Author Topic: Victoria Ashley (Outcall)  (Read 9165 times)


2 review(s) for Victoria Ashley (1 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by The_Don]

Offline Hobbit

External Link/Members Only

Having read Monstar's review https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=119203.0 I thought I'd give Victoria a try as she sounded good. However, my experience with her was not quite the same. It was a difficult decision whether to give this review a negative or a neutral.

The negatives were:
1) Her phone rang twice during our session and she went to address it on both occasions but didn't turn it off or put it on silent.
2) She didn't initiate round two.
3) Too much talking and it kind of felt like a bit of time wasting but I can't be sure as it may just be her nature.


Communication
No complaints with comms, she responds quickly and requests to have a brief chat on the phone before meeting. It's a nice feature and makes one feel a little more relaxed before the meet. I wish more girls would do this.

Appearance
Pictures are accurate and she is very attractive. Age, I would say between 26-28. Best feature are her breasts which are natural and drop perfectly.

Meeting:
Started off with some kissing which wasn't DFK but would say FK. It was okay, wasn't the best. I then went down for some RO and she was clean and fresh. Moved on to some oral, which was oral with. I did ask her if she does OWO and she said no. Her Oral was okay, quite deep but her selection of condoms could have been better as it lacked sensation, but I should have expected that as it was OW. There was no ball licking either but I didn't ask.

Sex was in cowgirl first and then missionary. Talked for a while and then realised she was not trying for round two. By then I had lost interest in her, probably because of all the talking I had to listen to. So I got dressed and said my goodbyes.

Overall
I don't think I would be returning because I don't feel the service she is providing is value for money. £200 per hour, without OWO or CIM for me it is not worth it. From now on I have decided that I will not be seeing anyone that doesn't provide OWO as it makes a big difference.

Offline The_Don

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,515
  • Likes: 68
  •  
  • Reviews: 250
Overall
I don't think I would be returning because I don't feel the service she is providing is value for money. £200 per hour, without OWO or CIM for me it is not worth it. From now on I have decided that I will not be seeing anyone that doesn't provide OWO as it makes a big difference.


Thanks for the review and sorry to hear, its wasn't VFM (at her current rate that £3.33 per minute) 


. However, my experience with her was not quite the same. It was a difficult decision whether to give this review a negative or a neutral.

The negatives were:
1) Her phone rang twice during our session and she went to address it on both occasions but didn't turn it off or put it on silent.
2) She didn't initiate round two.
3) Too much talking and it kind of felt like a bit of time wasting but I can't be sure as it may just be her nature.





Clearly lots of negative points.

Phone play bugs me, during a punt, as well.

If there time and energy, round 2 or shouldn't be an issue, IMO.

To much talking can be viewed as time wasting, IMO.


Offline Hobbit


Thanks for the review and sorry to hear, its wasn't VFM (at her current rate that £3.33 per minute) 



Clearly lots of negative points.

Phone play bugs me, during a punt, as well.

If there time and energy, round 2 or shouldn't be an issue, IMO.

To much talking can be viewed as time wasting, IMO.

It was a tough decision whether to give this a negative or not. But for me the main thing was VFM. I really don't like spending £200 and leaving very let down. It can almost be a soul destroying kind of feeling.

Offline The_Don

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,515
  • Likes: 68
  •  
  • Reviews: 250
It was a tough decision whether to give this a negative or not.

It your review and punt. Some times, fine line between ratings.


But for me the main thing was VFM. I really don't like spending £200 and leaving very let down. It can almost be a soul destroying kind of feeling.

Most punters have been there:



That Punting:
 

is wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid  ;)


Good luck on your next punt  :hi:

Offline monstar

Sorry to hear you had a disappointing experience with Victoria, especially after reading my review!  :(

Justified neutral/negatives and not acceptable at £200ph. I only met her twice and none of your negatives then, however both were two hour bookings (£350 at the time) so may have influenced her performance.  :unknown:

Hope your next punt is positive.

Offline Hobbit

Sorry to hear you had a disappointing experience with Victoria, especially after reading my review!  :(

Justified neutral/negatives and not acceptable at £200ph. I only met her twice and none of your negatives then, however both were two hour bookings (£350 at the time) so may have influenced her performance.  :unknown:

Hope your next punt is positive.

That's okay. However, it shouldn't matter if the booking is 1 hour or more, the quality of service should remain the same. But come to think of it, remembering some of her conversation she did sound money orientated, so you might be right about receiving a better service for longer bookings. Nevertheless, there's no way I would consider paying £350 for oral with.

Offline hw189

"Communication
No complaints with comms, she responds quickly and ....."

Not met VA, but I did send 2 initial email queries to her in the past as I was interested in meeting her.
My experience of her responses were somewhat slow, almost to the point where I got the impression that she wasn't interested / ignoring me / reluctant to meet me. No problem reading my email messages I sent; I could see that VA had read my email messages almost immediately after I had sent them to her. Its just that she took over a day to respond to my first email (ok, acceptable) but over 5 days to respond to my 2nd email message. This was also in the week where she wasn't working and making changes to her profile / site and was still logging into AW on a daily basis.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Looks hot
But at 5'1 is a midget
I am 6'5"
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac



Offline FCB

« Last Edit: January 17, 2018, 01:32:57 am by FCB »

Offline FCB


Thanks for the review and sorry to hear, its wasn't VFM (at her current rate that £3.33 per minute)


She's put her rates up, currently £220/an hour

So now it's £3.66 per minute
A bit over 6 pence per second

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: January 17, 2018, 02:27:05 am by FCB »

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
What was the location of your punt OP ?

DylanPerry

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Resorting to backpage and a suspect (possibly even self done) review...dusty phone for sure. Yet, it seems she's upped her prices 🤔.
Some WGs certainly have an ego...it's quite cute.

Offline GeorgeForeman


Don't agree- it shows stupidity and arrogance on her part :dash:

DylanPerry

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
No we agree lol. "Ego" was alluding to arrogance.
"Quite cute" was certainly sarcastic lol
« Last Edit: January 17, 2018, 02:29:58 pm by DylanPerry »

Offline GeorgeForeman


I did wonder whether you were being sarcastic or not, thanks for confirming you were!  :drinks:

DylanPerry

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Yeah.
I'm intrigued to see how pretty she is facially.
She certainly sees herself as a high end companion type, but my guess is she hasn't cracked the market (so perhaps add 'deluded' to list of words used to describe her).
Working out of places such as Algate East (I'm a proud East London boy, but can say it how it is), and apartments with CCTV in the room  :scare: certainly don't help this cause, and that's before we get to the actual service itself.

Her value is probably in no extra for anal, but the three who have reviewed her on here didn't go for it. I'm inclined to think it would be a restrictive service especially where size is concerned.
« Last Edit: January 17, 2018, 03:13:43 pm by DylanPerry »

Offline dubhcarr

well shes going to Edinburgh so lets see how the patriots get on with her pricing.........

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
well shes going to Edinburgh so lets see how the patriots get on with her pricing.........

I thought the scotch were a nation of tight wads.   :sarcastic:

Offline dubhcarr

so she might not be busy unless she rents by the minute.......?

Offline johnny34

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,038
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 41

Her value is probably in no extra for anal, but the three who have reviewed her on here didn't go for it. I'm inclined to think it would be a restrictive service especially where size is concerned.

??? Anal extra £70

DylanPerry

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
??? Anal extra £70

Jesus Christi of Bethlehem. Ridiculous.

Crossed wires on my part...could have sworn when I enquired with her once last year she said inclusive (but at discretion).

Offline johnny34

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,038
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 41
Jesus Christi of Bethlehem. Ridiculous.

Crossed wires on my part...could have sworn when I enquired with her once last year she said inclusive (but at discretion).

Its in her 'Fine Print' tab on her Aw profile.

DylanPerry

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Its in her 'Fine Print' tab on her Aw profile.

Yeah I did diligence after you corrected me and I found it.
I'd call it a quite literal fine print...usually extras listed on main tab and/or FAQs!

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Looks hot
But at 5'1 is a midget
I am 6'5"

But her clit is probably bigger than your cock  :music:

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
"Communication
No complaints with comms, she responds quickly and ....."

Not met VA, but I did send 2 initial email queries to her in the past as I was interested in meeting her.
My experience of her responses were somewhat slow, almost to the point where I got the impression that she wasn't interested / ignoring me / reluctant to meet me. No problem reading my email messages I sent; I could see that VA had read my email messages almost immediately after I had sent them to her. Its just that she took over a day to respond to my first email (ok, acceptable) but over 5 days to respond to my 2nd email message. This was also in the week where she wasn't working and making changes to her profile / site and was still logging into AW on a daily basis.

She's not happy with your post, it's among one of the many reports she's made  :wacko:

Offline hw189

She's not happy with your post, it's among one of the many reports she's made  :wacko:

Wow, seriously? She's reporting it now, almost a year after I posted it?! Certainly beats the 5 day response it took her to respond to my email query back then. Things do appear to work slowly and leisurely in her world.

I should have added, the expected response from my email queries to VA were no more than a yes / no type (single statement) response, which shouldn't have taken anyone any more than a minute or 2 to read / think and respond back to. If I recall, VA read my email queries pretty much instantly and within an hour of me sending it to her, but it still took her over 5 days to respond to and (as expected) it was no more than a one line statement response from her (the reason why I stated my doubts about her last year).

Still, at least VA had the decency to reply back to me even if it was late / delayed. It is a lot more than I can say for her friend Amelia Rose Chambers, who arrogantly and unprofessionally ignored / deleted my email.
« Last Edit: January 19, 2018, 02:19:13 am by hw189 »

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
If the review doesn't put you off this one , her punter hating bile post will.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=179062.msg1896236#msg1896236

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
She's not happy with your post, it's among one of the many reports she's made  :wacko:

She enjoying the delusion that anyone gives a shit.

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Regraded as Negative at reviewers request  :music:

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Regraded as Negative at reviewers request  :music:

oh dear, bet her kiwi blood is boiling.   :lol: :lol: :lol:

Offline JimArtois

I do wonder sometimes whether these girls rely on the old saying of 'there is no such thing as bad publicity'. I had never come across this girl before but now she is the hot topic on this board (I have no interest at the rates she charges so not white knighting). Similarly, is WelshElise being cute by posting on this thread, (I cannot deny she has piqued my interest)

Offline dubhcarr

I do wonder sometimes whether these girls rely on the old saying of 'there is no such thing as bad publicity'. I had never come across this girl before but now she is the hot topic on this board (I have no interest at the rates she charges so not white knighting). Similarly, is WelshElise being cute by posting on this thread, (I cannot deny she has piqued my interest)

just two out of tens and tens of thousands.......everywhere you look in this sweetshop there is choice........and it is a cat eat cat trade so yeh lots of girls are cute to jump on the bandwagon ...........these threads are probably worth a few strategically placed tit and pussy pics..........