Diva agency

[Fututor]

First a mea culpa

After a couple of years off punting I decided to have a punt in November which I didn’t review. I’m sorry. The girl is no longer active and I can’t even remember her name. I followed that up last week with a punt with a girl called Tory from Diva who is still active and for whom I will submit a review in due course (but see below).

The reason for this post though was prompted by seeing someone post elsewhere about a seeming uptick in the number of reviews for Diva.

As part of the confirmation of my booking in November I received a text which indicated that if I posted a review on either C69 or Pnet then I could expect a £50 discount on a subsequent booking. I tried this on with my Tory booking and, indeed, the girl applied a £50 discount which she told me came out of the agency’s cut.

So the purpose of this post is just as a heads up: you should apply a degree of caution to any Diva reviews as they seem to routinely offer a kicker for reviews. UKP wasn’t mentioned on their text but who knows. This may be the reason that reviews are appearing.

[hw189]

The reason why Diva don't mention UKP is because fake reviews here frequently get challenged / removed / or members banned as a result. Something that does not happen at all on P Net or C69 sites. Those sites are nowadays just used for advertising and touting platforms for escorts and agencies alike. No one hardly uses them nowadays (not genuine punters anyway). Diva escorts, just like Hot Collection and other agencies, know full well about UKP and track this site frequently especially for any positive reviews on their girls. They have no problem even linking to this site when positive reviews get posted here, one example in case: External Link/Members Only. Of course, any negative or neutral reviews are conveniently never linked or dismissed.

Just did a search on P Net for all reviews in the last 10 days in London, and it yields a result of 34 total reviews where 8 of those reviews are for escorts from Diva escort agency. I can tell straight away, and without reading those reviews, that they are BS and fake where some are probably written just to obtain that £50 discount from Diva.

[nym2018]

First a mea culpa

After a couple of years off punting I decided to have a punt in November which I didn’t review. I’m sorry. The girl is no longer active and I can’t even remember her name. I followed that up last week with a punt with a girl called Tory from Diva who is still active and for whom I will submit a review in due course (but see below).

The reason for this post though was prompted by seeing someone post elsewhere about a seeming uptick in the number of reviews for Diva.

As part of the confirmation of my booking in November I received a text which indicated that if I posted a review on either C69 or auto-censored then I could expect a £50 discount on a subsequent booking. I tried this on with my Tory booking and, indeed, the girl applied a £50 discount which she told me came out of the agency’s cut.

So the purpose of this post is just as a heads up: you should apply a degree of caution to any Diva reviews as they seem to routinely offer a kicker for reviews. UKP wasn’t mentioned on their text but who knows. This may be the reason that reviews are appearing.

didnt see that you ended up reviewing Tory. would you recommend?

[magnetico]

Diva is still giving discounts to positive reviewers on UKP?

I'm suspicious of all these recent reviews of Diva girls that popped up the last 2 weeks.

[Joepeeps]

Some hard earned cash being saved. Should the reviewer declare when they have received discounts? Doesn't look like they do currently.

[FlyingBreadMan]

Diva is still giving discounts to positive reviewers on UKP?

I'm suspicious of all these recent reviews of Diva girls that popped up the last 2 weeks.

While you and I won't fall for the touting, new joiners will.

What to do? Maybe BUYER BEWARE is all one can say...

[FlyingBreadMan]

Some hard earned cash being saved. Should the reviewer declare when they have received discounts? Doesn't look like they do currently.

That would probably lead to a banning as ukp community does not support touts.

King-Tarded from Hounslow previously going for bargain basement Roms now waltzing up and down Kensington...On his meager budget?

I hardly think so.

[daddycool]

The spate of recent reviews always seemed suspect to me. Guess my suspicions weren't unfounded.

[Mr Farkyhars]

That would probably lead to a banning as ukp community does not support touts

I don't think so. When the rules say

"- Touting
No touting or advertising. You must disclose any link you have that may be seen as bias, even if you're just a past customer. Sharing info must be for the benefit of other punters and not to promote the business of others."

there's no warning that such disclosure will lead to a ban.

[LLPunting]

Given the recent controversy around discounts for reviews (offered by other agencies too), but particularly about Diva as they seem to be getting a disproportionate amount of coverage here despite the girls they offer being available at the same nominal rate at several other agencies (whether they are actually a cartel or not who knows?), I wanted to ask:

1) Is the discount offered on the girl you're about to see or is it a promise of a discount on a future booking after you've reviewed?

2) Has the agency ever indicated that the review must be favourable or NOT negative in order to qualify for discount?

3) If they discount future visits then has anyone who posted a negative review for a Diva (or other agency) girl subsequently not been given a discount?

4) If they discount the booking you're about to make if you promise to review then did the girl appear to know about the expected review or even ask for a review in return for special treatment (not more discount)?  Did you suspect the girl may have been over-performing with the review in mind?   (yeah I know it seems highly unlikely but have to ask for completeness.)

I'm presuming only those not currently benefiting from these discounting agencies will likely pipe up BUT it would be very reassuring if an active Diva user would spill (oh for another unicorn).

Silence will of course be very telling as a shed load plead the 5th.

[Waterhouse]

BUT it would be very reassuring if an active Diva user would spill (oh for another unicorn).

... And give a clear and unambiguous answer. 

[vw]

... And give a clear and unambiguous answer. 

Unlike king shady.   

[Waterhouse]

Unlike king shady.   

Precisely...!

[LLPunting]

Gents, KT has made his public denial so let him stand by it and the colour of his reviews will now speak for him.
There are others that have yet to speak up and it would be great if they could clarify with much less controversial authority.
Better yet Diva and other agencies come forth and categorically state that they will discount regardless of review conclusion.

[vw]

Gents, KT has made his public denial so let him stand by it and the colour of his reviews will now speak for him.
There are others that have yet to speak up and it would be great if they could clarify with much less controversial authority.
Better yet Diva and other agencies come forth and categorically state that they will discount regardless of review conclusion.

His shady non review posts show him standing by it. IMO well shady and also  making up FBM got banned for anythingn other than misuse  of moderation options.   

[smiths]

Pimps will do anything that they think will attract punters to them, we are talking scum who make a buck leeching off WGs.

Some punters as VT now banned proved do deals with pimps, they aren't going to admit what the deal is, or at least its unlikely they are going to in my view. I know nothing of this pimp as I don't punt through them or any other agency which would mean I would have to pay more to pay for the pimps cut.

Its well worth some pimps time/money/free punts whatever the deal is to get punters on here on their books and particularly established punters, who knows how widespread bribing is, I suspect far more widespread than has been proven.

[Waterhouse]

Gents, KT has made his public denial so let him stand by it and the colour of his reviews will now speak for him.
There are others that have yet to speak up and it would be great if they could clarify with much less controversial authority.
Better yet Diva and other agencies come forth and categorically state that they will discount regardless of review conclusion.

His 'under duress'  negative reviews
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=210758.0 
and 
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=207798.0  do leave a lot to be desired though.  His positve reviews seem to have a lot more info in them.

If a lurker/newb/one-post-wonder had submitted something like these, which sorely lack content, they'd most likely be pulled up for it.