Author Topic: deina Birmingham excellent service TOFTT (Read 5566 times)

pbrown355 · « **on:** May 21, 2017, 11:15:08 pm »

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Wanted to try a new girl, like anal from time to time so rang Deina. Nothing on here but sounded pleasant and friendly on the phone. Straightforward instructions to Ryland Street area. Entered, hidden behind door as usual. Pleasant surprise, looks better than photos facially. Figure as photos, larger in the hips, smallish breasts. I usually look for those size 6-8s with boobs but still thought she looked good. Friendly, offered drink, exchanged money, £60 for 30mins. Had double checked on phone that anal was included.
Nice apartment, looks like one room with bathroom but room a good size.
Undressed, she sends me to the bed and tells me to lie on my back, asks if I like kissing so I say yes. She starts kissing, but before it gets too involved she begins moving down my body, slowly kissing all the way. Once she reaches my cock she tells me to turn over to try something.
Over I go and there follows a serious amount of time having my ass played with, outside and inside (with a covered finger) and my cock and balls massaged amazingly. This went on for ages. She then told me to turn back over and repeated the process while I was on my back. As I am one pop only I eventually stopped her to have a short amount of sex in doggy to finish. However, she remembered I had asked for anal (by now I was past caring. Not even sure why I stopped the massaging) so put it in her ass.
I came in about 20 seconds.
This was the best time I have had with a girl for a long time. Somewhere in the middle of this was brief oral with. She does without.
Will be returning as soon as I can find time. May stay an hour which is unusual for me. I was also there for well over the 30mins.
For a girl who has a wide range of services and seems to enjoy what she is doing you could not do better.
With all the talk on here about the lack of new talent, she is well worth a visit.

Ming · « **Reply #1 on:** May 22, 2017, 12:07:02 am »

She was clearly advertising bareback / unprotected sex up until a week ago, she also had it on her previous profile, I suspect this is why her feedback is hidden?

Ming

pbrown355 · « **Reply #2 on:** May 22, 2017, 07:26:20 pm »

When I was with her there was no indication at all of bareback being on offer. I had checked on her site that it wasn't. I'd like to think, not just for my own sake, that this was more to do with lack of correctly ticking her boxes than actually offering it.
Thanks for pointing this out. I now need to take a brief break and visit the clinic before punting.

Ming · « **Reply #3 on:** May 22, 2017, 08:51:00 pm »

Quote from: pbrown355 on May 22, 2017, 07:26:20 pm

When I was with her there was no indication at all of bareback being on offer. I had checked on her site that it wasn't. I'd like to think, not just for my own sake, that this was more to do with lack of correctly ticking her boxes than actually offering it.
Thanks for pointing this out. I now need to take a brief break and visit the clinic before punting.

A wise precaution pbrown.

You could be forgiven for thinking it was just a mis-checked box, but it was on both the profiles, of that I am quite certain, to make that mistake twice..... I have my doubts.

Ming

pbrown355 · « **Reply #4 on:** May 23, 2017, 09:11:13 pm »

If I interpret your message correctly it's a bit harsh. I looked at a profile, it didn't say anything about bareback. I booked. I reviewed. You were good enough to point out the bareback issue for which I thanked you and will behave appropriately.
Now it's a mistake and you doubt something about my behaviour. Not what I was expecting.
I don't do bareback. I don't book profiles which include bareback. Can make a mistake the same as the next person but not reading a profile before it gets changed is not something I should be criticised for in my opinion.
Apologies in advance if I am being too precious.

Ming · « **Reply #5 on:** May 23, 2017, 10:32:45 pm »

To be clear, my message was in reference to you saying

" I'd like to think, not just for my own sake, that this was more to do with lack of correctly ticking her boxes than actually offering it."

Which I took as a reference to HER, randomly checking boxes.

It was not an attack on your character or judgement, it is a mistake anyone could make if they had not seen the amended and previous profile.

For the avoidance of doubt, my criticism is of HER not you.

Ming

pbrown355 · « **Reply #6 on:** May 24, 2017, 10:49:11 pm »

Ok thanks for putting that straight. You are probably right. If it was in VS site it would have to be in the text because there isn't a box for it. In that case it can't be a mistake. Shame because I now obviously won't be going back and I had such a good time. Oh well.

