as some seem to state?

Looks 30-35 in pic in white lingerie but is she older than this would you say?

She is older than 27, I would say she is 30.

I see her again and again as I find her physically attractive, with nice breasts (imho) and completely shaved pussy with small labia. And I get a good service from her. 

Comments have been done to death on her pictures so I'd rather not dredge all that up again.  There are many AW profiles out there which do not give any face pictures - would you avoid them as a result?   That aside her profile is accurate from the perspective of her services (in my experience) as she has done everything I have asked from them.

Very few escorts I have seen over the years have been perfect.  I saw one 18yo in Annabellas who gave me the best orgasm of my life but the next time I saw her it was not a good experience anther time I saw a 19yo who in her profile pictures looked great but when I saw her naked she had the saggiest, flattest breasts I have every seen on a woman under 30.  In all the times I have seen Camila I've not had a bad session; just little things from time to time like anal might be longer and harder and I'd love her to swallow me when I explode in her mouth.  But it is not on her profile so doesn't worry me.

Punting is very much YMMV so I can't guarantee you will have the same experience as me.   A case of you pays your money and takes your choice.  All I can say is I'm happy to see Camila again when money and opportunity come together.

[Sinz]

The WG looks like she is in her early 40s in real life, compared to her pics which make her look like she is in her 20s.

AW pics are heavily photoshopped and the only thing that bares some resemblance in reality is her face. Her tits are not firm as the pics would suggest and her body is not toned as one would infer from the pics.

 

[Sinz]

For future reference OP, you have already reviewed a Positive for this WG within the last year and the site rules states:

Only one positive review thread can be posted for a service provider by one member per 12 month period, the exception is if the new positive review is for a threesome or more booking. This 12-month restriction only applies to positive reviews, not neutral or negative (they can be posted anytime after a positive review). During the 12-month period a member can add their new positive reviews to their existing review thread in the form of a reply.

[lewishamguy]

The WG looks like she is in her early 40s in real life, compared to her pics which make her look like she is in her 20s.

AW pics are heavily photoshopped and the only thing that bares some resemblance in reality is her face. Her tits are not firm as the pics would suggest and her body is not toned as one would infer from the pics.

I guess the pic posted by her rival pimp/boyfriend was indeed her? Is that how she looks in real life?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=175475

[holland]

I guess the pic posted by her rival pimp/boyfriend was indeed her? Is that how she looks in real life?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=175475

Thanks lewishamguy.
It is one of the worst fake photoshop profile i ever seen

[holland]

Hidden Image/Members Only


Hidden Image/Members Only

[Notpastit]

OK, if that's a truer representation that would explain the £100 incl rate appearing to be a bit of a bargain

Can any recent visitor confirm that's the case, ie CH is 40+ as pic?

As said, have been tempted to investigate but don't want to waste time/journey if a no no!

Cheers

[The_Don]

I wonder how many punters have walked, due to what's on the profile, vs the reality.

[MajorPayne]

For future reference OP, you have already reviewed a Positive for this WG within the last year and the site rules states:

Only one positive review thread can be posted for a service provider by one member per 12 month period, the exception is if the new positive review is for a threesome or more booking. This 12-month restriction only applies to positive reviews, not neutral or negative (they can be posted anytime after a positive review). During the 12-month period a member can add their new positive reviews to their existing review thread in the form of a reply.

Apologies

[pepsicolaboy]

Hidden Image/Members Only


Hidden Image/Members Only

WTF 

[Naughtyboyuk]

Will write a full review when I get the time/chance but wanted to say that I saw Camila recently and whilst not as attractive as her profile pictures she is quite attractive and definitely offers great VFM

£80 for two lengthy periods of OWO, RO, covered sex in doggy and finishing both times in her mouth...a bargain especially as some lunchtime exercise !!

Having now met her the £20 extra to fuck her ass is definitely on the cards for next time

[BootsnBunches]

Looks ten years older and is about 3 stone heavier from my experience.

[mrx007]

OMG she's not unattractive from that photo but the shock value would lose my boner. So though I have often wondered about her I will wonder no more.

Thanks for the post.

[cunningman]

OMG she's not unattractive from that photo but the shock value would lose my boner. So though I have often wondered about her I will wonder no more.

I really don't understand your position.  She seems to be a bit marmite - but a lot of it is having unrepresentative pictures.  I don't know why she does it - she's a bit 'girl next door' but not unattractive and my recollection was that her bod was fine and she knows how to use it.  No delay in getting naked, or 'don't do that' BS.  That the pictures are not representative should not surprise anyone now. The blurry yellow dress one is representative.  I'd put her at mid to late 30s, probably not 40.

If she was a barmaid, you'd flirt with her and be pretty happy if you pulled.

Just don't expect acting pretending she's your horny girlfriend - its businesslike.  But I was Ok with that, and she can talk about the business and life crap and hold a conversation and I think she responds to it.  Its been a while - I reviewed once but went several times and repeats were better - more banter.

Forget the pictures, and think about 80 quid for the hour.  Be straight about what you want and take a sense of humour with you.

[Naughtyboyuk]

Just don't expect acting pretending she's your horny girlfriend - its businesslike.  But I was Ok with that, and she can talk about the business and life crap and hold a conversation and I think she responds to it. 

Forget the pictures, and think about 80 quid for the hour.  Be straight about what you want and take a sense of humour with you.

I agree for £80 I wasn’t expecting the hottest looking girl in the world but she did perform....and from speaking to her she seems happy to entertain more kinky stuff with regulars.  And £100 to include anal seems a bargain

[BootsnBunches]

I agree for £80 I wasn’t expecting the hottest looking girl in the world but she did perform....and from speaking to her she seems happy to entertain more kinky stuff with regulars.  And £100 to include anal seems a bargain

It's entirely about the lies on age and pictures.

[Big Bad R]

Hidden Image/Members Only


Hidden Image/Members Only

Wow looks like mother and her daughter 

[BootsnBunches]

Wow looks like mother and her daughter 

Exactly.