Sugar Baby?
Masaj
Shemales

Author Topic: Michelle Independent - June West Brompton tour (meeting never happen)  (Read 23630 times)


136 review(s) for Michelle Independent (134 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline Marmalade

Well she states on her Profile that she has Nordic looks.
As in criticism? She g'nordic.  :D

Offline Jimmyredcab

True, but I still think she won't be posting here again, or at the very least for a long while.

I don't see why.

Her record of reviews on here is pretty impressive ------90 positive      3 negative

Offline Marmalade

I don't see why.

Her record of reviews on here is pretty impressive ------90 positive      3 negative

Indeed. And she should have ssid that herself and laughed about it.

Advice to Michelles and even Rebeccas: if you saw anotger prossie on here getting would up over one or two reviews, what would you advise her to do??

Exactly. And not what you did hen.

You think it only applies to prossies? Well in a way it does and should. But almost anyone who's been around long enough has had a near-scalping at times. You just think ah fuck it, smile, be true to yourself; and remember the reason to be here os to help others (specifically, punters).

You could try treating us as fellow forum members instead of marks.

Offline smiths

I don't see why.

Her record of reviews on here is pretty impressive ------90 positive      3 negative

She behaved on here like a cunt and got stick for doing so, :rolleyes: that's what happens on UKP, with great publicity comes ever closer scrutiny and rightly so. She couldnt even apologise to the punter she fucked about on here openly, piss poor of her in my view. :thumbsdown:


Offline HighlyMotivated

Pleasantly surprised to see jimmyredcab sticking up for a prossie  :D she must be good!

Offline Nagilum

Pleasantly surprised to see jimmyredcab sticking up for a prossie  :D she must be good!

Everyone has a favourite(s)


JuliusSeizure

  • Guest
Everyone has a favourite(s)

I made a rule to steer clear of mine unless it's really necessary for me to have an input.

What makes me laugh though is the more this stays at the top of the review section the more exposure she gets, so the more custom from the newer less "involved" members here who will find out who she is. Coming back to Jimmy's point of 90+ and 3- reviews they will do some research on her and think "Can't really ignore the 90+ going to have to see this for myself".....

James999

  • Guest
What makes me laugh though is the more this stays at the top of the review section the more exposure she gets,

Fail... poor attempt at "reverse psychology" to close the debate  :sarcastic:

JuliusSeizure

  • Guest
Fail... poor attempt at "reverse psychology" to close the debate  :sarcastic:

My point is this thread should have been locked long ago. It's just going around in circles with the same points being brought up and all it's doing is the opposite of it's original intention.

James999

  • Guest
My point is this thread should have been locked long ago.

But this isn't pro$$ienet where the desires of pro$$ies are paramount, your bumping / contributing to a thread you think should be locked  :dash:

Offline Turtle Z

Pleasantly surprised to see jimmyredcab sticking up for a prossie  :D she must be good!

She's not Romanian!

Offline stevedave

that's what happens on UKP, with great publicity comes ever closer scrutiny and rightly so.

Absolutely. Whether it's Michelle or any other "forum darling" you have to be able to accept the rough with the smooth.

There will always be people that leap to their defence, and always be those that are keen to dig the boot in, but the rational punter will be able to discern for himself with the help of the reviews and feedback.

Basically - don't see red and think, no chance, don't see green and think, yeah I'm shagging her tomorrow. Do your research.

Offline Cuntminion

Pleasantly surprised to see jimmyredcab sticking up for a prossie  :D she must be good!

Tis is a surprise

Thing is however much I liked a sp I wouldn't dive in to defend because almost always it makes it worse

Is nothing to do with positive against negative reviews I think from what I have seen more that the response was so lacklustre , she would of probably been better off saying nothing
« Last Edit: July 04, 2016, 09:16:21 pm by comaminion »

Offline Marmalade

My point is this thread should have been locked long ago.

Oh dear. The familiar White Knight cry shedding a tear. Lock the thread! Lock the thread!  :vomit:

Offline Nagilum

As it's been said before, many times. Only Admin decides when to lock these.

Offline Tailpipe

Oh dear. The familiar White Knight cry shedding a tear. Lock the thread! Lock the thread!  :vomit:


Marma always had great respect for you and your posts, But this whole tread is just a waste of internet space.

We build those WGs up then we give them a Kicking. 86 positive reviews suggest that most punters get what they need from this WG.

Everyone has a bad day ask bangers as he seems to book them all on a bad day,  :drinks:

Offline Marmalade


Marma always had great respect for you and your posts, But this whole tread is just a waste of internet space.

We build those WGs up then we give them a Kicking. 86 positive reviews suggest that most punters get what they need from this WG.

Everyone has a bad day ask bangers as he seems to book them all on a bad day,  :drinks:

That is not a reason to lock the thread though.

Offline Tailpipe

That is not a reason to lock the thread though.


I agree , locking threads is adam,s domain only.

OldAdmin

  • Guest
Yet another white-knight bumping a thread that has already dropped of the frontpage.

vw

  • Guest
Yet another white-knight bumping a thread that has already dropped of the frontpage.

Was it page 4 or 5 before the bump ?   :lol: :lol: :lol:


Offline Marmalade

96 positive reviews tells you why 96 people were 'pleased.' One bad review gives you hard facts as to why you might not be.

Sure. All in the balance. But let people make up their own mind instead of putting someone on a voice-of-majority pedestal. I always look for a bad review, even with Amazon, before buying something. Then I decide if it would affect me or not. Often it won't. Other times I am pleased it saved me from the persuasion of the isn't-it-lovely brigade.

