Author Topic: Indian Dipali - east London. A bizarre punt  (Read 18054 times)


13 review(s) for IndianDipali (4 positive, 4 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by Sinz]

Offline Londonsfinest91

  • Age Check : 18+

  • Ban Countdown
    Loading...
  • Posts: 16
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Hahahahaha this is better than Eastenders...

CaptainRoscoe

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Wow, I always miss the action when I’m away.

Let me just say first of all I’m genuinely surprised by this. Sean70 and I have recommended different SPs to each other over the past year, I never once suspected he was a “pimp” in the old fashioned sense.

It is of course incriminating that he and Indian Dipali are sharing the same IP/Broadband. I’m not sure why they would do that knowing how UKP is real funny style about seeing that. This is one of those situations where the SP should’ve just ignored this review. Rarely does anything good come out of questioning the integrity of a review by an SP.

Do I think sean70 is a pimp/tout? I honestly do not. I actually believe what he has posted on here but it was a huge lack of judgement to do so. Again, I’m not being naive or trying to defend him. It’s just disappointing we’ve lost a good reviewer.

Oh well, onwards and upwards.
« Last Edit: January 24, 2018, 07:57:33 am by CaptainRoscoe »

holland

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Wow, I always miss the action when I’m away.

Let me just say first of all I’m genuinely surprised by this. Sean70 and I have recommended different SPs to each other over the past year, I never once suspected he was a “pimp” in the old fashioned sense.

It is of course incriminating that he and Indian Dipali are sharing the same IP/Broadband. I’m not sure why they would do that knowing how UKP is real funny style about seeing that. This is one of those situations where the SP should’ve just ignored this review. Rarely does anything good come out of questioning the integrity of a review by an SP.

Do I think sean70 is a pimp/tout? I honestly do not. I actually believe what he has posted on here but it was a huge lack of judgement to do so. Again, I’m not being naive or trying to defend him. It’s just disappointing we’ve lost a good reviewer.

Oh well, onwards and upwards.

After the latest development I will actually not consider his past reviews anymore.
He is a proved liar. :thumbsdown:

Offline SamLP

So in conclusion this must be a HECK of a WG for someone to book her two days in a row with an overnight the second day?
:rose:
Must be a HECK of a wg to do that when Sean was on a punting hiatus too.

Almost an admission to being a pimp.

Offline Londonsfinest91

  • Age Check : 18+

  • Ban Countdown
    Loading...
  • Posts: 16
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Surprisingly she's moved to Birmingham today...I wonder why  :sarcastic:

External Link/Members Only

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
Surprisingly she's moved to Birmingham today...I wonder why  :sarcastic:

External Link/Members Only

Probably attending another family wedding

Offline Raj_peters

Well that escalated quickly!

Jeez I take a week break from UKP and all this!

Deep down I was wondering whether me posting an honest as fuck review would trigger one of her loyalists to let her know she been reviewed and then trigger a response. I've been waiting for one on AW, but this is far better.

Give me a bit to reply to each message separately, there's a fuck ton to get through!

Offline Raj_peters


The Meet- short version as you call it.

I was late. Yes, I was. There are two reasons for this. One was I had a family wedding on which meant I had time pressure but this would only have been 5 or 10 minutes maximum. The other reason was you started communicating with me from a different number just before the meet time claiming the number you booked via AW the battery died. I became suspicious (this is a well-known scam), messaged a friend to get her opinion on it and debated if I should cancel. In the end I went with it. Hindsight is a wonderful thing!

Not mentioning the family wedding - fail
Not picking up my multiple calls to validate that my phone had died - another fail
Not responding to let me know you'd be very late - a massive fucking fail


Indian Dipali here

Outfit. You texted asking if I could wear a low cut top etc. I did not reply to that message as I was at the wedding. By the time I left that the venue that was the last thing on my mind. So, tell Mr Raj_Peters how does that constitute wrong outfit? Did I say yes? If it was so important you should have messaged again on which you would have received a reply saying no and if that is important to you then cancel.


Fucking respond to the txt and subsequent phone calls you daft cow



Smelly Breath. This one I do not know whether to laugh or cry or both. These are the facts. On arrival and due to the stress of the wedding I asked if you wanted any refreshments or anything to eat/nibbles as I was going to get a drink via room service. You said no. I also asked if you mind if I order a drink for myself then. You said go ahead. Now some guys don’t like the smell of alcohol so I always ask if I am in the mood for a glass of wine or something else. I must stress I rarely drink during meets but if I do I always ask. What baffles me is you were deep French kissing me for practically the entire meeting so if that was the case after the first kiss why did you continue? I know your talking shit and I think you do too!

