Author Topic: Pornstar ruby - Nr Holborn - ok  (Read 2092 times)


26 review(s) for pornstar ruby (11 positive, 6 neutral, 9 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline Rstevens16

External Link/Members Only

background to finish off my trip of Romanian prossie posts, saw ruby a couple of months ago because she was so convenient. She's the one who convinced me to go see Christine and zasha.

comms awful. I mean her pimp will text you back quick enough, but she was late and basically useless.

location weird flats near Holborn. Might be a bit exposed though I was fine

appearance girl from the pics. Tiny and tight bodied, I was pretty pleased. Better looking face then I expected.

service shit. Just a shit vanilla service. She's a bit awkward and very mechanical. No atmosphere, no sense of relax and enjoy yourself, just a very vulgar you're here to cum so let's make you cum type attitude - and not in a good way. I did 30 mins for 70 quid.

verdict despite the shit services I would and probably will return. Some might think I'm doing the rest of us a disservice by supporting their shitty business practices but I think she's basically just about good looking enough that for 70 quid it's fair play. If you want a proper service, or if you don't mind spending a bit more, skip her.


mrhappypants

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
This is not a positive review.

Offline The_Don

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,385
  • Likes: 63
  •  
  • Reviews: 250
This is not a positive review.

Have a look at the others the OP has posted. I did this morning and found them perplexing IMO.

Offline tergil


punther

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
im with OP on this one

her service isn't great but she extremely attractive

haven't seen her since her boob job which im dissapointed she's had done as prior to this she was physically perfect: hair, face, skin, tits, ass, pussy lips, tight body, good hygiene

i think there are a lot of punters who even though a WGs service isn't great, as long as she does not actively do anything bad enough to ruin a punt or create bad blood they will continue to return to the WG as they find her physically attractive enough to block out things that if a WG they did not find quite as attractive did they would never return again

(this review reads more like a neutral/negative than a positive imo)
« Last Edit: June 07, 2018, 10:35:17 am by punther »

punther

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Rstevens16 whats your opinion on her new boobs?

Offline Rstevens16

Don't know about her new tits. When I saw her i think they were natural and decent, maybe the worst part of her otherwise nearly flawless figure. I can only imagine a couple of huge bolt ons will look like shit.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
All the warnings of negativity are here..
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Rstevens16



mrhappypants

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Then don't go and see her.

Point is your rating contributes to an aggregate and by giving a positive you appear to give an unconditional recommendation.  Reading your review it is far from it; that is not what your positive rating indicates.