Author Topic: MARIE ANN BABY DOLL - Harrow Weald - Not suited to this.  (Read 4358 times)


7 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5278034) (4 positive, 0 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]
8 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5663630) (4 positive, 0 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline PatMacGroin

My reading of this is that the girl is probably trafficked, obviously unhappy. And probably got a kicking from the pimp for not performing.
You are all looking at the wrong problem. This sounds like a girl who needs help, not complaints to the pimp.
Call the police

You do seem very quick to jump to the conclusion that a WG is being trafficked.

I've not visited this establishment myself, but it's clear from previous posts here on UKP that it has been operating from the same location for years, not some fly by night set-up like most trafficking gangs. It even seems like the closest thing you get to a "family run business" in this game, with the management being passed on from long term WG to long term WG. I'd be very surprised if it's not well known to the police already.

Offline PatMacGroin

The impression that this thread has given me is that this place clearly has a few regulars that they appreciate. And so the management probably encourage the girls to make a particular effort to look after them.

It makes good business sense if it encourages frequent punters to revisit the establishment as often as possible. If they have worked out that punter is also a respected UKP member, they'll realise the good reviews are also good for business.

This doesn't mean those members are touts for that location. The reviews they have submitted are most likely honest accounts of the service they received. But it may mean that they are more likely to receive a good service from an inconsistent WG, compared to a first time visitor to that location.

Good for them, but it does mean that sometimes their reviews will have to be read with a little caution, and the understanding that YMMV. The same could possibly be said for any prolific punter that prefers a particular parlour or agency.
« Last Edit: February 28, 2020, 01:41:35 pm by PatMacGroin »

Offline GreyDave

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,318
  • Likes: 81
  •  
  • Reviews: 111
There is no indication at all of trafficking or coercion at this place. The girls work 2 weeks on and go home for the other 2 weeks. Most of them have been there for a couple of years or more

+1   :hi: :hi:

 I have been visting over years like Steve2 and have never felt the Girls there to be coerced in any way they seem to be the Hoilday work types and ok a few have been iffy but they are the ones who took the piss not out of just punters but the reputation of Niki who runs the place when there is a wg that is to my taste looks wise I see several times (hopefully) some have been really great VFM shags But you get what you put out .I am a out of shape almost 60 pot belly little dicked with vanilla tastes white bloke, The BBC hung Stud marathon Fuckmachine may well feel diffrent ...These are mostly girl nextdoor types and yummy mummies tring to make a few quid FFS lads chill.
« Last Edit: February 28, 2020, 03:28:06 pm by GreyDave »

Offline HERTSBLUE

Exactly well said it a well run place.

Offline HERTSBLUE


Offline Diggler fights back!

The impression that this thread has given me is that this place clearly has a few regulars that they appreciate. And so the management probably encourage the girls to make a particular effort to look after them.

It makes good business sense if it encourages frequent punters to revisit the establishment as often as possible. If they have worked out that punter is also a respected UKP member, they'll realise the good reviews are also good for business.

This doesn't mean those members are touts for that location. The reviews they have submitted are most likely honest accounts of the service they received. But it may mean that they are more likely to receive a good service from an inconsistent WG, compared to a first time visitor to that location.

Good for them, but it does mean that sometimes their reviews will have to be read with a little caution, and the understanding that YMMV. The same could possibly be said for any prolific punter that prefers a particular parlour or agency.

I totally agree with your opinion, but I’m a firm believer that a UKP member shouldn’t really be known to a knocking shop. I also believe every punter who walks through the door and doesn’t behave like a dickhead should be treated equally. It appears to me this girl is now performing at a better level after this whole thing played out, but that’s no consolation to me, Ron and the others she gave a crappy service to. Or possibly I’ve got it wrong and I should consider becoming besties with a Madame so I can be thrown a few bones too.