Author Topic: Hannah Banks & Shannon Summers - Norwich (NR1)  (Read 9192 times)


42 review(s) for HannahBanks (33 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]
20 review(s) for Shannon Summers (15 positive, 1 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline BuiltForSpeed

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

WGs - Hannah Banks & Shannon Summers duo. Originally was intending to go just with Hannah (more my type) but my dick did the deciding and I booked for a threesome with Shannon involved too. Hannah is slim and petite - she has a nice face, but nothing that I would class as standout. Nice tight body with a good bump to her bum and small, pert tits. A little on the shy side maybe. Shannon is exactly as her profile photos show - good curves, big tits, blonde and a bit ditsy and loud.

Location: Norwich (NR1) near to Riverside Retail Park. Flat in generic block. Discreet - people passing by but unaware of what's going on.

Length of visit: 1 hour - £240

Pre-punt comms: Contacted Hannah Banks through AW to see if she was available during a weekend away with work. Our calendars matched, but I also saw she was offering duos. I enquired to who it was, and Shannon Summers was the 'other girl'. Browsed her SW profile etc and she reminded me of a classic porn star I used to beat off to in my teens - big boobs, round ass etc etc and not my normal go-to but I thought what the hell. Arranged date and time. Parked up and rang Hannah as instructed on the day. The girls were running a little late but text me after about 10 minutes to say they were ready and have me the full address.

The punt: Shannon opened the door to me wearing classic WG-stereotype clothing - "negligee and heels" as my dad used to say  :D She was friendly and chatty and walked me through to the bedroom where Hannah was sitting on the edge of the bed. Introductions done, I was eyeing them both up as paperwork and do's/don'ts were agreed. Action took place in a basic bedroom with large double bed, some chest of drawers and a little stereo playing some crap local radio music.

We started on the bed with a bit of mutual kissing (tongues were involved but no DFK - I didn't really try) and removing various bits of remaining underwear from each other, mainly off me and Hannah, with Shannon keeping her knickers and bra on. Bit of a HJ from Shannon whilst I kissed Hannah's boobs and felt her bum (nice and firm). The jacket onto me and the girls alternated with OW which was good - both offer very different approaches with Hannah being more subtle and Shannon giving a harder demonstration. If you're looking for a classic, back of the throat gurgling head bob the Shannon is your girl and I can see why some people have enjoyed her HJ and BJ. Anyway, my little man became a strapping lad and was ready for action so Hannah climbed on while Hannah rode me CG. Hannah is nice and tight and her little tits bouncing are lovely to watch, but she just didn't give much feedback - just bobbed away silently. As a further unpassionate addition, Shannon just sat next to us and made some fake and crude oo's and aah's whilst pretending to play with herself. Even David Blunkett's dog wouldn't have bought that one! I tried to involve Shannon by playing with her tits and getting her to help Hannah's bum up and down on my dick, but it was obvious there wasn't really any sexual chemistry between the two girls and it all felt a bit robotic and practised.

I was determined to get some good fun out of my investment, so invited Shannon to have a ride and Hannah to come sit on my face, and the girls could play with each other. Shannon slipped her knickers aside and grabbed a new mac for me (at least she observes some good sexual health practice) and hopped on, quite literally. Hannah wriggled he bum over me and I did get to admire a good view as I licked her out, but the almost laughable sighs and playing with each other of the girls was really not doing it for me and almost made me laugh on a couple of occasions. Shannon does however ride pretty hard and as she slapped up and down on my cock it was enough to make me cum. With expended shells removed, we sat on the bed and chatted while we caught our breath. Shannon is a lovely girl but she is a proper 'bird' - really strikes me if you're looking for someone for a dirty feel up out the back of the pub on a Saturday night she'd be your girl.. Some of the conversation was a bit awkward and I realised our time was running by and I wanted another go, so i suggest we all do some mutual masturbation and see where it led. Now bear in mind at this point we've be messing around and Shannon got fucked already, the girl still has her bra firmly on and was half-heartedly playing with her clit as she lay there, I asked her to get he boobs out as let me have a look!  :angry: More pretty soulless fingering by both girls ensured - give her her due, Hannah did try and was losing a finger inside of her (which helped get me up again) but nothing like I've experienced with other girls from experience.

