Author Topic: Sexy Katte (Now zzz.evy) Romanian in Maidstone  (Read 1047 times)


25 review(s) for Abby White (6 positive, 13 neutral, 6 negative) [Indexed by ]
48 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 7645060) (8 positive, 20 neutral, 20 negative) [Indexed by scutty brown]

Offline CockMonster

External Link/Members Only


TLDR:  Mechanical service and likes not accurate (so no surprises there), but sooooo hot and without the usual negative attitude, I think I would return again despite the caveats below...

Price(s): £80 for 30 minutes (I now see it is £70 for 30 minutes) with OWO included 'at discretion' which surprise, surprise, she did not do when I arrived.

Logistics: A few texts back and forth confirming location and services and address and time confirmed.

Location: Flats in Maidstone which I've seen other girls at and not all were Romanian, so I'm not sure what the deal is. I really don't think it's a pimp rolling girls in and out due to the very different nature of the girls I've seen advertised there, I'm guessing a flat bookable by the week that's come on the the circuit.  Relatively discrete outside, cameras inside (which I hate) and top floor so plenty of possibility of running into neighbours depending upon the time you go.

Looks: Smoking. Hot.  This would be borderline negative apart from the fact, she really is amazingly hot.  Fake tits which I normally dont like, but everything else was supermodel-esque and that alone was worth the money to me.

Service: Whilst I wouldn't say it was the usual 'mechanical' Romanian style, she was certainly disinterested.  OWO and the clothing request were clearly news to her when I arrived - and were not possible. But I must say she does fuck really good, several times in cowgirl I had to stop her, and then the site of her sexy arse in doggy meant I had to stop a few times in case I finished way too early. She was definitely very sensual, and knew how to work my body - "so why the 'disinterested' mentioned above CoMo?" - well you could tell she just wasnt into it at all.  I don't expect all these WGs to be super into what they do, or even great actresses, but she clearly wasn't enjoying herself and wasn't hiding it.

Conclusion: I really struggled on whether this should be negative or neutral.  Clearly Negative because of incorrect likes on her AW account, and the 'disinterested' note mentioned above.  But honestly, the fact she was soooo hot and good at what she did has to count for something, and drags this back to a neutral.  Indeed, the fact that I would return means it wouldn't be right to put a negative - so neutral is fair.  If you read this and understand all the above, and still go, you won't be disappointed.

PS: This took place a few months ago - I am currently uploading a lot of reviews from previous encounters as I'm new to the site!

Offline Kentman27

Sounds hot shame she doesnt do owo

Offline t0mm13

Have this girl on my List was def top 3 but been holding off a bit due to lack of self worth [and low funds]. May have to put on hold since your review.

thanks for heads up.

So did she allow any kissing?
Did she not put any sexy gear on at all?

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Sounds hot shame she doesnt do owo

and no dfk :dash: :dash: :dash: :dash: :dash:
 should be £100 per hour tops..
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline massageseeker1977

Thanks for the review and the platonic service is generally why I avoid Romanians

She has already moved on to London too

Offline CockMonster

Have this girl on my List was def top 3 but been holding off a bit due to lack of self worth [and low funds]. May have to put on hold since your review.

thanks for heads up.

So did she allow any kissing?
Did she not put any sexy gear on at all?

No kissing whatsoever - always disappointing when it's advertised and confirmed via text...  However with kissing I am not too fussed, had it been a major priority this def would have been a negative review.