All reviews need to have location written in the heading and that's a rule set in UKP stone that must be adhered to.
Members like Sinz The Don & Roth play there part adding locations & Indexing. Hope that explains it 
It explains but doesn't justify it IMO. For a start not all review titles have a location, so its clearly not "a rule set in UKP stone that must be adhered to" - currently the top review in the Wales section (
Ananya - Thai Massage) does not have a location. When I originally noticed the title change only 6 of the top 10 reviews for Wales (including this amended review) had a location in their titles and the regular reviews of Portfolio girls often do not have a location included in their titles.
Also, the booking in question happened to be in Port Talbot this time - the girls do trio and duo bookings in various locations in Wales (and occasionaly beyond). The fact that it was in the Wales section obviously implied a location.
What really irritates me is that
some members can edit, apparently on an abitrary and subjective basis, the review of another member who took time to write, re-read and review it. Had someone posted and asked me to include a location in the title next time I would have noted it and followed the advice.
All in all it has me question whether I should bother to take the time to write reviews.