Same crap on TripAdviser. Someone has a nice holiday and they rave about Krygoslovakia and the nice restaurant food. They weren't bothered about the lift not working cos they were on the first floor or just enjoyed the exercise. Those relying on their recommendations alone will be sorely disappointed if the lift is a key factor for them.

So in the interests of balance to all the bumpers saying how dear Michelle is usually 'wonderful' I'm going to bump Bangers' review. And if people don't read page 1 then they will still have that balance to make up their own bloody minds.

Long time lurker here, but I feel it's time to finally break my duck to post a review for my fellow punters.

1st up, is the one and only Michelle Independent; one of the most well-reviewed and popular WGs on AW, UKP and UKE sites. Having read all the hype about her beforehand, I wanted to see what the fuss was all about.

I sent her an email via AW last month, regarding a booking which was meant to happen today during her June London tour at West Brompton. She replied, and suggested a different time than the one I initially asked for. And if I agreed with the change of time, I can send her the booking request, which I did and she confirmed it herself. Great, everything was sorted out and I waited for the day of our supposed meet with great anticipation.

However, on the day of our supposed meet... Things did not go exactly as intended. I send her a text this morning to confirm our booking, told her who I was. Instead of receiving a text back with the address, postcode and all that, I received an apology to say she didn't have any booking at that specified time, and that I must of confused her with somebody else?

Already, I was getting a bad vibe from this, but I decided to press on. I insisted we did email one another on AW and we confirmed the date/time. Tried to text her with the photo of our emails, but it didn't go through.

Even after she denies it with a seemingly, standoffish attitude, I clarified again with my AW profile name and the exact date we corresponded through the emails. She apparently checked her emails, and still believe she did not receive any booking requests from me. Then the last straw came, when she said she may be put me on the block list...

I'm a nice guy in general. I've been wrong numerous times before, but I usually just let things slide and move on. Life is pretty short enough as it is. But on this occasion, I feel this negative feedback for Michelle is well-justified and deserved, in addition to the one I left on her AW profile.

And Michelle if you're reading this, just remember you brought this upon yourself. You could have honored this booking, but you choose not to and instead decided to feign ignorance about it, pretending we never corresponded each other. If there was some reason you didn't wish to see me, I would have preferred a straight, honest answer, and I'd accepted it with no hard feelings. But you messed me about, which I do not fully appreciate.

I'm sure you're a wonderful lady, and the guys who have seen you, had a wonderful time with you. Well done to them. But on this occasion, you made a blunder, which you should have owed up. I know you're pretty busy, I can imagine the tons of emails you receive on a daily basis, but this is no excuse.

I'm aware this review isn't likely going to deter new clients, but I thought they deserve to know about the off chance of them getting mess around like this.

External Link/Members Only


Offline Jimmyredcab


Marma always had great respect for you and your posts, But this whole tread is just a waste of internet space.

We build those WGs up then we give them a Kicking. 86 positive reviews suggest that most punters get what they need from this WG.

Everyone has a bad day ask bangers as he seems to book them all on a bad day,  :drinks:

Excellent post.     :drinks: :drinks: :drinks:

Type_O_Negative

  • Guest
It's quite possible there is a few more here she let down. Who knows, these punters decided not to write negative reviews because they didn't want to face this hassle, aggravation and white-knighting from her fan club...

Offline Tailpipe

It's quite possible there is a few more here she let down. Who knows, these punters decided not to write negative reviews because they didn't want to face this hassle, aggravation and white-knighting from her fan club...


May be white knights should have a marker on there profile carrying a health warning  something Like

"beware this users lives in the real world "  "Please disregard anything they say ", as they have feelings and can express them  :D

vw

  • Guest

May be white knights should have a marker on there profile carrying a health warning  something Like

"beware this users lives in the real world "  "Please disregard anything they say ", as they have feelings and can express them  :D

Admin said once he adds those to his buddies list to keep an eye on them.

Not sure how you thought in your "real world" you were helping Michelle by bumping this thread, seems like daft knighting to me rather than white knighting.

I am sure Michelle is delighted with you and may take your feelings you like to "express" and hurt them.

Offline Tailpipe

Admin said once he adds those to his buddies list to keep an eye on them.

Not sure how you thought in your "real world" you were helping Michelle by bumping this thread, seems like daft knighting to me rather than white knighting.

I am sure Michelle is delighted with you and may take your feelings you like to "express" and hurt them.


 :D :D :D :D

mash

  • Guest

May be white knights should have a marker on there profile carrying a health warning  something Like

"beware this users lives in the real world "  "Please disregard anything they say ", as they have feelings and can express them  :D

Was it lost on you that said white knight in this thread was actually you?!


Offline Cunning Punt

But this whole tread is just a waste of internet space.

So why did you bump it, you fool?

Punters had moved on, but you've just reminded people about her rudeness and reports of poor comms, so punters are going to get people having a pop again.  :crazy:

Admin, please start a smiley for "shoot oneself in the foot".


Offline Turtle Z


Everyone has a bad day ask bangers as he seems to book them all on a bad day,  :drinks:

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

Offline Tailpipe

Was it lost on you that said white knight in this thread was actually you?!

Wow I missed that  :hi:

Offline Tailpipe

So why did you bump it, you fool?

Punters had moved on, but you've just reminded people about her rudeness and reports of poor comms, so punters are going to get people having a pop again.  :crazy:

Admin, please start a smiley for "shoot oneself in the foot".

I am just fool  :drinks: