MsLadyV - border line Neutral - Leicester

[Arbetare]

MsLadyV - Leicester

External Link/Members Only & External Link/Members Only

One hour GFE £120 + £20 for OWO

After considerable thought, I've rated this as Positive, but only just. It could possibly be another man's Neutral.

Booking arranged via AW. Victoria requests that you ring her to confirm requirements and this lead to the booking being confirmed. She gave suggestions for parking local to her. Comms were some of the best I've had, very clear and precise. Her profile should give you an idea of how organised/professional she is.

Parked up at the John Lewis carpark and walked to a place local to her apartment. I rang Victoria and she gave me verbal directions on how to get to her's. Although close to the shopping center, in no way did I feel conspicuous.

The door opened as I got to the door, and as it closed, I was greeted by Victoria. No kiss or hug offered was offered, which I found unusual. I'll admit that although not unattractive, she isn't my type facially. She was dressed as requested and has a superb body, which she works hard to maintain. Her apartment is clean and modern, definitely one of the better ones I've visited.

A little chit-chat, handed over the cash and I'm offered a drink before I head for the shower. Back out to find Victoria in her bedroom, where she suggests I lie down for a massage. This had been mentioned during comms and I was happy to go along with this as I like a massage sometimes - who doesn't like a young woman touching them up? First on my back whilst chatting and then asked to turn over. A bit of touching and then Victoria takes her bra off to reveal her boobs. They obviously been done, but look pretty good. Very quickly we are kissing and caressing, and things start to warm up. She's a good kisser, not DFK, but gentle FK. This lead to OWO on me, which was good, with attention to my shaft and balls. 69 was then suggested so indulged in that for a while. She made all the right noises, but did seem a little-contrived tbh, and when we moved to RO, there was a little too much 'ooh baby' type comments for me 

The RO was having it's effect on me, so I asked for the rubber and went straight into Mish, followed by CG and then doggy where I finished. Victoria was responsive during all this, including pushing back during doggy like a good girl should, but still with a little too much theatrics for me.

After a bit of a cuddle and a bit more chat, I showered, had a last hug from Victoria and was out the door. In and out on the hour.

Would I return? No. The main reason for this being a borderline Positive/Neutral for me was that Victoria was just a bit too reserved during the entire meet, almost like there was a 'veil' between her and what was happening. Other reviews have mentioned a lack of a 'spark' to her, which I agree with. Couple that the suspicion that she was following a script for what we did, then it was close to a Neutral for me. I've given a Positive as she provided all agreed services well and to be honest, she came over as a nice young woman, all said and done. I think that if she was a little more warmer and welcoming she would be a knockout if she's your type.

[MajorPayne]

you are right it does seem more a neutral.

[RogerBoner]

She looks good in her UKE media pics. Other reviewers mentioned a lot of DFK action. It seems like a positive experience overall. Her breasts have divided opinions and apparently the scars are unpleasant. I don't know about you but they look great to me :


Hidden Image/Members Only

[alpharius]

She looks good in her UKE media pics. Other reviewers mentioned a lot of DFK action. It seems like a positive experience overall. Her breasts have divided opinions and apparently the scars are unpleasant. I don't know about you but they look great to me :


Hidden Image/Members Only

She builds into kissing, and I suspect is based on chemistry/comfort too how far she goes. I got great DFK with her quickly

Visually from the front they are excellent, in a dress you can't tell. Naked, they are obviously fake, very perky and defined on her lean body with really well defined areolas/bullet nipples. The scars are fairly bad, it sounds like her first boob job was a bodge job but you can overlook them quite easy as the front visual is so good

[jayuk99]

From looking at her pics she seems to look like emma watson the actress.

[Arbetare]

I think that I can boil my decision on Positive/Neutral down to Victoria not coming over as uninterested (that would have been a Neutral if she had) but a bit distant whilst trying to provide agreed services.

It could be that she picked up on me not fancying her, although I was my normal cheerful self in the booking 
Thing is, £140 for someone who needs to 'warm-up' and possibly not fully is a bit odd. I've seen others who charge less but are convincing in being very pleased to see you and fully engaged from the get-go.

Kissing, well it was good with gentle tongues but not an out-right snogfest like I've enjoyed with others. As for her breasts, they are pneumatic but were no problem for me. I didn't notice the scars, tbh.

[mrfishyfoo]

I think that I can boil my decision on Positive/Neutral down to Victoria not coming over as uninterested (that would have been a Neutral if she had) but a bit distant whilst trying to provide agreed services.

It could be that she picked up on me not fancying her, although I was my normal cheerful self in the booking 
Thing is, £140 for someone who needs to 'warm-up' and possibly not fully is a bit odd. I've seen others who charge less but are convincing in being very pleased to see you and fully engaged from the get-go.

