sexyrebecca11

[kebab_1414]

External Link/Members Only

much like dirkt's review, booked via text and confirmed, turned up and no reply to texts or call. Left after waiting 20 minutes. Shame.

[threechilliman]

How long before the meet did you book?

tcm

[kebab_1414]

the morning, about 3 hours before

[Al Reet]

Inexcusable and she seems reknowned for it  Well done OP for reporting it.

[cueball]

This is what puts me off trying to book her. I need to plan Manchester, I find just drive in willy nilly.

She can be as fit as you like but that's no bloody good if you can't get to the stage of knocking on the door.

She'll remain a might have been for me

[Scotpunter]

Out of my hot list she goes. I'm like cue ball and need to plan my spare time carefully as I don't have a lot of it.

[threechilliman]

Iffy comm's is the reason I haven't been back.

tcm

[threechilliman]

the morning, about 3 hours before

Bumped for a reg would be my guess. Advance bookings seem to be a no no.

tcm

[dutch]

Hi Guys

first post on here ..I has a similar experience a couple of weeks ago. drove from Bolton after securing  a booking with her only to be told she could not make it when i got to salford quays and waited nearly an hour ...not impressed won't be back

[threechilliman]

Hi Guys

first post on here ..I has a similar experience a couple of weeks ago. drove from Bolton after securing  a booking with her only to be told she could not make it when i got to salford quays and waited nearly an hour ...not impressed won't be back

I wonder how many others have had a similar experience?

tcm

[cueball]

I wonder how many others have had a similar experience?

tcm

I'd guess a lot, they just choose to keep it to themselves and not share it 

Fit as she might be, I just can't be arsed with being dangled and fucked about. She's in the bin.

[toomanysecrets]

I must say I arranged a meet with her via email once and then comms turned out to be impossible! I didn't get as far as being in the car park waiting outside, it just seemed that it was going to go nowhere.

I'm sure the reality is that she is simply snowed under with messages and is too disorganised to handle it. That's probably why that Sienna Kink invests in someone to essentially manage her.

I would still see her, she has been on my wishlist for some time, I just never get round to punting nowadays. I'd rather have someone who is gorgeous, gives it her best shot every time, has tonnes of positive reviews, everyone who meets her speaks highly of her, but is disorganised...than the opposite.

[Carpy]

If you have had a confirmed booking and she has fucked you about get it up as a negative review.

Hopefully they will get noted and she changes, if not a warning to all other future punters

[toomanysecrets]

If you have had a confirmed booking and she has fucked you about get it up as a negative review.

Hopefully they will get noted and she changes, if not a warning to all other future punters

This was years ago! I think by now it's quite clear that she's great looking (can't personally comment as I haven't met her), a good punt (ditto), but not great at comms. If you need to confirm this, just look her up on here.

I did some investigation on this matter, and I saw the guy who runs another forum that is unmentionable say that she is constantly being messaged, texted, etc, all the time. She probably has too many balls to juggle and can't handle it, so she's probably not going to get any better. You just have to take your chances that's why it's called punting.

[Gordon Bennett]

? Being busy or inundated does not justify taking and accepting a booking and then leaving the punter high and dry..... To me, that sort of shitbag behaviour is about as bad as it can get - especially when it's clearly wilful and consciously done.

[cueball]

? Being busy or inundated does not justify taking and accepting a booking and then leaving the punter high and dry..... To me, that sort of shitbag behaviour is about as bad as it can get - especially when it's clearly wilful and consciously done.

+1

How hard is it to buy a two quid diary and plan the day. It's not rocket science.

Plenty of other great looking lasses that offer a grand punt manage to deliver a reliable service.

No excuses.

[Puntybollocks]

I actually managed to get to see her a couple of years ago but only just. When I rang her outside her apartment block she asked me several questions about myself including the district where I live. When I got in there she told me she'd been looking at me from her window and I reminded her of someone she knew so she had to make sure I wasn't him.
She's a nice looking girl but the meeting was a bit underwhelming. There's great looking women out there who put a lot more into it, Sienna Kink for instance.
Also Rebecca ignored my polite emails asking her to leave AW feedback for me, despite me leaving positive feedback for her. For these reasons, I wouldn't return.

