Author Topic: Mia Sweety aka Maya Gold  (Read 2493 times)


13 review(s) for Mia Sweety (12 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline Notts12

External Link/Members Only

Review from 1 hr meet end of Feb. Chose Mia on basis of threads here as my first UK punt in 10 years.

Comms good by email asked for filming and agreed with mask.  Phoned to confirm owo cim rimming (on her) 1.30hr for $130. (where is the pound sign on a mac?}

She textd back to move the time to 4 so had to curtail the meet to 1 hr. I paid her 100 pounds though I think I miscalculated as her hr rate was 80. I had this figure in my mind.The house is mixed residential on road facing industrial estate. Pretty discreet. Seemed to be sharing house with other girls.  I found her pretty with a excellent ass and smooth 'outy' pussy with good sized labia. Her bum whole is large with radiating lines so if a good bum hole is your thing....

I mention this as I choose girls who can film. I used my iphone and a hd camera on a tripod. She didn't insist on a mask so that was good. 

I rimmed her moderately as cautious about sticking it in to deep. wet RO with her bum hole dubbed looked excellent on camera. Unfortunately my camera battery died after 7 mins - so left with iphone. Received good deep bj for 6 mins. Not too sloppy but all mouth no had work. Pumped her doggy for 12 mins or so.  Filmed her playing with her clit for a couple of minutes. Then return to bj 4 mins and cam when in her mouth. As opposed to cumming into her mouth at a distance.

I had enough after 40 mins so finished. I would return and with better ecperience would film more and maybe see about dfk.

On leaving there were a couple of men there who were not punters. A little disconcerting but didn't give me any concerns. 

Very goo value - but would have been excellent at 80 but that was down to me.

Have punted  twice last month with Ruby sexy ass External Link/Members Only both positive and will write up another time.
cheerio.

TheNewSeeker

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Glad she's still performing well.
She told me not all the house occupants are WGs so the blokes may have been due to other visitors, but, given recent events in Derby, a little disconcerting.

Just a tip on reviews, and this is not widely understood, but, only seen girls should be linked to in a review. Otherwise this causes harder work for admin assigning reviews to the correct WG.

Save links to others for follow up replies.
« Last Edit: June 18, 2016, 09:20:24 pm by TheNewSeeker »


Offline Notts12

Thanks I will observe the correct  posting process.
Thanks Pickle nice screen cast.

Just to add: As the threads indicate Mia has no breasts and I would describe her body shape as lean and sinewy. She is pretty regardless and easy to interact with. Calm and pleasant.   


PickleTwiddler

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I'm glad she offers a "no rash" service  :lol:
I'd be awfully worried if  saw a WG and got a rash.

Offline CoolTiger

I'm glad she offers a "no rash" service  :lol:
I'd be awfully worried if  saw a WG and got a rash.


Beg to differ...

Some of us would have liked Rashford service to have been implemented a lot earlier yesterday  :D