Angel Foxx - Foxy but not an Angel ;) - North Hampshire

[albedo39]

My first review on UKP

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Location: Private residence in North Hampshire - Ewshot area - has moved within area in recent months so may not be where I saw her originally, (Oct 2017).

Type of punt: Had considered visiting for a while although Angel is not available everyday. I prefer spontaneous meets so contacted her by email when I noticed her as 'available.' My emails responded to with enthusiasm. I had viewed some of her online vids so knew was I was getting.

Description: Attractive, 40's well-dressed for the occassion. Online pics/vids vey accurate. Knows what she likes

Contact: Requested 15-min blow n go sesh (£50) with her dressed in day clothes (I just love the slutiness of it all ). Her profile gives distinct impression that she enjoys what she does and meet confirmed it. Arrived on time and telephoned as agreed. She provided clear details and access was via security-controlled gates (so i couldn't get away easy ) - I jest - it was fine .
She looked 'on the money' and had a very sexual manner about her. A bit of (very brief) small talk ensued. Clearly up for some filth I did the paperwork and she wasted no time in some DFK while we explored each other. I was keen to do her some RO and sat her back while I pulled her knickers aside and had an eating frenzy. She bucked and trembled a couple of times indicating enjoyment. Anyway out with the little man which she readily engulfed OW (almost greedily ). Something I had not experienced before was that it seemed to be that she was trembling with excitement while sucking. I'd like to think it's because I appealed to her sexually but think she may be on the edge of nympho if not actually one as I feel none of her manner was false.

Summary: A first class punt in a safe environment and more time would doubtless have led to some extended filth indeed. I WILL be returning  Those of a nervous disposition, go to the gym beforehand.

[Derrick101]

Fully agree albedo. I saw hey before I joined UK punting and left absolutely shattered. She is full on horny. Well worth a longer visit.

[mh]

40's????????

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Derrick101]

I'd say late 40's.

[mh]

I'd say late 40's.

I'd say "late 40's/early 60's". 

[albedo39]

I considerably aged during my visit but IMHO if ever there was an example of a WG that it was a pleasure to pay for, she is it 

[Sweettunes]

Gotta be mid 50s..... age is just a number as you had a good punt

 

[Derrick101]

Gotta be mid 50s..... age is just a number as you had a good punt

 

As you say, age is a number   I saw here about a year ago, and will review if it's worthwhile. It was an exhausting punt, and as OP noted, she's verging on a nymph. As OP and myself have noted, probably mid to late 40's. With the enthusiasm and stamina of a 30yo.  Sorry if that's a bit fluffy.

[mh]

I considerably aged during my visit but IMHO if ever there was an example of a WG that it was a pleasure to pay for, she is it 

I wasn't querying her performance, she could be very energetic. But her claimed age seems very at odds with her photos.

My wife's friends are all now over 50 and not one of them looks anywhere near as aged as this WG in her profile and gallery pics.

[albedo39]

I wasn't querying her performance, she could be very energetic. But her claimed age seems very at odds with her photos.

My wife's friends are all now over 50 and not one of them looks anywhere near as aged as this WG in her profile and gallery pics.

Perhaps you......should've gone to SpecSavers 

[mh]

Perhaps you......should've gone to SpecSavers 

Me? Really?


Hidden Image/Members Only

[albedo39]

Yes, you. Have you met her?, no! Whether she's 40/50/60 or otherwise, unless I'm mistaken this is a review site where those that have experience can post for the benefit of others. Not for people with too much time on their hands to vent their unwanted opinon/comments about any form of discrimination. Take it elsewhere bud - nobody cares! 

Consider yourself ignored! 

[mh]

Yes, you. Have you met her?, no! Whether she's 40/50/60 or otherwise, unless I'm mistaken this is a review site where those that have experience can post for the benefit of others. Not for people with too much time on their hands to vent their unwanted opinon/comments about any form of discrimination. Take it elsewhere bud - nobody cares! 

Consider yourself ignored! 

Ha ha! Well I'll cry floods of crocodile tears over being ignored by a 1 review, 22 post newbie.

I have every right to comment on an obvious disparity between a claimed age and photos that tell a different story. To reiterate:

I wasn't querying her performance, she could be very energetic. But her claimed age seems very at odds with her photos.

I have to say you're very touchy, nay, protective regarding Angel's honour. If not quite a white knight then perhaps you are her equerry?

[Derrick101]

Ha ha! Well I'll cry floods of crocodile tears over being ignored by a 1 review, 22 post newbie.

I have every right to comment on an obvious disparity between a claimed age and photos that tell a different story. To reiterate:

I have to say you're very touchy, nay, protective regarding Angel's honour. If not quite a white knight then perhaps you are her equerry?

Agreed MH, you have every right to comment, but OP has every right to respond. Whilst I agree, this SP is certainly not 40, she is probably late 40's early 50's. I'm early 60's so have some experience of more mature SP's including this one. 

[mh]

OP has every right to respond

Yep and I didn't criticise him for responding, he suggested I needed an eye test so I just offered the evidence I saw with my Mr Magoo eyes. It didn't need a flouncy strop.
 

[Derrick101]

It didn't need a flouncy strop.
 

He's a newbie ! He'll learn, like I did ! It takes some time to get used to the humour here.

[mh]

He's a newbie ! He'll learn, like I did ! It takes some time to get used to the humour here.

He may not last long enough to learn if he flies off the handle at the first criticism of a WG he has reviewed.

[Murray Mint]

Thanks for the review albedo. Don’t get worked up by this silly age argument. If you like what you see in the profile and your punt then meets or exceeds your expectation then that’s what matters. Others are able to make their own judgement about an SP's age.

Anyway, my question to you or others who have seen Angel Foxx (Sam, is it?) is, I see she smokes. Was this overly apparent either in her apartment or whilst kissing? It can be off-putting.

[Derrick101]

The smell of smoke was not evident at all when I saw her about a year ago. Either on her or in the apartment.

[albedo39]

Thanks for the review albedo. Don’t get worked up by this silly age argument. If you like what you see in the profile and your punt then meets or exceeds your expectation then that’s what matters. Others are able to make their own judgement about an SP's age.

Anyway, my question to you or others who have seen Angel Foxx (Sam, is it?) is, I see she smokes. Was this overly apparent either in her apartment or whilst kissing? It can be off-putting.

Thanks Minty, as a reformed smoker, the worst kind I know, (stopped 30 years since) I am very sensitive to smokers, also heavy perfume. In both regards I was not of the impression she was a smoker as both her and the environment seemed fine.

[Murray Mint]

Thank you both for that info. I shall endeavour to see the lady at some point!

[Sedition]

Saw her a couple of times a while ago and she admitted then to being 46... which was about 2 years ago...  so about normal prossie age reality/fantasy....(why do they fucking bother?) to be fair she looked a lot better than in that pic.
Was a good punt ... might try a rematch