slutt xxx -Raluka - Southampton

[Heath01]

Two punts so far, both positive.

Raluka is at External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Logistics: booking and communication both good, quick response

Location (for In-call): Bit of a grotty area but far from the worst. Inside, mediocre but acceptable

Looks: Body terrific, tall and slender. Face quite good. Photos very accurate. Late 20s maybe. Clean and smelt good. Met me in a tarty one-piece but that's probably what most people like.

Language: Very good non-native English

Services used: OW, CIM (£100 ph standard, CIM £20 extra)

Enthusiasm attitude and time keeping: All very good. Nicely escorted to and from room.

[Jamboney]

When did you see her? For a while she was probably one of the best WG's in Southampton but suffered a dramatic drop in the quality of her service.

[nigel4498]

Where and when was this punt?
She is now  listed in Aberdeen but has probably parked there until she returns although she did log on her Profile and wasn't accessing from Romania.
Odd that she has changed her name.

[Cunning Punt]

Where and when was this punt?
She is now  listed in Aberdeen but has probably parked there until she returns although she did log on her Profile and wasn't accessing from Romania.
Odd that she has changed her name.

Indeed. Going on her profile activity, she hasn't been working for several months. Therefore, either this is a very old review from a new member who wants to make a start on here or it's a fake review.

Maybe it isn't she that has changed her profile name but Sergei.

[Jsjs311299]

Quite a few stretch marks which she tries to hide with a red cushion, in Gallery.

[DrConners]

Where and when was this punt?
She is now  listed in Aberdeen but has probably parked there until she returns although she did log on her Profile and wasn't accessing from Romania.
Odd that she has changed her name.

+1

Heath - Where & When was your booking mate ? I've seen her (but not reviewed her) - Sorry mate I question your integrity here :

Looks: Body terrific, tall and slender. Face quite good. Photos very accurate. Late 20s maybe.

You forgot to mention the extensive scarring & stetch marks on her torso & scars on her tits from her botched surgery/implants ? Late 20's ? Nope!

I think you might have seen her - but ages ago, she parked her profile in Aberdeen to milk her private gallery months ago & hasn't been escorting since October last year. Listen mate, your off to a bad start here posting this bollocks review, I'm sure others would agree we really apprieciate fresh reviews from new members but at the very best this review is fluffy old innacurate news or at it's worst your plainly talking shit - did you remember to bring your perscription specatcles with you RX ?

I'm not UKP police (again!!) but in the future would you please be more accurate with details including if you saw a WG recently or not - otherwise it just sounds like your attempting to ingratiate yourself here without actually contributing anything of value.

Just be honest mate - it pays dividends 

[Chooser]

Well spotted DrC and nicely put. I did notice that Raluka's old sparring partner Deny was back available in Southampton earlier this week? 

[Zimbaman]

Services used: OW, CIM (£100 ph standard, CIM £20 extra)

Poor review at best. But you had OW, then CIM? How did that work? Or are you just advertising her services?

Agree with others. Bad start....

[Heath01]

Ok, several fair points. I am a newish member and new to reviewing. I tried to follow the common format and I apologise for omitting the date which I agree would have been helpful. The meeting was a while ago, October 2017 sounds about right but I'm not certain. It was around then, though.

Because she's still advertising on AW with an indication she's in Southampton I thought she'd still be working.

I also apologise for putting OW and CIM. This should have been OWO and CIM of course.

I don't apologise for describing Raluka as I found her. To do otherwise would not help any of us. You may have a different view but that doesn't make mine dishonest, any more than our difference of opinion makes you less than trustworthy.

Hope this helps.

[sunbunny]

You may have a different view but that doesn't make mine dishonest

You clearly don't understand how this forum works - if your view differs from certain contributors, you're immediately labelled either a pimp or a verminous liar?

[Zimbaman]

You clearly don't understand how this forum works - if your view differs from certain contributors, you're immediately labelled either a pimp or a verminous liar?

You not happy with the forum bunny? 

The ethos of the forum is that we appreciate honest informative reviews. We do not like fluffy reviews, misinformation, or generally posts we can’t trust.

[DrConners]

You clearly don't understand how this forum works - if your view differs from certain contributors, you're immediately labelled either a pimp or a verminous liar?

That's a bitter & jaded perspective Bunny, shame you feel that way, I read through your reviews (cheers there're very helpful) you have only received positive responses from other forum members who have interpretated your contributions as honest & accurate 

From my understanding & experience of how this forum works if a new member posts a review of a WG who hasn't been available to fuck for months, doesn't accurately & honestly describe her physical appearance (including flaws like scars for example) I wouldn't be the first to seek clarification - and I wasn't - 4 other UKP members flagged questions & concerns too.

Chin up & try to contribute posts relevant to the thread & more importanly about your experiences with the WG in question as opposed to generic whinings about what you think is wrong with UKP would be my impartial opinion. 

[DrConners]

Ok, several fair points. I am a newish member and new to reviewing. I tried to follow the common format and I apologise for omitting the date which I agree would have been helpful. The meeting was a while ago, October 2017 sounds about right but I'm not certain. It was around then, though.

Because she's still advertising on AW with an indication she's in Southampton I thought she'd still be working.

I also apologise for putting OW and CIM. This should have been OWO and CIM of course.

I don't apologise for describing Raluka as I found her. To do otherwise would not help any of us. You may have a different view but that doesn't make mine dishonest, any more than our difference of opinion makes you less than trustworthy.

Hope this helps.