Pdiddy2017 · « **Reply #7 on:** June 17, 2017, 11:27:48 am »

pbrown355 - thinking of going to see this one tonight, can I just check the current pictures on her profile is the WG you saw, I don't want to B&S.
Thanks

pbrown355 · « **Reply #8 on:** June 17, 2017, 08:09:38 pm »

Hope this isn't too late but yes that's her. You should note Ming's comments about BB.

sln · « **Reply #9 on:** June 18, 2017, 05:13:31 pm »

What a strange experience with this fit young lady .
I had. The same as the OP .
If I go back I will skip the massage from the back and spend
More time on front , doggy and anal.
After 20 mins she did say my time was up and would I like
To pay for another half hour , I declined and insisted we finished off
With the anal , i shower afterwards and was back on the road in the 30 mins .
A nice girl but she just tried it on , don't stand for it .

Wolverhampton1990 · « **Reply #10 on:** June 20, 2017, 07:10:59 pm »

I'm not sure the girl in the new pictures are the same girl, and she has blurred the face. Looks more like your typical bait and switch profile now.

Ming · « **Reply #11 on:** June 20, 2017, 08:03:57 pm »

Quote from: sln on June 18, 2017, 05:13:31 pm

What a strange experience with this fit young lady .
I had. The same as the OP .
If I go back I will skip the massage from the back and spend
More time on front , doggy and anal.
After 20 mins she did say my time was up and would I like
To pay for another half hour , I declined and insisted we finished off
With the anal , i shower afterwards and was back on the road in the 30 mins .
A nice girl but she just tried it on , don't stand for it .

So you knowingly went with a girl who has been barebacking?

Ming

Ming · « **Reply #12 on:** June 20, 2017, 08:04:53 pm »

Quote from: Wolverhampton1990 on June 20, 2017, 07:10:59 pm

I'm not sure the girl in the new pictures are the same girl, and she has blurred the face. Looks more like your typical bait and switch profile now.

Well spotted, the profile has swapped twice in the last 10 days or so.

Dodgy......

Ming

sln · « **Reply #13 on:** June 21, 2017, 01:17:27 am »

I don't that she does bareback ,
Was not on offer and I would not have taken it .
Not on her profile .
She is a fit young lady and gives a good service .
Offered drink on arrival , beer , wine , opted for cola as it was a morning meet .
She is a cut above many Romanian punts as the OP stated.
I would say she is up with some of the best , "
I will probably return and not be put off by some of the very negative post
That this forum seems to thrive on .

Ming · « **Reply #14 on:** June 21, 2017, 07:48:09 am »

Quote from: sln on June 21, 2017, 01:17:27 am

I don't that she does bareback ,
Was not on offer and I would not have taken it .
Not on her profile .
She is a fit young lady and gives a good service .
Offered drink on arrival , beer , wine , opted for cola as it was a morning meet .
She is a cut above many Romanian punts as the OP stated.
I would say she is up with some of the best , "
I will probably return and not be put off by some of the very negative post
That this forum seems to thrive on .

Up to you sin, but it is a FACT she was offering bareback, you obviously don't care about the risk of engaging the services of someone who would do such a thing

Ming

x69x · « **Reply #15 on:** June 21, 2017, 11:46:12 am »

Quote from: Ming on June 21, 2017, 07:48:09 am

Up to you sin, but it is a FACT she was offering bareback, you obviously don't care about the risk of engaging the services of someone who would do such a thing

Ming

How many girls working ones or otherwise do not go bare at some point? I would say very few or most likely none at all.
Even working girls have boyfriends and a social life outside of their job, go on holidays looking for fun, and some will have favourite regular customers. Also condoms can and do break or leak.
I agree it is right to avoid girls that offer this service as a norm, but also think it deluded that because a WG doesn't advertise BB, that she doesn't ever do it.
I forget names and details, it was a long time ago, but a very attractive girl who worked from her flat near Traffic St in Derby I booked through AW, not only had the unchecked box actually stated BB was never an option. We did get on very well, after the second visit to her having spent about an additional 20 min's chatting she suggested we continued our chat over a couple of drinks as I was her last for the day. I took up the offer walked to The Brunswick near the station, I bought first, she insisted on buying second, walked her home, got in my car and went home thinking nothing more than she was a very pleasant girl.
A couple of weeks later I went to see her again, and without mention of such from me, was given the option of not using a condom. Do you think I was the only customer she had ever done that with? I would almost certainly say not.
How can you be sure on your next punt what the girl was doing 30 minutes previously? Regardless of what is on her profile.