Author Topic: Just Amelia - Earl's Court  (Read 2227 times)


30 review(s) for Just_Amelia (22 positive, 5 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by pumps]

Offline Gandalfthewhite

External Link/Members Only

Met her recently, exceptionally good GFE. Very attractive/sexy more than conventionally stunning. Size 8, tall, sparkling/mischievous eyes, pert tits with responsive nipples, smiling throughout, full on DFK, a really fun and terrifically enjoyable experience. Pictures quite accurate.

Like a previous reviewer, was planning to only do half an hour (had an energetic punt the previous day as well) but decided on an hour within minutes of meeting her since she was very engaging from the first minute even though it was a first meeting.

Lots of snogging and oral both ways on the living room couch, before moving into the bedroom for slow-paced missionary and doggy for round 1, followed by reverse O and then missionary banging as if my life depended on it in round 2. Came both times in the condom.

Very nice flat in Earl's Court as well, always sets the right tone if the girl is not staying in some complete shithole. Clean and spacious bathroom for post-session shower.

Higher rates than in historical reviews (I paid £150 for the hour). No clockwatching.

Strong recommend, particularly for those who like a passionate GFE (I do), another positive Polish experience. No obvious negatives, though not for those looking for a Russian supermodel / conventionally killer body.

PS: Thanks to Pumps for the insults, since he had a point - I don't post direct reviews (though try to contribute as often as I can on threads to provide backing opinions) and should more often:-)
« Last Edit: March 02, 2017, 03:23:24 pm by Gandalfthewhite »

Offline pumps

Better to post your own positive reviews.  :thumbsup:

especially if you want to help other punters in a meaningful way (and your fav prossies  :sarcastic:)


PS: Thanks to Pumps for the insults, since he had a point - I don't post direct reviews (though try to contribute as often as I can on threads to provide backing opinions) and should more often:-)


but as long as you see where you went wrong though on the other thread? It could be seen as trying to discredit that punters negative experience, that's something white knights, fluffys tend to do.
I'm sure it was innocent.

 :hi: