Author Topic: Glasgow - GushinVicky x21  (Read 1148 times)


1 review(s) for GushinVicky x21 (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Sinz]

Offline PR67

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Had a half hour with Gushinvicky a few days ago. Think she should change her name to RushinVicky!

Flat was decent and is located near High Street clock tower. Half hour was £70.

Comms were easy; phoned up for time and she sent address. I had thought she was British when I initially read her profile but she had an Eastern European accent, but spoke decent English, and only noticed after I called that it says 'primary language: Polish' in the interview bit.

Pictures are accurate. She's tall with a great body and decent tits. She's not all that good looking though, ok but not great. Mostly basing opinion of her body on what I saw with my eyes rather than touch because every second she was like 'too hard' 'don't touch there' etc. She was pleasant about it and didn't really come across like she wanted me out of there but it doesn't match up to the pish written on her profile; she's also not blonde so she probably didn't write it(only just noticed this).

She started off with OW. It was average. It has OWO on her profile but whenever a profile has no CIM I'm never expecting OWO. It's not a deal breaker for me anyway. She was ok on top but wouldn't go right down on my cock. She then wanted me to go on top and positioned herself so I couldn't get that deep. She started to try wank me off while I'm inside her to get me to cum. This is 10 minutes into booking. She also refused to do doggy because she's 'too sore'. That pissed me off a bit as it's the position I like to cum in most and I think her arse would've looked pretty good bent over. Decided to just try and cum as quickly as possible and get out of there. Didn't bother with a shower and I was outside 15 minutes after I arrived.

If she done doggy and took me deeper this would probably be a neutral but that mixed in with 'no touching here' pish then it has to be a negative. Suppose it's always a negative when afterwards you wish you spent your money elsewhere.

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Well done for TOFTT...especially with a non verified profile and no feedback.

I had looked at the profile earlier in the week and those toes in the black stockings had me all excited but there was too much going against the profile for me to take the risk.

Def one off who has been scored off the HL

Hidden Image/Members Only
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Plenty of WGs do OWO that don't have CIM on their profile...In my experience anyway... :unknown: