SP Location spamming/ Search tips and tricks for finding SPs

[JayEZ2K]

For years I've used the same bookmarked AW "Cambridge" search, which brings up a variety of SPs within the CB postcode and within reasonable distance from the city centre. A couple of weeks ago I noticed several Thais in Peterborough spamming their location with multiple towns including Cambs, despite being in PE29. Now I'm noticing it's spread to several non-Thais, Romanians and Brazilians claiming Cambridge despite being in PE.   


Since I search AW almost daily, I need an efficient and thorough search method. In case it helps others, this is my current search settings:

1. Log into AW
2. Search Female, Escorts, and Town=Cambridge
3. Save Search using the option towards to bottom of the search results page
4. Locate the saved search at the top of the page, under Search > Saved Searches >
5. You will now have a bookmarkable search setting for quick access, even without logging in.

The second search I'm now using is postcode based. So I repeat the process with a fresh search, except at step 2:
2a. Search Female, Escorts. Leave everything else blank.
2b. Go to the "Proximity" tab and enter CB in the Post Code Area: CB

Because these are bookmarked, I can quickly search for female escorts in Cambs, or at any CB postcode. And I can avoid all the idiots/spammers in Peterborough and elsewhere claiming Cambs as their town.

Hope this helps
 


PS If you have any tips and tricks for searching, please let me know!


Hidden Image/Members Only

[Billy no mates]

Not sure if everyone is aware of this, or even if I’m fully right.

When searching postcode and distance the search response appears to be ordered in distance from the postcode, nearest first.

However when search an area East of England > Hertfordshire the search appears to be based on most recent log in from the SP, with most recent first.

I find this useful if I am trying to work out who is actually available right now, because I guess some SP’s just set a date and pay for the day to show the green light, but might only be working till the afternoon or starting after lunch or something.

[limarasa9]

I wouldn’t totally rely on Town for search parameter as some SPs get the spelling of the town names wrong and they would never appear on the search results. I use the first part of my postcode, not just the 2 letters, and search by proximity plus other filters for rate, age etc…

[PilotMan]

The problem I find with a wide search - e.g. "CM" is that it brings up SP's anywhere in the region and they can be a long way apart, plus there's no distance shown on the search results.

I use the actual post code first section 3 or 4 digits and specify a distance of 1 mile - that finds all the girls actually in that locale. If two postcodes are adjacent you can increase the search radius to X miles and it searches both postcodes. You need to know the distance radius / proximity of each postcode to see what comes up.

For example if you search CM1 and specify 1 miles, it will just find SP's in CM1. However, if you increase the radius to 2 miles it also finds SP's in CM2.

However, that doesn't work if you try to search across CM77 & CM8 which are adjacent. You have to increase the radius to 6 miles.

It's just a case of trial and error seeing what postcodes are near to each other, then testing out the radius.

[fatboy]

I have always searched by the first three characters of my postcode and distance from.
I.e., SS3 and 5 miles (say) either increasing or decreasing the mileage from.
Having said that a WG could always give the wrong postcode.
This has always worked for me except it's slightly annoying as I do get WGs from Kent show up.
Still at least I know how far it is to Rochester in a straight line haha.
Cheers, FB.

[Mikepboro]

PE29 is Huntingdon so only just over the border from 'CB'

[Natehell]

I have noticed this searching by postcode does not pick up ff couples which is wierd. I usually search this way.