Sexual Health

[mike63]

I posted a review recently, and had a reply which made me think about this. I live by myself without a partner. In the past 15 years I was with a partner and didn't punt. I think most WG are careful about their sexual health-more than a casual pick up-I wish. Bare back sex has a bad reputation but was normal in Victorian times.Is it more dangerous than oral sex? Finger a girl and what do you do with that hand? This is a serious thought.

[The_Don]

External Link/Members Only

[tesla]

I posted a review recently, and had a reply which made me think about this. I live by myself without a partner. In the past 15 years I was with a partner and didn't punt. I think most WG are careful about their sexual health-more than a casual pick up-I wish. Bare back sex has a bad reputation but was normal in Victorian times.Is it more dangerous than oral sex? Finger a girl and what do you do with that hand? This is a serious thought.

it was normal in the 70's till AIDS came along

[mike63]

I did have unprotected sex with a girl in a massage parlour. Not planned-knew her well.Thank you Tracey -Theresa really.

[cueball]

This is a serious thought.

I did have unprotected sex with a girl in a massage parlour.

Thank you Tracey -Theresa really.

And you were doing so well

[Moresomes]

I did have unprotected sex with a girl in a massage parlour. Not planned-knew her well.Thank you Tracey -Theresa really.

Let's hope you're still thanking her after your next visit to the cock inspection unit.

[mike63]

perhaps I should have said it was 25 years ago

[Moresomes]

perhaps I should have said it was 25 years ago

Took you long enough to say thanks, didn't it?

[cueball]

perhaps I should have said it was 25 years ago

Or perhaps you should have said......

Err, err, err,,err, back peddle, back peddle, err, err, err, back peddle, back peddle, back peddle, oh, I know, it were 25 yr ago, err, yerr, that's it, 25 yr ago

 

[twwb]

perhaps I should have said it was 25 years ago

so you just thanked a girl, who probably won't know this site exists, for letting you bb her 25 years ago?

[cgmfudcm]

Bareback heterosexual sex carries a reasonably low transmission rate from female to male but the risk is real. Multiplying the odds of bareback transmission with those of condom failure and the girl being HIV+ ( and not on medication ) makes the chances extremely low, something like 2000 x 200x  1000 which equals 400,000,000. The other thing to remember is a lot of HIV+ people don't know they have it and merrily pass it on via unprotected sex so JUST WEAR A FUCKING CONDOM!!
Fingering represents zero risk of STDs. Receiving unprotected oral represents plenty of risk from numerous  STDs but not HIV. Sucking a cock has an equally high risk including a SLIGHT risk of HIV transmission to the suckER which is why It's not a great idea either...

[jawill]

Watched that prog on tv the other day about Freddie Mercury. Absolutely horrific what he went through in the final stages. While the is now treatment to delay the onset on AIDS, anyone thinking of having BB sex should watch it.

Can't recall the odds of catching HIV from BB vaginal sex but BB anal was something like 1 in 11. Anyway, antibiotic resistant gonnoreah is enough to put anyone off unprotected sex these days.

[Randy Mcknob]

Finger a girl and what do you do with that hand? This is a serious thought.

Wash it with soap and water.  This is pretty basic stuff, let me know if you need help with anything else.

[cgmfudcm]

The frequently quoted chances of female to male transmission is about 2000 to 1 per episode of unprotected sex. There's more to that number than meets the eye though because various other factors can influence the chances of infection such as how recently she became infected ( the more recent the higher the viral load and the greater chance of transmission ) Medication ( treatment leading to undetectable levels in the blood HUGELY reduces chances of infection ) Presence of another STD ( higher concentrations of white blood cells making transmission easier )
All that said the chances of catching HIV from a woman whose status is not known ARE low but far from impossible. Wearing a condom makes it so much less likely because just to be POTENTIALLY exposed it needs to break which, if it's used correctly, is pretty rare. This on top of the fact that WGs in the UK have the same percentage of HIV incidence as non-WGs means that if you wear a condom and do not have sex with any woman that you actually know is HIV+ then the chances of contracting is tiny...

[cgmfudcm]

So wear a condom!!!!

[Watts.E.Dunn]

Never mind AIDS there's a new strain of Gonorrhea out there antibiotic resistant that one.

Use an 'effin rubber;!

[cgmfudcm]

Yep, excellent point and Gonorrhoea, syphilis and herpes can all be caught from OWO in either direction, to name just a few...

[madmania]

I am scared of super aids and the associated death

[MrKeen]

So wear a condom!!!!

And don't let the excitementof the moment make you careless about using it correctly. Remember the the object is to avoid exchanging bodily fluids, not just slipping condom and thinking job done.

[king tarzan]

I am ultra careful
Last time I went full throttle with sophia lawrence
She was genuinely groaning
A few full throttle hard solid truncheon pumps then I went gentle

2 reasons

Did not want to cause her injury or discomfort
And just incase rubber John burst


I am extremely cautious