[Al Reet]

+1

How hard is it to buy a two quid diary and plan the day. It's not rocket science.

Plenty of other great looking lasses that offer a grand punt manage to deliver a reliable service.

No excuses.

I can even accept a wg getting her diary or bookings mixed up providing she at least has the decency to let me know first. Total silence while sitting in the car waiting outside pisses me right off. No need for it at all.

[cueball]

If truth be known there should be more negative reviews on here of this lass regarding her reliability.

Shame on the soppy wet fuckers that think it's acceptable to be pissed about 

[kebab_1414]

Maybe she's overbooking in case of cancellations ?

[lewisjones23]

taken her off my list long ago due to daft fake orgasm noises the last time I saw her

I have always text on the day when she has had the green light showing on AW - sometimes booked up, sometimes available.

if anyone still wants to see her then id take that route but have a plan B as well

[toomanysecrets]

If truth be known there should be more negative reviews on here of this lass regarding her reliability.

Shame on the soppy wet fuckers that think it's acceptable to be pissed about 

I didn't say it was okay for people to be pissed about, I said that it is easy to ascertain that she's not the best at comms. There are already three reviews of that nature on here.

I think it's utterly stupid to encourage people to post negative reviews, as it just muddies the waters. Someone mentioned Sienna Kink in this thread and how good her service is, at least three people on here considered it lacklustre:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=5342

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=115955.0

The girl in this thread is generally rated as having an outstanding gym-toned body, but this guy reckons she needs to work out more:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=63065.0

And another girl with literally dozens of positive reviews online, generally considered gorgeous, is no good because she had a dirty sole on one of her feet:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=115955.0

I only lurk here and have posted very occasionally, and I appreciate you've got thousands of posts. But you can find someone on here moaning about virtually every WG.

I'm not saying that is the case with this review, I'm sure the OP had legitimate reasons to complain, but what is the point in encouraging people to post negative reviews? People are inclined to whinge about little things anyway, it just makes it impossible to tell who is good and who isn't any good.

Of course, everyone has the right to their opinion, but I can't see why negative reviews should be actively encouraged.

[Al Reet]

I didn't say it was okay for people to be pissed about, I said that it is easy to ascertain that she's not the best at comms. There are already three reviews of that nature on here.

I think it's utterly stupid to encourage people to post negative reviews, as it just muddies the waters. Someone mentioned Sienna Kink in this thread and how good her service is, at least three people on here considered it lacklustre:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=5342

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=115955.0

The girl in this thread is generally rated as having an outstanding gym-toned body, but this guy reckons she needs to work out more:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=63065.0

And another girl with literally dozens of positive reviews online, generally considered gorgeous, is no good because she had a dirty sole on one of her feet:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=115955.0

I only lurk here and have posted very occasionally, and I appreciate you've got thousands of posts. But you can find someone on here moaning about virtually every WG.

I'm not saying that is the case with this review, I'm sure the OP had legitimate reasons to complain, but what is the point in encouraging people to post negative reviews? People are inclined to whinge about little things anyway, it just makes it impossible to tell who is good and who isn't any good.

Of course, everyone has the right to their opinion, but I can't see why negative reviews should be actively encouraged.

The things you mention are subjective and to some extent variable - what one punter thinks is fantastic oral another might not like for example.

What isn't variable is being sat in your car or having confirmed a booking to then be greeted with silence. That is unacceptable on any level and if more punters posted a negative review when it hapoened the wg might just get the message.

Poor comms is one thing, being ignored after a booking has been accepted is another thing entirely. No one would suggest posting negative reviews for the sake of it as that devalues all reviews, but when its justified as in this case it is nothing but helpful to other punters.

Take your example of Sienna Kink - she remains on my HL despite some of the comments about her. If she had 3 negatives for leaving punters hanging on the day she'd be off the list pronto, I don't care how good she is. 

[threechilliman]

I didn't say it was okay for people to be pissed about, I said that it is easy to ascertain that she's not the best at comms. There are already three reviews of that nature on here.

I think it's utterly stupid to encourage people to post negative reviews, as it just muddies the waters. Someone mentioned Sienna Kink in this thread and how good her service is, at least three people on here considered it lacklustre:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=5342

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=115955.0

The girl in this thread is generally rated as having an outstanding gym-toned body, but this guy reckons she needs to work out more:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=63065.0

And another girl with literally dozens of positive reviews online, generally considered gorgeous, is no good because she had a dirty sole on one of her feet:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=115955.0

I only lurk here and have posted very occasionally, and I appreciate you've got thousands of posts. But you can find someone on here moaning about virtually every WG.

I'm not saying that is the case with this review, I'm sure the OP had legitimate reasons to complain, but what is the point in encouraging people to post negative reviews? People are inclined to whinge about little things anyway, it just makes it impossible to tell who is good and who isn't any good.

Of course, everyone has the right to their opinion, but I can't see why negative reviews should be actively encouraged.

Good afternoon Rebecca.

You're a great punt, but your Comms is the reason I haven't returned as I like to book in advance.

tcm

[toomanysecrets]

Poor comms is one thing, being ignored after a booking has been accepted is another thing entirely. No one would suggest posting negative reviews for the sake of it as that devalues all reviews, but when its justified as in this case it is nothing but helpful to other punters.

Yes, I agree that it's unacceptable. Someone did suggest posting negative reviews for the sake of it, so you're wrong on that.

I'm just speaking as a lurker. I read reviews on here, and it's almost impossible to tell who is good and who is not. People seem to let any iota of negativity complete colour their view. So, from my perspective, I can't see why more negativity should be actively encouraged.

Take your example of Sienna Kink - she remains on my HL despite some of the comments about her. If she had 3 negatives for leaving punters hanging on the day she'd be off the list pronto, I don't care how good she is.

Whereas I would prefer someone to not turn up as this is only a waste of my time, as opposed to someone giving an unenthusiastic service and taking my money. But people on here post negative reviews all the time over the most trivial things, and it just becomes impossible to discern who is good and who is not.

I was and still am interested in seeing Rebecca. Should I pay attention to the guys who says she's great? The ones who say she's mediocre? The ones who say she has a great body? The one who thought she needed to get in the gym? The ones who say she's really enthusiastic and gives a great service? The ones who say her service was not particularly great? Fucked if I know.

[toomanysecrets]

Good afternoon Rebecca.

You're a great punt, but your Comms is the reason I haven't returned as I like to book in advance.

tcm

Yeah, obviously I'm Rebecca because she would be likely to draw attention and link to negative information about herself.

[Al Reet]

Yes, I agree that it's unacceptable. Someone did suggest posting negative reviews for the sake of it, so you're wrong on that.

I'm just speaking as a lurker. I read reviews on here, and it's almost impossible to tell who is good and who is not. People seem to let any iota of negativity complete colour their view. So, from my perspective, I can't see why more negativity should be actively encouraged.
Whereas I would prefer someone to not turn up as this is only a waste of my time, as opposed to someone giving an unenthusiastic service and taking my money. But people on here post negative reviews all the time over the most trivial things, and it just becomes impossible to discern who is good and who is not.

I was and still am interested in seeing Rebecca. Should I pay attention to the guys who says she's great? The ones who say she's mediocre? The ones who say she has a great body? The one who thought she needed to get in the gym? The ones who say she's really enthusiastic and gives a great service? The ones who say her service was not particularly great? Fucked if I know.

It's entirely your choice. The point is you have a choice based on information available from here good and bad. What use are endless streams of positive reviews with no negative comments or constructive criticisms??

