Sugar Baby?
Masaj
Shemales

Author Topic: Lucy GEA Glasgow  (Read 1866 times)

hardtoplease

  • Guest
External Link/Members Only

1 hour incall £150

I've left this at positive because, on balance, it was. But I have to say, GEA should be done under the trades description act because the website photos of this girl have been photoshopped tae fuck which makes me so  :angry: But anyway, this is my honest review.

COMMS - all done by text, very professional and zero issues at all. I'd originally scoped out this punt the evening before and had decided on two girls - Maria and Lucy - mainly because they would be available at the times I needed and they both advertise taking it in the ass. However, based on 2 positives for Lucy on UKP and Maria has a negative, I chose Lucy.

LOCATION
- usual flat near the Clyde that I think everyone already knows about. Buzzer entry etc then into a modern flat which is built for punting i.e. the bare essentials. But warm and clean.

LOOKS - now, this is where I get so angry. Website says age 30, 5'8", size 8 and size 34c titties. Age - dubious, more mid thirties or her paper round was in Beirut. Height and size - I'd say bang on the money. Tits more like a 34A and saggy as fuck. Clearly Lucy has had a bairn and she told me so. Her mum-tum (previously noted in other reviews) isn't too prominent TBF. But her tits have had all the life sucked out them and look like a pair of socks filled with marbles. If you look at the website, they are pert and large - no they fucking ain't  :dash: and she is covered in freckles - again, zero sign of this on the website. As regards facially, she failed my "would I in a pub" measure as she is just, well, plain ordinary, no "wow" factor at all. And there was a strong aroma of fag reek. So, I dithered and thought about leaving but decided she seemed personable enough, I didn't really have time to seek out a plan B, so paid my dues and went for it.

ACTION - I was up front about it and told Lucy I was there for her ass, not her pussy. No problems. Started with some OWO which was excellent, deep and gaggy. Then on with the dom, fucked her mish in the pussy for target practice then into the brown starfish to which she gave a wee yelp when I broke the seal (do like that part  :dance: ) and fucked her ass, changing from soft to hard. Then flipped her sideaways for a bit so I could get a good finger and rub at her snatch and then rolled her over fully on her front and banged her prone-bone for a bit. All during this, Lucy made a great show of enjoying herself, all the right noises and seemed well into it. As I got near to the finish, I asked where she wanted my spunk - mouth or ass - she choose ass but said CIM was no problem at all. I was well into the ass fucking so decided to finish in the dom. That took me to 25 mins into my slot and was, TBH, a great fuck session  :crazy:

Even though I had plenty time left I wasn't up for second pop so just lay on the bed, chatted about shite, dressed when I had 5 mins to go and left bang on time.

CONCLUSION as I said, Lucy is a nice girl with a good personality and she took a good ass fuckin. Overall, my time spent with her and in her was great. I should maybe say, for those who like to stay in the front lane, her pussy was very tight  :thumbsup: and would satisfy most punters. But the heavily doctored website photos; the fainted titties; the reek of fags and her rather plain-Jane looks all mean I wouldn't go back. As regards GEA, tried them twice recently and feel let down on both occasions, so they are now on my blacklist - all of them  :mad:

Offline zag69

Good review, very entertaining  :D

Offline pilgrim

A good comprehensive review Randy.   I presume that to be a Freudian slip when you say “.. just lay on the bed, chatted about shite,..”?  After an Anal session with Lucy?

Lucys MO seems to be come in early and set up camp in one of the rooms and do a shift till mid afternoon, certainly for schooldays during the week but does longer at the weekends.  Ive seen her in passing, after she returned from a fag break on the balcony.  She was dressed in a blouse and jeans and I have to agree that she was rather plain facially.  I didn’t think she was 5’8”, probably shorter.  She is frecally but so are 99% of ginger jocks so that shouldn’t be a shock to anyone.  She does get booked up and I think that’s down to her being the youngest/best of the group offering Anal.
 
The agency photographer deserves a medal for her performance with the profile pics for all the WGs.  You have to ask yourself questions about the sets, Why is she hiding her stomach?  Why are all the shots of pendulum boobs/cleavage.  Why are these sets years old, Robyn, Tara, Marnie (AW External Link/Members Only  or External Link/Members Only ) Erin and Katie.  Jazzman was great at recording the various profile shots and putting an age bracket on them.

hardtoplease

  • Guest

hardtoplease

  • Guest
A good comprehensive review Randy.   I presume that to be a Freudian slip when you say “.. just lay on the bed, chatted about shite,..”?  After an Anal session with Lucy?

Guilty as charged  :crazy: :wacko:


Rangerslad

  • Guest
Good review thanks

I seen and reviewed Alex lately. The pics on the site aren’t quite accurate I expected her to be a bit heavier but I wasn’t disappointed with her looks or the punt