Kissing, well it was good with gentle tongues but not an out-right snogfest like I've enjoyed with others. As for her breasts, they are pneumatic but were no problem for me. I didn't notice the scars, tbh.

I've looked at this one several times and had OK comms. Reason I haven't seen her is because she came across to me as one of those lasses that "can't do it if she ain't into it" which is a shame. IMHO she's into "top of the range territory" at £2+ per minute so she's not being paid to get warmed up, she should be out of the blocks like a greyhound that's caught the scent.

Better "luck" next time fella. 

[Arbetare]

I've looked at this one several times and had OK comms. Reason I haven't seen her is because she came across to me as one of those lasses that "can't do it if she ain't into it" which is a shame. IMHO she's into "top of the range territory" at £2+ per minute so she's not being paid to get warmed up, she should be out of the blocks like a greyhound that's caught the scent.

Better "luck" next time fella. 

Yep, spot on - she's near the top of my range as well and as you say, for the money she should be raring to go.

And thanks, onwards and upwards 

[Bangers and Gash]

So, Lady V delivers an authentic GFE. ie, boring and lacklustre. Throw in 140 sheets for the privilege and I'd give it a negative all day long. 

[vw]

So, Lady V delivers an authentic GFE. ie, boring and lacklustre. Throw in 140 sheets for the privilege and I'd give it a negative all day long. 

Indeed, maybe OP didn't want to upset the 2 that usually dribble all over her reviews. 

Have they stopped the comment first competition now it has been spotted? 

[Picti]

Indeed, maybe OP didn't want to upset the 2 that usually dribble all over her reviews. 

Have they stopped the comment first competition now it has been spotted? 

Talking of dribbling, you've got yourself unnecessarily excited 

The inconvenient truth for you is that if you compare my review with the OP's they are about 90% similar. He obviously has slightly different tastes to me, but that's normal. I also found the initial reserve and clearly said so in my review, but I found that she warmed up nicely. There was no reserve in subsequent bookings. I can't comment on the description of fake porno noises as I haven't experienced that.

Furthermore, the OP has been clear on his reasoning for the rating and it didn't mention anyone else. However, if you think there's been any undue influence or untoward posts, then get your hypertrophic report finger into action. Or is it just your usual provocative bullshit that has nothing to do with the forum, and everything to do with making you seem important  .

[HailWood]

Have they stopped the comment first competition now it has been spotted? 

I love the fact that VW actually trawled through Victoria’s reviews to see who responded first. Wonder how many of the reviews VW has been the first to comment?

[Weyoun]

Thanks for the review Arbetare. My recent experience with Victoria was very similar and like you, she wasn't my type facially and I too struggled whether my review should be neutral or positive with it being a positive just.

I got the impression that she's quite a reserved person possibly socially awkward, which isn't a criticism just an observation. From my perspective, it was okay experience but I wouldn't return.

[Arbetare]

@Bangers and Gash - Nah, I know what boring and lacklustre feels like, hence me punting  I'm rubbish with words so perhaps the nuances of what I trying to get across are missing. Mr Fishyfoo and Weyoun have got the same kind of impression that I got it seems.

@VT - I'm unconcerned about upsetting other punters with my reviews, or any of the girls I review; I just review to pass on my own experience of a girl and help others to make an informed choice.

@Weyoun - Yep, as I walked out I thought of your review, it's pretty much the same experience. Pictiusnum mentions her being better on a repeat visit, but I'll not be going back to anyone unless the first session was a solid good punt.

[vw]

I love the fact that VW actually trawled through Victoria’s reviews to see who responded first. Wonder how many of the reviews VW has been the first to comment?

My observations seem to have triggered you both though, must be close to the mark.  Was no effort what so ever checking 11 reviews at the time, all motivated  by watching the territorial pissing by you two.

[HailWood]

My observations seem to have triggered you both though, must be close to the mark.  Was no effort what so ever checking 11 reviews at the time, all motivated  by watching the territorial pissing by you two.

C’mon then - do a recount and make it a three way competition. Bet you have commented before either Picti or me at least three or four times. Territorial pissing....   it’s punting and there ain’t any territories. 

[vw]

C’mon then - do a recount and make it a three way competition. Bet you have commented before either Picti or me at least three or four times. Territorial pissing....   it’s punting and there ain’t any territories. 

I'm not part of the 2 dribbling platitudes in what seems a competition.   Shocks me you need others to count for you.     

[HailWood]

I'm not part of the 2 dribbling platitudes in what seems a competition.   Shocks me you need others to count for you.     

Just for shits n giggles....