I wouldn't waste my time on Rebecca no matter how good she's supposed to be, punting opportunities are limited for me and I'm not prepared to risk a no show with someone who is well known for it. If being let down at the last minute doesn't bother you, go for it. If she doesn't show at least you can't say you weren't warned. You might even have made a plan B based on what you've read here where otherwise you might not have.

Put it this way, how would you feel if you made a booking with a wg who confirmed all was ok, you turned up, only for her to go silent while you're outside?  Let's say you mention it on here and several people chime in with "yeah that happened to me" but no one bothered to mention it in the form of a review - Would you not rather have known beforehand? I know I would.

[OldAdmin]

Tick, tock.

[toomanysecrets]

Put it this way, how would you feel if you made a booking with a wg who confirmed all was ok, you turned up, only for her to go silent while you're outside?  Let's say you mention it on here and several people chime in with "yeah that happened to me" but no one bothered to mention it in the form of a review - Would you not rather have known beforehand? I know I would.

I have been let down in the past, I can't remember the precise circumstances. Obviously it's not great, this is why I tend to prefer agencies, and it does undoubtedly count against Rebecca. But I would still prefer this to handing over a load of money and getting a crap service. We're all different and we all have different circumstances; I value my money more highly than my time, but then I always have been tight!

In answer to your first question, it's very hard to know whether information contained in reviews is accurate. It's really the luck of the draw. I agree that a string of positive reviews as agencies inevitably publish isn't remotely helpful. But neither is nitpicking over minute issues, or allowing some minor thing to colour your mood (ie. someone has a slightly dirty foot!). I read the reviews here, and I just have no idea whether anyone is going to be good or not. If a WG racks up enough reviews, someone will come along and say "I've heard she was great, but I thought she was crap". It's a bit like Amazon in that respect! The difference is that this is not a £10 DVD that I can sell on Ebay.

Anyway, if I see her I will write a review and then people can judge whether I'm a fit woman with enhanced tits or an unremarkable looking middle-aged punter...

And I'm sorry if I sound like a twat, I appreciate the efforts of the people who set up this site, and I don't mean to come along and piss on your parade.

[Carpy]

Yes, I agree that it's unacceptable. Someone did suggest posting negative reviews for the sake of it, so you're wrong on that.

I'm just speaking as a lurker. I read reviews on here, and it's almost impossible to tell who is good and who is not. People seem to let any iota of negativity complete colour their view. So, from my perspective, I can't see why more negativity should be actively encouraged.
Whereas I would prefer someone to not turn up as this is only a waste of my time, as opposed to someone giving an unenthusiastic service and taking my money. But people on here post negative reviews all the time over the most trivial things, and it just becomes impossible to discern who is good and who is not.

I was and still am interested in seeing Rebecca. Should I pay attention to the guys who says she's great? The ones who say she's mediocre? The ones who say she has a great body? The one who thought she needed to get in the gym? The ones who say she's really enthusiastic and gives a great service? The ones who say her service was not particularly great? Fucked if I know.

Who suggested to post negative reports for the sake of it?

If you are referring to my post I suggest you pull your head out of Rebecca's arse and read it again. I said that if she had agreed to a booking and then fucked your about she should get a negative, I would think that is more then a reason to give a girl a negative, and I doubt I'm alone in thinking that.

[threechilliman]

From this thread:-

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=113700.0;all

I agree with you John50. Shes obviously getting a bit overwhelmed with the amout of intrest shes getting and perhaps needs a full time assistant like Sienna kink

   I thought  for a moment  you meant Sienna as her assistant. .....that sounded like fun......then I remembered Sienna has an assistant  in her flat 

And now we have this

I'm sure the reality is that she is simply snowed under with messages and is too disorganised to handle it. That's probably why that Sienna Kink invests in someone to essentially manage her.

Coincidence?

tcm

[toomanysecrets]

Coincidence?

tcm

Honestly, if it makes you happy to believe that I am Rebecca, or somehow affiliated to her, please be my guest.

You are way, way off the mark.

[MrMatrix]

Yes, I agree that it's unacceptable. Someone did suggest posting negative reviews for the sake of it, so you're wrong on that.