Shannon put a mac on me and gave some further OW plus some vigourous HJ action while I sucked her tits and kissed Hannah on and off, but again however much I tried to get the girls involved they seemed detached. It ended up with both girls on their backs with me getting my dick between them and giving myself a good wank alternating over them. Ended up cumming over Hannah's tits and tummy but it really did feel like I was doing it for the sake of it.

Cleaned up and offered a shower, which I took. When I came back to the room, the girls were chatting and planning on what they were going to watch on TV etc. I got dressed, made polite talk, and left.


Conclusion: I was hoping to rekindle a few occasions when my university gf, one of her housemates and I got drunk and had a threesome (which was bloody brilliant) but this experience was nothing like that. Maybe Hannah/Shannon and I just didn't click as people and there was no chemistry, but I feel they didn't try to get the mood going or interact with me enthusiastically (or with each other for that matter). For the money paid, I really can't recommend these two girls for a duo experience. HannahBanks gets some good reviews, so maybe on her own she can shine a bit more? Shannon is a well endowed girl and for some guys you'll probably empty your sacs and wallets for her, but for me she was too fake. For me, a threesome should be exploring each other opportunistically, having some fun as you gang up together on the other person and drive them wild, and end up all in a bit of a sticky, hot mess. This punt left me cold, frustrated and has put me off threesomes for a while!

Offline Students Notebook



Ahem, cough, cough.

Oh dear  :lol:

S.N.

Davido0007

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Had similar experience with Hannah in a duo. She just seems lazy and uninterested. Although the other lady was great in my case.

Offline JetSetWilly

HannahBanks gets some good reviews, so maybe on her own she can shine a bit more?

She sure does - particularly slagging off her regulars, some of her duo partners, even her own family. She even once boasted to me how she plans to rinse one of her millionaire clients.

Integrity isn't her strong point. Which is not surprising considering her criminal record.

Offline socks

She sure does - particularly slagging off her regulars, some of her duo partners, even her own family. She even once boasted to me how she plans to rinse one of her millionaire clients.

Integrity isn't her strong point. Which is not surprising considering her criminal record.
That's a big set of claims for you to come out of the wilderness to make, that I've never heard before. I'll bite, tell us more...

Offline JetSetWilly

That's a big set of claims for you to come out of the wilderness to make, that I've never heard before. I'll bite, tell us more...

Well for starters, she said one client who sees her very frequently for the last few years who likes "cuddles" is "really annoying". She boasted she managed to get a Land Rover out of a millionaire client, before she dumped him claiming he was a "control freak", but afaik, went back for seconds.

She said Catherine G is "stuck-up" after they went to a "posh restaurant" in Chelmsford a couple of months ago. Although I think she's aggrieved with her because it transpired one of CG's clients is a close relative of Hannah's. She asked me "how do I get out of a holiday" she had regrettably booked with a 'friend' from Norwich after they fell out.

Her criminal record is for her part in smuggling a bottle of vodka and Heroin into a prison.

She may seem quite shy and sweet at first, but once you get to know her she's quite the wildcat.

Robbiebucks

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Well for starters, she said one client who sees her very frequently for the last few years who likes "cuddles" is "really annoying". She boasted she managed to get a Land Rover out of a millionaire client, before she dumped him claiming he was a "control freak", but afaik, went back for seconds.

She said Catherine G is "stuck-up" after they went to a "posh restaurant" in Chelmsford a couple of months ago. Although I think she's aggrieved with her because it transpired one of CG's clients is a close relative of Hannah's. She asked me "how do I get out of a holiday" she had regrettably booked with a 'friend' from Norwich after they fell out.

Her criminal record is for her part in smuggling a bottle of vodka and Heroin into a prison.