I mean hang about, it couldn't have been that stressful a wedding - you were organising to meet and jump on my cock. What exactly are you stressed abour? It wasn't exactly the same hotel either.

The alcohol helped your breath - it was foul when you opened the door. I had hoped when you went to the bathroom you would've have freshened up like you said you were going to!

Let's be clear on this don't claim I was dfk'ing you the whole meet to give yourself some credibility, you're a lying Prossie trying to reclaim some business.




Heavy Accent. I was born in Singapore of Indian parentage. Why should I have a London or UK accent. Why do you need to mention this? What is your point? Do you think because you’re a British Born Indian (assume you are) you’re better than me? Are you one of those idiotic guys that go around calling other Indians “Freshies”

Apocalyptic orgasm which almost sent me limp. I am a highly sexed woman I can sometimes explode just thinking about sex. I can assure you there was nothing fake about it. I needed a release, I was stressed out. You went limp because you had popped your load not long after I started riding you so stop talking rubbish.

So overall, I accept my looks or tits or whatever really may not be to every guy or woman’s liking I have no problem with that. What’s that saying you English say One man’s meat is another man’s poison. I fully accept that. But please if your going to write a review don’t make shit up it is unnecessary. Finally, surprise surprise  you have conveniently forgotten to include in your review I gave you extra time to compensate for the late start to the meet which you gladly accepted. You took full advantage of that didn’t you Mr Raj_Peters whilst you fucked away!

Your accent is important to other punters, it's a heavy accent pure and simple. I couldn't give a fuck if you were born in Australia, Singapore, India or Angola. And yes you are a freshie, and yes I am one of those guys that would class you as one.
Big fucking deal, you're not here to be my girlfriend, bust my chops and enquirer ahout my personality, you are in this job to suck dick and take dick

Glad you got your release, although next time please 'explode just thinking about sex'
The shit you pulled was fucking weird and scary
How long I lasted is irrelevant, but I seem to remember you asking me to finish as I kept on going.

You didn't give extra time, you simply finished the meet an hour after the actual start time

Offline Raj_peters

And the reason you are sharing broadband is?

Admin you are amazing!

Offline Raj_peters

What
A
Bellend

Have dealt with your other comments in my substantive reply to admin.

Insofar as your comment and others that I may be a pimp and my choice of SP. Whist that is laughable I will receive it within the spirit it was intended. Your suspicious and probably want an explanation with what on face value appears doggy.

I am a non Asian chap attracted to women from the Indian Despora as are many punters. I do not question your choice of SP or others. Granted I have opinions on many punter choices and scratch my head quite often when reading reviews but I don't question it. It is their money so again cool. If you look at my comment where a punter asked what the attraction is to this ethnic group following my review of Pakistani Mahee you will see I have given my reasons. But if you missed it here it is again. My papers give me access to this group, other races I can fuck for free via my local pub or club so they are far lower down my punting spectrum. Whilst I am on my punting hiatus so to speak as a single chap I am doing exactly that!

25 reviews and over 400 plus contributions to this forum but I might be a pimp who has now been caught out. You can't make this shit up but hey! :dash:

Offline The Night King

Haha! Drama Drama! Not sure how I missed this thread over the last few days but Raj your experience mirrors mine so closely it makes her rebuttals even more ridiculous. The review I put up on Friday is now a bit after the fact but well done admin for sorting this all out!

Phaedrus

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Wow, I always miss the action when I’m away.

Let me just say first of all I’m genuinely surprised by this. Sean70 and I have recommended different SPs to each other over the past year, I never once suspected he was a “pimp” in the old fashioned sense.

It is of course incriminating that he and Indian Dipali are sharing the same IP/Broadband. I’m not sure why they would do that knowing how UKP is real funny style about seeing that. This is one of those situations where the SP should’ve just ignored this review. Rarely does anything good come out of questioning the integrity of a review by an SP.

Do I think sean70 is a pimp/tout? I honestly do not. I actually believe what he has posted on here but it was a huge lack of judgement to do so. Again, I’m not being naive or trying to defend him. It’s just disappointing we’ve lost a good reviewer.

Oh well, onwards and upwards.

I agree with Captain Roscoe here. Sean70 and I shared a lot of information about SP’s as he and I seemed to have a similar taste in SP’s and not once did I suspect he was a pimp or a tout. His comments and reviews always seemed to be well balanced.

I take what he has written on this thread at face value in that that he:

1. Had on overnight outcall with Dipali
2. That somehow the topic of reviews on UKP came up.
3. That Dipali got personally offended when she went on UKP and went against Sean70’s advice not to bother, and she wrote a rebuttal to the OP in the heat of the moment whilst at his house for an overnight.
4. That Sean70’s mistake was not considering the consequences of Dipali rebutting the review whilst over at his house sharing the same IP address and that this would give others the impression that he was colluding with her.