I'm just speaking as a lurker. I read reviews on here, and it's almost impossible to tell who is good and who is not. People seem to let any iota of negativity complete colour their view. So, from my perspective, I can't see why more negativity should be actively encouraged.
Whereas I would prefer someone to not turn up as this is only a waste of my time, as opposed to someone giving an unenthusiastic service and taking my money. But people on here post negative reviews all the time over the most trivial things, and it just becomes impossible to discern who is good and who is not.

I was and still am interested in seeing Rebecca. Should I pay attention to the guys who says she's great? The ones who say she's mediocre? The ones who say she has a great body? The one who thought she needed to get in the gym? The ones who say she's really enthusiastic and gives a great service? The ones who say her service was not particularly great? Fucked if I know.

TMS- you seem to be wandering off plot here mate. We all have different experiences with different WGs and this is a punting  forum where we can pool our information. Hopefully it would encourage quality of service as there are many SP's on this forum as lurkers. We want to enjoy our punting and not get buggered about by bad service like the OP has experienced. He is quite right in giving this person a negative. The point is we are better informed thanks to the OP and as such we can make our own minds up as to the weighting of any review. I too won't be visiting her as she's more than likely to do the same to any of us. However TMS, I'm sure you would be luckier than most, if shes reading this.

[Sh5278]

A few months ago sent AW email and got an automated message to text which I subsequently did to enquire about her availability, all I got was silence. Thankfully back then had Sandys Superstars to fall back on, but unless comms improve it's unlikely I'll attempt to arrange a booking which is unfortunate as she does seem fit. 

[cueball]

I think it's utterly stupid to encourage people to post negative reviews, as it just muddies the waters.

What an utterly stupid statement.

Ofcourse negative reviews should be encouraged, if it's an honest review then it's good to go.

Are you some kind of prossie union rep? Or just a deluded white knight who should know better after your years of so called experience?

Welcome out of the shadows by the way, I look forward to your valuable input after your years of experience...... not

[mrhappypants]

What an utterly stupid statement.

Ofcourse negative reviews should be encouraged, if it's an honest review then it's good to go.

Are you some kind of prossie union rep? Or just a deluded white knight who should know better after your years of so called experience?

Welcome out of the shadows by the way, I look forward to your valuable input after your years of experience...... not

Toomanysecrets, my constituency here is just as another fucker on this board but I have to say that your view is so far from what I know of the ethos here at UKP I think you are in the wrong place.

[smiths]

I didn't say it was okay for people to be pissed about, I said that it is easy to ascertain that she's not the best at comms. There are already three reviews of that nature on here.

I think it's utterly stupid to encourage people to post negative reviews, as it just muddies the waters. Someone mentioned Sienna Kink in this thread and how good her service is, at least three people on here considered it lacklustre:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=5342

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=115955.0

The girl in this thread is generally rated as having an outstanding gym-toned body, but this guy reckons she needs to work out more:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=63065.0

And another girl with literally dozens of positive reviews online, generally considered gorgeous, is no good because she had a dirty sole on one of her feet:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=115955.0

I only lurk here and have posted very occasionally, and I appreciate you've got thousands of posts. But you can find someone on here moaning about virtually every WG.

I'm not saying that is the case with this review, I'm sure the OP had legitimate reasons to complain, but what is the point in encouraging people to post negative reviews? People are inclined to whinge about little things anyway, it just makes it impossible to tell who is good and who isn't any good.

Of course, everyone has the right to their opinion, but I can't see why negative reviews should be actively encouraged.

This IS a genuine punters forum so encouraging punters to post negative as well as positive reviews is what posters are free to do, its none of your business what other posters do within the rules anyway.

[smiths]

I have been let down in the past, I can't remember the precise circumstances. Obviously it's not great, this is why I tend to prefer agencies, and it does undoubtedly count against Rebecca. But I would still prefer this to handing over a load of money and getting a crap service. We're all different and we all have different circumstances; I value my money more highly than my time, but then I always have been tight!