She may seem quite shy and sweet at first, but once you get to know her she's quite the wildcat.

Don’t hold back there ...

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Well for starters, she said one client who sees her very frequently for the last few years who likes "cuddles" is "really annoying". She boasted she managed to get a Land Rover out of a millionaire client, before she dumped him claiming he was a "control freak", but afaik, went back for seconds.

She said Catherine G is "stuck-up" after they went to a "posh restaurant" in Chelmsford a couple of months ago. Although I think she's aggrieved with her because it transpired one of CG's clients is a close relative of Hannah's. She asked me "how do I get out of a holiday" she had regrettably booked with a 'friend' from Norwich after they fell out.

Her criminal record is for her part in smuggling a bottle of vodka and Heroin into a prison.

She may seem quite shy and sweet at first, but once you get to know her she's quite the wildcat.

JackJack has a problem with your post, but he / she doesn't even have the decency to post, so probably doesn't really care  :thumbsdown:

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
Well for starters, she said one client who sees her very frequently for the last few years who likes "cuddles" is "really annoying". She boasted she managed to get a Land Rover out of a millionaire client, before she dumped him claiming he was a "control freak", but afaik, went back for seconds.

She said Catherine G is "stuck-up" after they went to a "posh restaurant" in Chelmsford a couple of months ago. Although I think she's aggrieved with her because it transpired one of CG's clients is a close relative of Hannah's. She asked me "how do I get out of a holiday" she had regrettably booked with a 'friend' from Norwich after they fell out.

Her criminal record is for her part in smuggling a bottle of vodka and Heroin into a prison.

She may seem quite shy and sweet at first, but once you get to know her she's quite the wildcat.

She sounds a right exciting puddle of poop to unfortunately book. Do you have a review?

Shannon summers

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Hi, please may we politely request that clients refrain from divulging personal information that maybe exchanged between both parties during a meet and posting regardless if it be fact or fiction,
Regards Shannon x

Offline JetSetWilly

Don’t hold back there ...

Ironically, I'm holding back quite a bit thus far!

JackJack has a problem with your post, but he / she doesn't even have the decency to post, so probably doesn't really care  :thumbsdown:

That's a shame. JackJack should perhaps consider the only loyalty Hannah will ever show will be to the highest bidder...to the point she'll even leave her heavily-pregnant 'best friend' in the lurch.

She sounds a right exciting puddle of poop to unfortunately book. Do you have a review?

I can provide a review dear Sir.  If you wouldn't mind waiting a couple of days, I'd like to see if Hannah is willing to resolve an issue that has left me minus £260 worth of electronic equipment first.

Offline finn5555

English Kat is crying to admin calling it slander  :wackogirl:

Offline JetSetWilly

English Kat is crying to admin calling it slander  :wackogirl:

Is that the same EnglishKat that Hannah used to complain "lets her down"?

I liked Kat - she's seemed sound.

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
English Kat is crying to admin calling it slander 

Lots of pro$$ies seem upset at this thread  :unknown:

Davido0007

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
As much as this 'gossip' is interesting, is it really relevant to escorting?

We have no idea if this is fact or fiction. No evidence has been provided and I don't think any irrefutable proof is coming. And even if it did, not sure how this is particularly useful.

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Well for starters, she said one client who sees her very frequently for the last few years who likes "cuddles" is "really annoying". She boasted she managed to get a Land Rover out of a millionaire client, before she dumped him claiming he was a "control freak", but afaik, went back for seconds.

She said Catherine G is "stuck-up" after they went to a "posh restaurant" in Chelmsford a couple of months ago. Although I think she's aggrieved with her because it transpired one of CG's clients is a close relative of Hannah's. She asked me "how do I get out of a holiday" she had regrettably booked with a 'friend' from Norwich after they fell out.

Her criminal record is for her part in smuggling a bottle of vodka and Heroin into a prison.

She may seem quite shy and sweet at first, but once you get to know her she's quite the wildcat.