13 reviews and the score for first to comment after the review is:

Picti: 5
VW: 4
MTB: 2

You beat me VW 

 

[vw]

Just for shits n giggles....

13 reviews and the score for first to comment after the review is:

Picti: 5
VW: 4
MTB: 2

You beat me VW 

 

Well considering we are on about platitude posts, I would recount.

You and slapanyone seem to have held back since it was first observed.   

[Marky789]

I have read your comments with interest and thank you.

I have had the (mis) pleasure of being entertained chez MsLadyV

In my view, an inexperienced lady, in many ways, operating her business in almost administrative, functional capacity much akin to that which you may expect from, maybe, a bank clerk.
Unimpressively attractive, she exudes the girl next door impression that you never wanted to encounter even though your parents were friendly with her parents.

Going with the flow, living in the moment and going for it....are simply not expressions that form part of this lady’s vocabulary. However, in fairness, she is well spoken, courteous and delivers an awkward but welcoming  kind of customer service.

She delivers OWO for £20 extra but CiIM is definitely off the menu......a fact of which she reminded me as I came in 69 position. Perhaps not the most sexually stimulating comments ...given the circumstances.

If you like vanilla, with fat free cream, no sugar, no flake, no wafer but a spoon if you pay extra....this girl is for you.



Since writing this review earlier in the year, I have often reflected if my comments were harsh, entirely subjective or fair.

I have read carefully, both the written word and the unwritten inference that has emanated from many credible participants on this board. I fully understand the nuances and considerations that, perhaps, one needs to adopt in reaching a balanced view.However, notwithstanding the beautifully crafted reviews of the personification of perfect service delivery, I find myself agreeing with this most recent review. Essentially, nothing was particularly wrong with the service.....but then again nothing was particularly great. If, at the time of your visit, you maintained a full complement of spermicidal fluid about your person, you might well have been grateful for its timely and competent release and therefore reviewed as Positive. Alternatively, if your expectation was for this process to be executed in a manner not reminiscent of collecting your spectacle prescription from the local opticians.....then perhaps you reviewed as Neutral or Negative.

Whilst beauty remains in the eye of the beholder, I remain perplexed that so many regard this lady’s personality, appearance and service or any combination thereof as so attractive.

As they say.....’ this is a No for me ‘

[vw]

Since writing this review earlier in the year, I have often reflected if my comments were harsh, entirely subjective or fair.

what review?   

[Marky789]

Review as per above........9 December 2017......so not strictly earlier this year....

I thought that its reproduction would save other possible contributors the inconvenience of retrieval for reference.

I seek your forgiveness for not highlighting the information as an attachment.

I am grateful for your guidance.

[vw]

Review as per above........9 December 2017......so not strictly earlier this year....

I thought that its reproduction would save other possible contributors the inconvenience of retrieval for reference.

I seek your forgiveness for not highlighting the information as an attachment.

I am grateful for your guidance.

but you have not reviewed her here at all.  Was that on another site?

[RogerBoner]

I have read your comments with interest and thank you.

I have had the (mis) pleasure of being entertained chez MsLadyV

In my view, an inexperienced lady, in many ways, operating her business in almost administrative, functional capacity much akin to that which you may expect from, maybe, a bank clerk.
Unimpressively attractive, she exudes the girl next door impression that you never wanted to encounter even though your parents were friendly with her parents.

Going with the flow, living in the moment and going for it....are simply not expressions that form part of this lady’s vocabulary. However, in fairness, she is well spoken, courteous and delivers an awkward but welcoming  kind of customer service.

She delivers OWO for £20 extra but CiIM is definitely off the menu......a fact of which she reminded me as I came in 69 position. Perhaps not the most sexually stimulating comments ...given the circumstances.

If you like vanilla, with fat free cream, no sugar, no flake, no wafer but a spoon if you pay extra....this girl is for you.

I'm now convinced not to visit.

[Weyoun]

but you have not reviewed her here at all.  Was that on another site?

He wrote it here but not as a standalone review of his own. Marky wrote that on rajpat12's review of this WG. In hindsight should probably have turned it a review proper but it is there.

[vw]

He wrote it here but not as a standalone review of his own. Marky wrote that on rajpat12's review of this WG. In hindsight should probably have turned it a review proper but it is there.

Makes sense, maybe he should post as a stand alone.   

[Picti]

He wrote it here but not as a standalone review of his own. Marky wrote that on rajpat12's review of this WG. In hindsight should probably have turned it a review proper but it is there.

Of course he should, and I think he still can. As I've said previously (and as VW conveniently neglects to mention) the more breadth and diversity of reviews the better.

I've had only positive experiences (and I'm far from vanilla), but there's now a developing variety of opinions on her. That can only be beneficial in guiding any punter's decision-making.