In answer to your first question, it's very hard to know whether information contained in reviews is accurate. It's really the luck of the draw. I agree that a string of positive reviews as agencies inevitably publish isn't remotely helpful. But neither is nitpicking over minute issues, or allowing some minor thing to colour your mood (ie. someone has a slightly dirty foot!). I read the reviews here, and I just have no idea whether anyone is going to be good or not. If a WG racks up enough reviews, someone will come along and say "I've heard she was great, but I thought she was crap". It's a bit like Amazon in that respect! The difference is that this is not a £10 DVD that I can sell on Ebay.

Anyway, if I see her I will write a review and then people can judge whether I'm a fit woman with enhanced tits or an unremarkable looking middle-aged punter...

And I'm sorry if I sound like a twat, I appreciate the efforts of the people who set up this site, and I don't mean to come along and piss on your parade.

What YOU class as nit picking is what some of us see as bad service, whether that be bad comms or the WG being bad at the punt. Once a WG has accepted the punters booking a review can then be done, that's the rules, if you don't agree with them I suggest you inform admin, I totally agree with them myself.

[LYL]

I've seen her earlier this year and comms were alright. Not the greatest but Meh.. Maybe she wasn't that busy then, maybe she bought that BMW she was craving at, don't know. But she might have been one of the prettiest girls I've ever touched, such a beautiful figure and a fit body.. I think I might pay her another visit soon.

[LYL]

Take your example of Sienna Kink - she remains on my HL despite some of the comments about her. If she had 3 negatives for leaving punters hanging on the day she'd be off the list pronto, I don't care how good she is.

What are the bad comments about her can you elaborate?  I'm new to the forum,  but I'd like to pay her a visit soon.

[babehunter66]

What are the bad comments about her can you elaborate?  I'm new to the forum,  but I'd like to pay her a visit soon.

ah a time machine for Xmas ...can I get one

[LYL]

ah a time machine for Xmas ...can I get one

I'm lost, what do you mean?

[Al Reet]

What are the bad comments about her can you elaborate?  I'm new to the forum,  but I'd like to pay her a visit soon.

you mean about Sienna? Not much, do a search for her and you'll see she has plenty of positives and a couple of neutrals. On balance nothing that'd put me off seeing her.

[LYL]

you mean about Sienna? Not much, do a search for her and you'll see she has plenty of positives and a couple of neutrals. On balance nothing that'd put me off seeing her.

Yes. Earlier you said this she remains on my HL despite some of the comments about her.. English is not my mother language but doesn't this mean she had some bad comments about her? I've seen her and I doubt there will be another one to dethrone her from my hall of fame..

[Al Reet]

Yes. Earlier you said this she remains on my HL despite some of the comments about her.. English is not my mother language but doesn't this mean she had some bad comments about her? I've seen her and I doubt there will be another one to dethrone her from my hall of fame..

Like I said above all comments about Sienna are in her reviews which are overwhelmingly positive with a couple of neutrals. The link to all her reviews I mentioned to search for is here...

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=5342

[MrMog]

Not wishing to get too involved in this but the very purpose of this site is to be able to post reviews based on experience, be they positive or negative. To suggest that punters should not post negatives as they are just 'Nit Picking' goes against everything this forum stands for. If I wanted a forum full of fluffies I would still use my account on The auto-censored.

If a girl has a lot of Positive posts then great, BUT if her service starts to go shit then I for one would like to know so that I don't waste my hard earned money as I suspect so does most everyone else on here. Take HottyHolly for instance, she has had loads of good reviews but over the past few weeks or so there have been a few negatives, this to me shows her services have gone crap and she is now on my avoid list.

I suggest if Rebecca wants to maintain her positive standing on here then she should give a positive service.

[cueball]

Good post mog.... well put

[rovingman]

Good post mog.... well put

[Mancpunts]

One thing I've learnt over the years is always have a back up plan. Agree with Mog too, well said.

Oh and hi Rebecca lol