Or as he said:

Quote
  Was I aware of the review YES.

Did I play any part in her review NO.

Did she ask me what to about it. YES

What was my advice. Don't bother or waste your time. This is a punters forum not a pro$$ie forum. A punter is entitled to his opinion it is not a statement of fact.

Did she take my advice. No

Am I surprised she didn't take my advice. No

Why am I not surprised. Because I have punted her many times and know her personality. Simples!

Looking at plausibility here:

Having punted Dipali myself I can say that she is quite a strong character and I find it plausible that she went ahead in anger and rebutted the OP’s review. Sean70 has been on here for long enough to know what sort of response an SP who has written strong words in anger against a Punter’s opinion on here is likely to get and he would have known that she would likely get shot down and possibly banned so I also find it plausible that he didn’t help her to write the response and would have told her not to bother as he has claimed.

I do find his account plausible and I think that this is a case of Dipali being in wrong place at the wrong time. I think Sean70 has been unlucky and unfortunate and he should have told her to no way write write a rebuttal of OP’s review whilst on the overnight booking.

He has a broad spectrum of reviews with positive, neutral and negatives and doesn’t come across as a tout.

I echo Captain Roscoe’s sentiment that we have lost a good, well balanced and detailed reviewer who also liked to TOFTT.

However I accept that admin has the final say on this.

OldAdmin

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I've been around long enough to see through bullshit excuses, I won't ignore the fact she was using his broadband connection over multiple days, IIRC from 7am to 1am the following day, then again just 12 hours later, he had some extra relationship / link of some kind with her he failed to disclose.

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
I've been around long enough to see through bullshit excuses, I won't ignore the fact she was using his broadband connection over multiple days, IIRC from 7am to 1am the following day, then again just 12 hours later, he had some extra relationship / link of some kind with her he failed to disclose.

It's called Cognitive Dissonance - we are all guilty of it, when some idea or in this instance an idea about a 'respected' person gets challenged. It's far easier to dismiss the  sometime irrefutable empirical evidence, than it is to change our belief system - than to admit we are basically wrong !.

Personally, I can understand the need to stick up for a fellow punter who has been helpful and provided lots of information, in my case I think of Rockhard. I liked Sean70 but the evidence is irrefutable.

Can't beat Admin!!  :drinks:  ;)
« Last Edit: January 30, 2018, 06:18:21 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Raj_peters

I've been around long enough to see through bullshit excuses, I won't ignore the fact she was using his broadband connection over multiple days, IIRC from 7am to 1am the following day, then again just 12 hours later, he had some extra relationship / link of some kind with her he failed to disclose.

We all know the rules and we just need to follow them..the bit which fucks sean70 is that they were sharing the wifi connection
No chance in hell do I hand that shit out, even to the SP I regularly punt and have a decent punting relationship with.

It's crossing boundaries.

Admin knows best imho

Offline SamLP

I've been around long enough to see through bullshit excuses, I won't ignore the fact she was using his broadband connection over multiple days, IIRC from 7am to 1am the following day, then again just 12 hours later, he had some extra relationship / link of some kind with her he failed to disclose.
And that's what you call a slam dunk!

Callisto

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
My tuppence worth here is that I agree with Phaedrus and Captain Roscoe.  Sean70 made an error of judgement, yes, but the guy is self-evidently not a tout - just a bit of a clod on this occasion, and over-sentimental.  I respect admin's decision here, but, for what it's worth, I personally think it was too hasty. 

Meanwhile, define irony...

What
A
Bellend
« Last Edit: May 09, 2018, 11:19:14 pm by Callisto »

Phaedrus

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
It was a shame to have lost Sean70’s quality reviews and his taste in SP’s matched up with mine. As a result I am punting a bit less these days.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
It was a shame to have lost Sean70’s quality reviews and his taste in SP’s matched up with mine. As a result I am punting a bit less these days.

He was breaking admins rules and rightly got banned in my view, such posters are a waste of space. :thumbsdown:

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
My tuppence worth here is that I agree with Phaedrus and Captain Roscoe.  Sean70 made an error of judgement, yes, but the guy is self-evidently not a tout - just a bit of a clod on this occasion, and over-sentimental.  I respect admin's decision here, but, for what it's worth, I personally think it was too hasty. 

Meanwhile, define irony...

Sean70 lied and admin quite rightly banned him, UKP doesn't need proven liars in my book.

Offline Shagalott

Sean70 lied and admin quite rightly banned him, UKP doesn't need proven liars in my book.


Just when you thought you couldn't beat 'Shaun of the Dead', here come 'Sean of the Bed'!