You wouldn't have to apologise if you just posted honestly & accurately to begin with, not apologies necessary in that case.

Please continue to contribute - maybe just take on board some of the points myself & other members have raised & I'm sure you'll be fine RX. 

[nigel4498]

I'm sure you'll be fine RX. 

'RX' (w)8 a minute, surely not 

[vw]

You clearly don't understand how this forum works - if your view differs from certain contributors, you're immediately labelled either a pimp or a verminous liar?

What a Coward not naming those posters you don't like.   

[purple_t]

+1

Heath - Where & When was your booking mate ? I've seen her (but not reviewed her) - Sorry mate I question your integrity here.

You forgot to mention the extensive scarring & stetch marks on her torso & scars on her tits from her botched surgery/implants ? Late 20's ? Nope!

How was your experience with her? And what age do you think she is if not late 20s?

I regret not seeing her a few years ago pre-boob job when her service was supposed to have been very good, especially considering she was 100ph. The negative reviews towards the tail end of her tenure put me off seeing her should she ever return, though.

I do wonder if she'll ever come back, or if Sergei has just kept her profile active for the PG income?

[DrConners]

How was your experience with her? And what age do you think she is if not late 20s?

I regret not seeing her a few years ago pre-boob job when her service was supposed to have been very good, especially considering she was 100ph. The negative reviews towards the tail end of her tenure put me off seeing her should she ever return, though.

I actually had a good punt with her but to suggest I publish a retro-active review after criticising the OP for (IMO) doing just that would make me out to one hypocritcal 300 ft tall angry atomic powered monster wouldn't you say _t ? 

I do wonder if she'll ever come back, or if Sergei has just kept her profile active for the PG income?

I remember she told me she was 100% independant at the time & just shared the house & rent with other WG's, I doubt she'll be back & agree the profile is only active & parked for the PG. She told me she had dependants too.

Who calls a profile just "Slutt" anyway ? 

[DrConners]

'RX' (w)8 a minute, surely not 

Nice pun your Lordship 

[Zimbaman]

Nice pun your Lordship 

Best pub I’ve seen on here  although I have to disagree with both of you. I’m convinced that health and fitness is RX8 

[madmania]

'RX' (w)8 a minute, surely not 

Good one Nigel

And purple_t, slutt () is 26, one year older than her profile

[purple_t]

I actually had a good punt with her but to suggest I publish a retro-active review after criticising the OP for (IMO) doing just that would make me out to one hypocritcal 300 ft tall angry atomic powered monster wouldn't you say _t ? 

I remember she told me she was 100% independant at the time & just shared the house & rent with other WG's, I doubt she'll be back & agree the profile is only active & parked for the PG. She told me she had dependants too.

Who calls a profile just "Slutt" anyway ? 

I wasn't suggesting you write a review, there would be little point if she's definitely retired as you suspect, was just wondering how her service was on the off-chance that she does return.

Of course she told you she was independent... they pretty much all do lol, they don't want you to think they are working for a pimp. My guess would be that very few Roms are independent, ESPECIALLY when they are sharing a house with other Rom WGs.

If she is now retired and genuinely was independent, I doubt the profile would still be up. Most indies when they retire just delete AW and move on with life. There would be little point in them keeping their profile up, it could cause problems in their civvie life given the face pics, not worth it for the meagre PG income. But Sergei has nothing to lose by keeping the profile up.

Let's just say I would be very surprised if this girl has control of her own profile. If she has gone back to Romania, then it's not her logging onto the profile else it would say 'accessing from Romania'

[nigel4498]

Good one Nigel

 

[DrConners]

Let's just say I would be very surprised if this girl has control of her own profile. If she has gone back to Romania, then it's not her logging onto the profile else it would say 'accessing from Romania'

Good point, I have to agree with you there. Maybe parked until she or Sergi manages to sell it on to the next Romanian cum-guzzler.

Who knows, we'll wait & see I guess - to answer your question about my experience with her : she was attractive facially & friendly personality on first meeting her, in her 30's, light kissing, OWO was brief, was an enthusiastic fuck in serveral positions but lacked stamina in CG, took a hard pounding in mish, not the tightest vagina I've been in, stretch marks & scars were a turn off, warned me when I had five minutes left in a 45 minute booking.

I would have still given her a positive or neutral as she adhered to my requests - I wouldn't have returned & didn't - she wasn't Roxy. Punt took place in January last year. I've tried to be a brief as possible so not to seem to be hijacking OP's review.

[purple_t]

Good point, I have to agree with you there. Maybe parked until she or Sergi manages to sell it on to the next Romanian cum-guzzler.

Who knows, we'll wait & see I guess - to answer your question about my experience with her : she was attractive facially & friendly personality on first meeting her, in her 30's, light kissing, OWO was brief, was an enthusiastic fuck in serveral positions but lacked stamina in CG, took a hard pounding in mish, not the tightest vagina I've been in, stretch marks & scars were a turn off, warned me when I had five minutes left in a 45 minute booking.

I would have still given her a positive or neutral as she adhered to my requests - I wouldn't have returned & didn't - she wasn't Roxy. Punt took place in January last year. I've tried to be a brief as possible so not to seem to be hijacking OP's review.

I appreciate the info, thanks. Doubtful she'll return but will keep all this in mind just in case. Profile says 'on holiday' so I guess it's possible. The negative reviews + her meltdown on this forum put me off, but if she does return maybe she'll revert back to her former good service out of necessity to keep regulars happy.

Surprised she is her 30s as looks younger in the photos. We all know how deceptive photos can be though.