Ok yoi are saying this based on her reviews and pricing i take it?
Pics do look good.
Totally taz. She has 3 iffy reviews on here BUT seems highly rated on AW. Now, we seasoned punters all know to take AW with a pinch of the white stuff (salt, that is) but that’s still a gaping chasm between the two review sites!
And at £100 h/h and £150 hour she’s defo on the high side of pricing. Based on the UKP reviews, her service isn’t great and her pictures are questionable. In fact, she has a review from July 2016 which states a clear suspicion she’s using fake pictures. Maybe not now but still, this OP also questions the pics and she’s “a bit curvier” (direct quote) than her profile pics.
All in all, my Spidey-Senses tell me something not quite right with this WG and her 47 reviews on AW may be slightly on the exaggerated side.
But don’t let me put you off dude, go give her a rattle and prove me wrong
