UKP Stats

[Private Member]

I know we have this page - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=stats - but do we have more detailed stats anywhere?

By that I mean things like:
- the most reviewed WG
- the best/worst WG reviewed (based on some formula that uses number of +ve, neutral and -ve reviews)
- the member with most Reviews

[Doc Holliday]

I know we have this page - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=stats - but do we have more detailed stats anywhere?

By that I mean things like:
- the most reviewed WG
- the best/worst WG reviewed (based on some formula that uses number of +ve, neutral and -ve reviews)
- the member with most Reviews

Only the last one to my knowledge  https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=reviewstatistics

[daviemac]

Why would they be needed?

[m4rmite]

5000+ new members in 2023.
Hopefully that covers the hosting costs.

[Doc Holliday]

5000+ new members in 2023.
Hopefully that covers the hosting costs.

The new member stats covers everyone who completes a registration. The account does not become active until approved. Approval only occurs when payment is made. I would be fairly certain only a relatively small percentage of those complete payment.

[CanOfRedBull]

Only the last one to my knowledge  https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=reviewstatistics

wow oh wow - There are only 4 guys that have posed 300+ reviews.  Wouldn’t you love to have a few beers with them,  they must have some amazing stories about their punting adventures.

[Private Member]

Only the last one to my knowledge  https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=reviewstatistics

Thanks for this 

[Private Member]

Why would they be needed?

Personal curiosity I guess - Personally I'd like to see which girls are the darling of this forum

I'm sure I'm not the only person that would like to see this

[Stevelondon]

wow oh wow - There are only 4 guys that have posed 300+ reviews.  Wouldn’t you love to have a few beers with them,  they must have some amazing stories about their punting adventures.

I’m not sure that even means they have punted more than say someone who has only posted 100 reviews as CRB seems to be suggesting.
There will be an awful lot of guys out there who punt in different ways and with women they can’t review because of it.
I still see two women I met yonks back on CL and of course still punt with girls I’ve already reviewed so just don’t see any reason to go over old ground so to speak. 
But of course I would do if anything changes.

[jimbobted]

Plus No.3 on that list was banned for posting bullshit reviews.

[Blackpool Rock]

wow oh wow - There are only 4 guys that have posed 300+ reviews.  Wouldn’t you love to have a few beers with them,  they must have some amazing stories about their punting adventures.

Not KT no, i'd rather go tee total 

[Iloveoral]

Great, mention the top 4, forget that cunt at no.5 

[Blackpool Rock]

Great, mention the top 4, forget that cunt at no.5 

You know him them