Shannon is now reporting your post  :wacko:

Offline JetSetWilly

Hi, please may we politely request that clients refrain from divulging personal information that maybe exchanged between both parties during a meet and posting regardless if it be fact or fiction,
Regards Shannon x

Hey Shannon, the problem with that is Hannah ignored my "polite request" regarding the return/reimbursement of my electronic items in the first place. If she hadn't, I probably wouldn't be here. She only has herself to blame for this escalation - I did initially attempt to resolve things amicably. And if service providers refrained from divulging personal information about their colleagues and other clients to clients, there would be nothing to divulge. It's really that simple.

I doubt Hannah would want to go down the road of proving "facts" via posting links to news articles regarding her criminal conviction or other screenshots exemplifying her lack of integrity, discretion and willingness to throw her 'friends' under a bus. I can do if you wish? - Just to clarify the distinction between fact/fiction and truth/libel (slander is spoken btw).

If you have anything specific you claim is "fiction", please let me know and I'll attempt to clarify.

x

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Hi, please may we politely request that clients refrain from divulging personal information that maybe exchanged between both parties during a meet and posting regardless if it be fact or fiction,
Regards Shannon x

why would you tell private info to clients, that a bit retarded isn't it?

this is a warning to those that love to tell the truth on punts. 

Offline socks

Well for starters, she said one client who sees her very frequently for the last few years who likes "cuddles" is "really annoying". She boasted she managed to get a Land Rover out of a millionaire client, before she dumped him claiming he was a "control freak", but afaik, went back for seconds.

She said Catherine G is "stuck-up" after they went to a "posh restaurant" in Chelmsford a couple of months ago. Although I think she's aggrieved with her because it transpired one of CG's clients is a close relative of Hannah's. She asked me "how do I get out of a holiday" she had regrettably booked with a 'friend' from Norwich after they fell out.

Her criminal record is for her part in smuggling a bottle of vodka and Heroin into a prison.

She may seem quite shy and sweet at first, but once you get to know her she's quite the wildcat.

So you've known all this for ages I presume, been a member here for nearly three years, yet only now decide to let us know? In the meantime many of us have had times when we've spent our hard earned on this girl, when you are essentially alleging that she's a big risk.

Thanks for fuck all for either a pile of bullshit, or for displaying a similar lack of comradery to your fellow punters that you've berated Hannah for having to her fellow WGs and cuntstruck customers.

Offline Rock123

Hey Shannon, the problem with that is Hannah ignored my "polite request" regarding the return/reimbursement of my electronic items in the first place. If she hadn't, I probably wouldn't be here. She only has herself to blame for this escalation - I did initially attempt to resolve things amicably. And if service providers refrained from divulging personal information about their colleagues and other clients to clients, there would be nothing to divulge. It's really that simple.

I doubt Hannah would want to go down the road of proving "facts" via posting links to news articles regarding her criminal conviction or other screenshots exemplifying her lack of integrity, discretion and willingness to throw her 'friends' under a bus. I can do if you wish? - Just to clarify the distinction between fact/fiction and truth/libel (slander is spoken btw).

If you have anything specific you claim is "fiction", please let me know and I'll attempt to clarify.

x

I was thinking of booking Hannah so if there is anything untoward you should tell as I don't want to book if I think I have to be even more guarded.

Offline JetSetWilly

So you've known all this for ages I presume,

Nope. Most stuff a few months. The non-return of my equipment has been this week.

been a member here for nearly three years, yet only now decide to let us know?

I can't really fix that unless you've got a spare DeLorean and know of a stretch on the A14 that doesn't have speed cameras or lorries overtaking each other.

In the meantime many of us have had times when we've spent our hard earned on this girl, when you are essentially alleging that she's a big risk.

A big risk of getting a metaphorical knife in the back, yes - I got mine towards the end of September.

Thanks for fuck all for either a pile of bullshit, or for displaying a similar lack of comradery to your fellow punters that you've berated Hannah for having to her fellow WGs and cuntstruck customers.

