busty 32gg - neutral/disappointing

[agcnospam]

Hi all

Met this girl just before Christmas, she has had other profiles on AW previously under the name of Lacey and also maybe Chloe 32GG? Mixed feedback and forum comments so I thought I'd try her anyway;

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Comms by sms, no issues, serviced apartment in South Kensington. Paid £120 for an hour, all services were on offer as listed.

She text me the flat number just before 7pm (agreed time), and up I went. Fairly busy block and no issues with reception/concierge. Up I went and into the room with no problem.

I had scanned the profile quite a bit but I was a bit disappointed with this girl. She talks a hell of a lot, whilst not avoiding action, it was a bit like she was on speed. Also she seemed a bit older than I expected, and her boobs are not that well done (I did know they were fakes beforehand). Also she has scarring on her bottom, which she told me she got from sitting on a set of hair tongs. She was also fairly tall for someone with her heritage.

Usual stuff, OWO, mish, doggy, and she was up for a bit of backdoor action but I didn't feel like it, think it was CIM but I honestly can't remember now. She is the girl from the pics but she just looked a bit older than I had hoped she would, although I would add she was perfectly pleasant to talk to and quite accommodating generally.

So I have graded this as a neutral review, due to the fact that I had perhaps built her up in my own mind to be more attractive than she is in person. I would not visit again, but maybe she is more to the taste of other punters.

When I left there was another girl in the flat walking about, a fairly slim black girl, which did not bother me but may put off others.

Overall not the worst but not worth a revisit.

[Daffodil]

Thanks for the review. She looks like she has a fit body, but shame to hear her boob job is poorly done.

She reckons that she is 28, not accurate then?

Otherwise sounds reasonable and I guess a neutral is about right. Nice to find somebody who offers an all-inclusive service, it seems harder to find these days.

[agcnospam]

Yeah I would place her as around 35, by no means ugly but she just seemed older than I expected her to look (even taking the stated age as 28 with a pinch of salt as I have found that many girls with thai roots age very well).