MissbehavingMilf - Doncaster tour.

[Newtothisstuff]

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Overall, I'd rate this punt as a positive, but I'm still not sure if I'd go back.

I met MissbehavingMilf in a hotel in Doncaster. It was a cheap and crappy motel sort of place but that meant there was no reception to get past. Just park up and walk to the room.
Mel has quite a few photos on her profile and I think they're getting a little dated. She is obviously the same woman, but her photos do make her look younger and slimmer than she is. She's not fat. Being picky, she's probably just a dress size larger than I'd expected.
That said, she's not unattractive and has a nice pair of tits.
Where she makes up for the difference between her photos and reality is her service. She's one of the few girls I have come across who does what she says she offers and doesn't charge extras or declare that it's not available for whatever reason. In fact, she'll let you do pretty much anything that you want to her.
After starting with OWO, she was more than happy to be tied up, have her underwear ripped off and banged up the arse (covered). She was chatty before we got started and again while we got our breath back. She was even happy to let me video the whole thing. All she asked was that I let her wear a mask while the camera was on.
She was obviously uncomfortable when we started anal as although my cock is pretty average, it's quite thick so most girls won't do anal with me. She was obviously not comfortable at first but she didn't let that stop me. Once we got going, she seemed to be really enjoying it. The harder I banged her are,  the more she liked it. She seems to really enjoy being abused.
So, that's the reason she gets a positive. She may not look exactly like her AW profile picture's, but she's really friendly and if she agrees to do something - she does it. Sadly, that's getting to be a rarity now.

[TomBaker]

Thanks for the review ....

I saw Mel in Stockport back in 2010 when she was SubMel4U .... Very enjoyable ... Good to see she's still working.

The thing I liked most about Mel is that she has a very tasty pussy .... I could smell her while I was sitting over her.

[cueball]

Her reviews on here are a mixed bag to say the least.

Whilst I'm glad you enjoyed op, I'd say it is safe to assume this lass is unpredictable with her performance.

[Thechaser]

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that but she looks like a tired old workhorse and not to mention she looks different in each of her pictures!

Fair play you maintained a boner OP!

[Newtothisstuff]

That's a fair comment.  I think 'not unattractive' is probably a fair (possibly generous) description. She's no 18 year old stunner. She's about 40 and a little larger and older than her photos. As with any WG, they seem to look different from one day to the next. Catch them on a good day when they're all smiles and they look a lot better than a bad day when you get met with a frown.
If you take into account her actual age and figure size, she's pretty much what I'd have expected.
The reason for the positive review was that although her photos were giving the impression of someone younger and slimmer, she is up for anything. I'm sick to death of girls saying one thing before the booking and another when you arrive. I hate being told something is either not available after all or there's an extra fee. I only carry the exact money when I go to a booking for safety so if something is extra, I don't have the option. Plus, on principal I refuse to pay extra for something that was previously agreed.
It was a toss up between a neutral and a positive review status. The old photos would normally push me towards a negative or neutral review status just because of the dishonesty.  In this case though, I gave her a positive just on the basis that she was willing to do everything and anything I wanted so long as penetration was protected.