MissKDD - Central London

[Belgarion]

Oh ffs 

Belgarion leave it bruv it's not worth it

There's no saving some people.

[Cuntminion]

There is in punting a common supposition that everyone barebacks.  Clients with their wives/girlfriends/sometimes SP’s . SP’s with their husbands/boyfriends/sometimes or all clients.  Trying to beat up a SP because she saw a client who may have barebacked a barebacker is nuts.  When we punt, the majority of us wear protection to protect ourselves and lower risks because we assume this (barebacking).  Many only receive OW to further lower their risks.  You take your chances, just as the SP does. So if you decide that a service provider partakes in CIM which increases her risk profile for OWO then it’s up to you to make the decision to see the girl or not too or to partake in OW or OWO.  Only you know your tolerance to risk.  Believing what is written on an AW profile..... I think only those that are punting virgins do, most of UKP takes it with a pinch of salt.

I don't find "everybody barebacks someone" valid mitigation firstly as no, not everyone does

Secondly risk management, if someone books you on aw doesn't take two minutes to check prior feedback
So for an sp that is lousy and irresponsible

Yes punting has risk that has to be expected but i don't understand why anyone wouldn't take all information available to make it safer for themselves

You cannot do nothing about what you don't know but if you have knowledge to hand and ignore it that just seems to me indicative of overall attitude

Since i started punting I've always cross referenced and it absoulutely does factor into my booking decisions

[Belgarion]

There is in punting a common supposition that everyone barebacks.  Clients with their wives/girlfriends/sometimes SP’s . SP’s with their husbands/boyfriends/sometimes or all clients.  Trying to beat up a SP because she saw a client who may have barebacked a barebacker is nuts.  When we punt, the majority of us wear protection to protect ourselves and lower risks because we assume this (barebacking).  Many only receive OW to further lower their risks.  You take your chances, just as the SP does. So if you decide that a service provider partakes in CIM which increases her risk profile for OWO then it’s up to you to make the decision to see the girl or not too or to partake in OW or OWO.  Only you know your tolerance to risk.  Believing what is written on an AW profile..... I think only those that are punting virgins do, most of UKP takes it with a pinch of salt.

Considering she is championing safe sex and asking for proof of testing (sometimes), it is a bit silly of her not to do a basic review of a profile.

[Stav096]

There is in punting a common supposition that everyone barebacks.  Clients with their wives/girlfriends/sometimes SP’s . SP’s with their husbands/boyfriends/sometimes or all clients.  Trying to beat up a SP because she saw a client who may have barebacked a barebacker is nuts.  When we punt, the majority of us wear protection to protect ourselves and lower risks because we assume this (barebacking).  Many only receive OW to further lower their risks.  You take your chances, just as the SP does. So if you decide that a service provider partakes in CIM which increases her risk profile for OWO then it’s up to you to make the decision to see the girl or not too or to partake in OW or OWO.  Only you know your tolerance to risk.  Believing what is written on an AW profile..... I think only those that are punting virgins do, most of UKP takes it with a pinch of salt.

Thank you, I am aware of those considerations, however I suggest that there are many that will not have been aware of the higher level of risk activity that the individual is apart of - something which I think has been clearly made evident.

Your standpoint could be interpreted as an attempt to deflect attention from the previously unknown level of risk.