Nicolle xxx. (Positive but please read review)

[robbie54321]

External Link/Members Only    Previous profile. Now gone

External Link/Members Only  New profile

After the disappointment of SA London, hard work, lots of flakes, lots of fat chicks, not sure if London is really worth it.. anyway, enough of my SA rant

Back to punting!

Had no idea this was the same girl I negative reviewed! The profile pictures look nothing like her at all!
And she’s moved!
She didn’t recognise me but I knew her.
Didn’t walk obversely, those tits are pretty amazing!

However
Due to the fact I’ve been fucked about by so many SA girls Nichole was a dream! Slim waist, nice arse and those massive tits! No bullshit, booked and done, just what the doctor ordered😊

Anyway, same as before, no kissing, no touching the hair, very mechanical but... I enjoyed it!!!
Didn’t take any calls this time and no texts
Not returning though

I know, should be a neutral at best but I needed it!!

[Steely Dan]

Thanks for review.  Very amusing.

(And dubhcarr, you don't need to index old profile.  Just means we manually need to adjust the review count.  You have given her two positives, now need to remove one.  There is a fix to the software possible but it is not in place just now and Admin has other things to do.  Linking old profile is enough)

[LLPunting]

A positive just because you've been drowning in shite and she's the first pussy you've nutted in for a while   

A genuine, blind B&S is at best a Neutral.  Your review of her services denied or rendered make this a clear negative at 150ph!! 

[Sinz]

Manipulating the status review so that punters read your review is just so dumb.

You are a long standing member and surely should know better than being an attention seeker.

[dubhcarr]

Thanks for review.  Very amusing.

(And dubhcarr, you don't need to index old profile.  Just means we manually need to adjust the review count.  You have given her two positives, now need to remove one.  There is a fix to the software possible but it is not in place just now and Admin has other things to do.  [b]Linking old profile is enough[/b])

not sure what you mean here as linking to old profiles gives a better history of the prossie especially if they change profile...assuming its the same girl......as for two positives not sure what you mean as the review count is the review count.....

[Hobbit]

External Link/Members Only    Previous profile. Now gone

External Link/Members Only  New profile

After the disappointment of SA London, hard work, lots of flakes, lots of fat chicks, not sure if London is really worth it.. anyway, enough of my SA rant

Back to punting!

Had no idea this was the same girl I negative reviewed! The profile pictures look nothing like her at all!
And she’s moved!
She didn’t recognise me but I knew her.
Didn’t walk obversely, those tits are pretty amazing!

However
Due to the fact I’ve been fucked about by so many SA girls Nichole was a dream! Slim waist, nice arse and those massive tits! No bullshit, booked and done, just what the doctor ordered😊

Anyway, same as before, no kissing, no touching the hair, very mechanical but... I enjoyed it!!!
Didn’t take any calls this time and no texts
Not returning though

I know, should be a neutral at best but I needed it!!

I'm sorry but this sounds like a negative written all over it. No kissing, no touching the hair and is mechanical. She sounds like a robot rather than a human.

I fully understand, it is your review and you can give it any rating as you like but the way you've written it, it makes it sound like a negative than a positive.

[mrhappypants]

not sure what you mean here as linking to old profiles gives a better history of the prossie especially if they change profile...assuming its the same girl......as for two positives not sure what you mean as the review count is the review count.....

I think Steely Dan’s point is that, by indexing two profiles, both will record a positive in the aggregate - thus artificially inflating the number of positive reviews as recorded in the aggregate for this SP.

A positive just because you've been drowning in shite and she's the first pussy you've nutted in for a while   

A genuine, blind B&S is at best a Neutral.  Your review of her services denied or rendered make this a clear negative at 150ph!! 

Robbie54321,  I think it is becoming clear that  the impact on the aggregate is a primary consideration when arriving at an overal rating.  In this way, if you frame this review as a neutral you flag through the aggregate an issue which other punters might want to consider before deciding to visit. 

[Steely Dan]

I think Steely Dan’s point is that, by indexing two profiles, both will record a positive in the aggregate - thus artificially inflating the number of positive reviews as recorded in the aggregate for this SP.

Yes exactly. Indexing is not the same as adding a link.  Linking helps punters find the review.  It tracks name change. The OP added both links.

Indexing adds to the count on PuntiWiki.  So you have given her old name a positive. And her new name a positive.  So when we add them up she gets two positives.  Of course any of us can manually move it down again.  Just saying it is clear you are trying to help by indexing. Your intent is good. But in fact you are causing work for Admin or another editor.

Double indexing is perfect for a MFF.