Thank you for your input. Long live Malcolm Tucker.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Nope. Most stuff a few months. The non-return of my equipment has been this week.

I can't really fix that unless you've got a spare DeLorean and know of a stretch on the A14 that doesn't have speed cameras or lorries overtaking each other.

A big risk of getting a metaphorical knife in the back, yes - I got mine towards the end of September.

Thank you for your input. Long live Malcolm Tucker.

Are you a jilted lover out of interest?

Dos she know Annabella crimizon?  Do you?

Offline Batfink

Wow this thread turned hostile in a hurry... why the hell is it so compĺicated? You book a girl you pay you fuck you leave. Why the soap opera?

Offline JetSetWilly

I was thinking of booking Hannah so if there is anything untoward you should tell as I don't want to book if I think I have to be even more guarded.

As a one-off, you'd probably be safe from anything untoward - it's when she starts with the "You're more than just a client" bullshit and her loose lips upstairs start moving when the problems start. She really despises most of her clients. And don't expect much enthusiasm unless you pretend to work for Goldman Sachs. Otherwise, you might be better off buying a mannequin, slapping a photo of Holly Valance with a hangover on it, and saving yourself a few quid.

Are you a jilted lover out of interest?
Dos she know Annabella crimizon?  Do you?

More of a jilted "friend" on the orders of her pimp.

Who the fuck is Annabella Crimson?

Offline socks

Nope. Most stuff a few months. The non-return of my equipment has been this week.

I can't really fix that unless you've got a spare DeLorean and know of a stretch on the A14 that doesn't have speed cameras or lorries overtaking each other.

A big risk of getting a metaphorical knife in the back, yes - I got mine towards the end of September.

Thank you for your input. Long live Malcolm Tucker.
You see if this were genuine or indeed no more to it than meets the eye, I think you'd be a little more conciliatory. This board is blighted by one post wonders who talk shit for reasons known to themselves. You pop up out of nowhere with big news and have to expect a level of scepticism that is allayed by the nature and credibility of your response. Smart arse answers like you've given, don't help, rather they reduce the likelihood of you being seen as anything other than a troll.

Offline JetSetWilly

You see if this were genuine or indeed no more to it than meets the eye, I think you'd be a little more conciliatory. This board is blighted by one post wonders who talk shit for reasons known to themselves. You pop up out of nowhere with big news and have to expect a level of scepticism that is allayed by the nature and credibility of your response. Smart arse answers like you've given, don't help, rather they reduce the likelihood of you being seen as anything other than a troll.

I was being "conciliatory" - what sort of reply did you expect? You didn't really give me much to go on.  As I posted to Shannon, if there's anything *specific* you believe is bullshit, I'm more than happy to clarify, provide evidence, or suggest you contact relevant parties to verify.

It comes across you're more concerned about the harsh truth, rather than the potential for my claims to be bullshit, and hope that I just "disappear".

I take your point about "credibility" and "one post wonders" though. I can't seem to post DMs and I'd rather not post the links/evidence directly, as that would "out" Hannah - I'm not that vindictive. Unlike her pimp who outed her profession to a close family member of hers back in June. What I can do is report my own posts and submit the evidence.

Fair?

Ok, let's start with: "Hannah" has a criminal record for her part in smuggling a bottle of vodka and some Heroin into a prison

Offline Students Notebook

Message to JetSetWilly.

I was going to keep out of this but I am fascinated to know more about the "Electronic Equipment" you speak of.

Would you tell us what it is ?? Please.

S.N.




Offline cueball

Willy.... you're using the post report function to reply on this thread... i think  :unknown:

Your reports look like replies, take your time and use the quote button instead of the report button

Offline Students Notebook

Willy.... you're using the post report function to reply on this thread... i think  :unknown:

Your reports look like replies, take your time and use the quote button instead of the report button

No. I think he reported his posts on purpose.

QUOTE.  "What I can do is report my own posts and submit the evidence."

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=170708.msg1825197#msg1825197
« Last Edit: November 23, 2017, 01:06:39 pm by Students Notebook »

Robbiebucks

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Willy.... you're using the post report function to reply on this thread... i think  :unknown:

Your reports look like replies, take your time and use the quote button instead of the report button

See what mood admin is in today.... countdown to banning  :lol: “frivolous spamming of admin with post reports”?  :lol:  :bomb: :bomb: :bomb:


Are you a jilted lover out of interest?
Exactly what I thought...  :wacko:

Offline cueball

No. I think he reported his posts on purpose.

QUOTE.  "What I can do is report my own posts and submit the evidence."

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=170708.msg1825197#msg1825197

Fair enough, the post reports read odd don't they  :unknown: they had me thinking they were evidential replies

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I went to take a look at who this Hannah is and it looks like her AW profile has been pulled.  :unknown:

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I went to take a look at who this Hannah is and it looks like her AW profile has been pulled.  :unknown:

But then I checked JetSetWilly's post reports and it's all there!!  :scare:

Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
The instagram account he linked was open yesterday - it's private today.............

So you'll be posting a review of Hannah (?) soon if you don't get your "electronic equipment" back Willy ?

I'm guessing that was a thinly veiled threat to add leverage ?  :unknown:

Best of luck  :hi:



Offline Students Notebook

.

Well JetSetWilly has gone quiet.

He posted this and then thought better of it, went back to modify it and removed all the words. Now it's just an empty post.

Perhaps he  got his electrical equipment back and it had been tampered with  :scare:  :lol: :lol: :lol:

S.N.

Offline madeinwales56

Maybe one of the prossies in question have got an ex jail bird to go around and have a word with him.

Offline Students Notebook

Maybe one of the prossies in question have got an ex jail bird to go around and have a word with him.



I was wondering that too. :cool: :hi: :bomb:

Electrical equipment ------- nasty stuff.

Hope it was PAT tested.

S.N.

Offline bigpoppapomp

But then I checked JetSetWilly's post reports and it's all there!!  :scare:

Anything you can shed light on, don't want to strike a hottie like Hannah off the list for no good reason

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Anything you can shed light on, don't want to strike a hottie like Hannah off the list for no good reason

It's all in the Post Reports section, 23rd Nov 9:04am onwards.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?board=35.0

I don't suppose JSW realised his reports would be publicly available. I hope his electrical equipment has been duly returned, though it's probably in 1000 pieces now!   :unknown:

Not a lot to be concerned about from a punter perspective. The criminality was 5 years ago and just betrayed a willingness to do something others wouldn't for cash, which is generally an admirable quality in prossies.

Let's hope she returns to the biz after this little episode. From her reviews she appears to be a decent provider.

Just do the cash for services thing, don't go getting involved in their lives and lending them electrical equipment!!   :wacko:
« Last Edit: November 25, 2017, 12:24:36 pm by vt »

Offline Eeyore

I must admit this Board has been of assistance to me and hopefully I have contributed to help others in some way.

However when you read threads like this it really doesn't help !
I have always wanted to book Shannon but our diaries have yet to match but doubt has entered my mind when reading this thread although it seems the author of the criticism is cast in doubt regards to authenticity.

I suppose we sometimes have to be wary of contributors to this website especially if they appear to have another agenda.

rganz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Quote: "Unlike her pimp who outed her profession to a close family member of hers back in June."
"More of a jilted "friend" on the orders of her pimp."

I thought HB was independent. I'm alarmed at the suggestion that there is a pimp involved. JSW can you please clarify or pm me?
« Last Edit: March 09, 2018, 06:10:12 pm by rganz »

Offline finn5555

Quote: "Unlike her pimp who outed her profession to a close family member of hers back in June."
"More of a jilted "friend" on the orders of her pimp."

I thought HB was independent. I'm alarmed at the suggestion that there is a pimp involved. JSW can you please clarify or pm me?

why you resurrecting an old post  :unknown:

Troll......